mickeypowell5

Lol. But seriously though. I wish I could know who knows their and who is just talking.

Everyone is telling me to take the trade. What is everyones credentials that is saying this? Are you die hard fantasy football veterans or just casual players? Im leaning towards keeping ellington. The biggest part, and really, only part, is that I need wins NOW. Mccoy has bye next week, and Ellington has three of the worst rush defenses in three weeks....

O.k.. So the trade is Ellington, Torrey Smith and John Brown for LeSean McCoy, Pierre Garcon, and Kniles Davis. I'm so torn on this trade. If I was up there at 4-1 or 3-2 it would be a no brainer, but I am 1-4 and need wins NOW. McCoy has his bye week next week and after this week, Ellington has the easiest three games out of any running back. Torrey Smith is a no brainer, and Pierre Garcon has a decent looking ROS. I want Knile Davis just in case and to give up John Brown is easy for me. I'm just so torn over it. I wish I was 4-1 so I could go ahead and do it. Does anyone really have any good idea on when the Philly offensive line will be healthy? Can anyone give me some insight on why this is a good trade or bad trade?

Im 1-4. I need wins now. Ellingtons jext couple of games is the easiest out of any running back.

Ellingtons next couple of games is ridiculous. But his playoff schedule is horrible. And McCoy offensive line is on the verge of being completely healthy again. Would you?

Standard. How bad is Megatrons knee?

Would you? If I make this trade, this leaves me with Cutler, Megatron, Crabtree, Cruz, Ellington, Asiata, Gronkowski, and bench of Welker, Bradshaw, McKinnon, Hawkins, Torrey Smith, John Brown, mark ingram and Justin Hunter. 6 pts for passing td.

Ppr league.

Jackson a good buy low candidate? Will Jeffrey produce what he did last year? Any have any ideas?

Ppr. Would you? I'm trying to snatch up a couple of buy low guys and Allen is one of them. Cutler looks good this season though and was every analysts sleeper. He's pretty hurt right now though. And Allen just wrnt up against two good corners. Would you?

It's strategy when you are doing what you can to prevent a playoff contender from becoming stronger.

Ten team league. Whenever we issue a trade, there has to be at least four vetoes within the 72 hour period for it to get canceled. Problem is, last year there was around twenty or so vetoes within the first four weeks. I personally believe it is strategy. I don't want the guy who drafted five running bacms in the first five rounds to trade away one of his running backs for a desperately needed quarterback because that is a good trade for him. So I veto. Strategy right? Well that got people angry last year and we've been debating the entire off season and it's apparent that change needs to be made. Some of the options we have is a rotating committee that determines if a trade is reasonable or not. Say, a new four managers each week that decides what stays and what goes. And if one of those managers on the committie is involved in the trade, then they forfeit their position on the committee to the next up in line. Out of those four, three of those managers have to agree that the trade is valid to let the trade go through. Or say, three of those managers have to agree that the trade is unfair and agree to veto. Another option is to have outside consultants from a neighboring league. Or have outside consultants from yahoo (our league is in yahoo.com). The same would go as above with the rotating committee. Or just keep it as it is? Anyone experienced anything like this? Anyone have any suggestions?

Ten team league. Whenever we issue a trade, there has to be at least four vetoes within the 72 hour period for it to get canceled. Problem is, last year there was around twenty or so vetoes within the first four weeks. I personally believe it is strategy. I don't want the guy who drafted five running bacms in the first five rounds to trade away one of his running backs for a desperately needed quarterback because that is a good trade for him. So I veto. Strategy right? Well that got people angry last year and we've been debating the entire off season and it's apparent that change needs to be made. Some of the options we have is a rotating committee that determines if a trade is reasonable or not. Say, a new four managers each week that decides what stays and what goes. And if one of those managers on the committie is involved in the trade, then they forfeit their position on the committee to the next up in line. Out of those four, three of those managers have to agree that the trade is valid to let the trade go through. Or say, three of those managers have to agree that the trade is unfair and agree to veto. Another option is to have outside consultants from a neighboring league. Or have outside consultants from yahoo (our league is in yahoo.com). The same would go as above with the rotating committee. Or just keep it as it is? Anyone experienced anything like this? Anyone have any suggestions?

What about Cruz and Zac Stacy for Jamall Charles.

Standard ppr league. I'm in 5th place out of 16 team league. Top 4 make the playoffs. Lineup is Tony Romo Riley Cooper Dwayne Bowe Cecil Shorts Jamall Charles Shane Vareen C.J. Spiller Jimmy Graham Bench is Kendall Wright Shonn Greene Willis McGahee Bryce Brown Would you give up Charles for Victor Cruz and Fred Jackson or Victor Cruz and Giovanni Bernard? Trade deadline is in 6 hours.