cyclone24 1,805 Posted January 17, 2017 I'm not talking channels but the person, or people. Had this debate today.....I've seen this on local and national stations where someone is leaving the station and they have this tearful goodbye, their "fans" express sadness, a speech is done. I argue that these people are not as important as they think they are....I don't care who gets me the news, if it's not you it's just some other person. Why do I care about someone reading from a promoter? The flip side is these people bring a personality or humor or class to giving the news you like to see everyday. That it's someone you enjoy hearing and counting on every day for your news. Do you care who it is or no? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted January 17, 2017 The chick that was one of the anchors in Nashville is leaving after 24 years. People are losing their minds acting like its sad or something. Oh, and what did she say her last ride? She urged the network to replace her with someone of color. WTF? Why? To combat the racism of having a black female lead anchor for 24 years? I could care less who the anchor is. Just a talking head reading sh!t. Fox news has it right. Just hire hot barbie dolls. Or go the nakednews.com route. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,805 Posted January 17, 2017 The chick that was one of the anchors in Nashville is leaving after 24 years. People are losing their minds acting like its sad or something. Oh, and what did she say her last ride? She urged the network to replace her with someone of color. WTF? Why? To combat the racism of having a black female lead anchor for 24 years? I could care less who the anchor is. Just a talking head reading sh!t. Fox news has it right. Just hire hot barbie dolls. Or go the nakednews.com route. #abbyhuntsman Meow. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
naomi 343 Posted January 17, 2017 Before the whole age of computer it was a little more understandable. I remember caring about some of the news people when I was a kid. They were the main messengers for the community. This makes me slightly emotional when they start hearing from people at the scene https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VwOuS0fbqVs but it's kind of funny too. "I can still feel it rocking, ######." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,082 Posted January 17, 2017 Before the whole age of computer it was a little more understandable.Correct. Before 24 hour news and the internet, I can understand. 2017? Ummm No. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 3,302 Posted January 17, 2017 Yeah only old people care now Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,594 Posted January 17, 2017 I like Lester Holt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frank 2,144 Posted January 17, 2017 I think it's dumb that every local station has a meteorologist. Anyone could just check the weather channel then read the temp and rain chance on the air. Am I supposed to believe they are actually doing whatever it is that lets you predict the weather a week out? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 1,285 Posted January 17, 2017 Couldn't care less personally. Agree about the barbies on fox. At least give me something to look at. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted January 17, 2017 Weather girl Dagmar Metcalf. Was always sunny and hawt Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,631 Posted January 17, 2017 Yeah, now I just want my newsreader to be sneaky hot. We've got a couple here who's her to have that S***** librarian thing working. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BLS 313 Posted January 17, 2017 I was switching around at 10pm last night and ran across Tucker Carlson on Fox. He had some black woman who was involved in politics; democrat, but she was intelligent. He would ask her a question like "Do you agree with X who said 'The democratic party needs someone of color to lead them from here forward'? She simply wouldn't answer the question. He tried to steer her right to it, and even said "it's called a softball, I'm throwing it very slowly, can you please swing at it"? She attacked him and said "Why do you have to throw it slowly? Don't you think I'm capable of handling it?" It drives me nuts. On one side, Tucker Carlson is clearly trying to extract a response (and often the one he wants, in order to drive a point), and she's not taking the bait, and it's a back and forth of retardedness. Nothing get accomplished, she never answered a single question he asked, some of them were very straightforward; which she easily could have answered. But I see BOTH sides doing this, in order to drive a narrative. This country is in FULL propaganda mode, and that scares me. Germany in the 1930's was in full propaganda mode; in order to gain public support. I don't trust any reporter more than any other. However, you can see when you get a clearly biased person (Think Sean Hannity and then think Rachel Maddow), and to me I pay less attention to them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
posty 2,296 Posted January 17, 2017 I couldn't care less Fixed... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,805 Posted January 17, 2017 I was switching around at 10pm last night and ran across Tucker Carlson on Fox. He had some black woman who was involved in politics; democrat, but she was intelligent. He would ask her a question like "Do you agree with X who said 'The democratic party needs someone of color to lead them from here forward'? She simply wouldn't answer the question. He tried to steer her right to it, and even said "it's called a softball, I'm throwing it very slowly, can you please swing at it"? She attacked him and said "Why do you have to throw it slowly? Don't you think I'm capable of handling it?" It drives me nuts. On one side, Tucker Carlson is clearly trying to extract a response (and often the one he wants, in order to drive a point), and she's not taking the bait, and it's a back and forth of retardedness. Nothing get accomplished, she never answered a single question he asked, some of them were very straightforward; which she easily could have answered. But I see BOTH sides doing this, in order to drive a narrative. This country is in FULL propaganda mode, and that scares me. Germany in the 1930's was in full propaganda mode; in order to gain public support. I don't trust any reporter more than any other. However, you can see when you get a clearly biased person (Think Sean Hannity and then think Rachel Maddow), and to me I pay less attention to them. I don't mind a confrontational host at all. In fact I prefer them over partisan hosts. I'd rather see these hosts take people to task and rip on them. Unfortunately you would never get any guests like that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites