Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 7, 2018 wrongWeak retort as always. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 8, 2018 http://thefederalist.com/2018/04/27/confirmed-former-feinstein-staffer-hired-fusion-gps-christopher-steele/ Dan Jones, former Feinstein staffer focus of leaking probe. He helped raise $50 million to continue Operation against Trump. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 8, 2018 Something to chew on while I listen to talking heads yammer about DOJ withholding evidence. The DOJ is investigating leak by the S.I.C. so why would they give them evidence to blow the case? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted June 8, 2018 https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/video/ryan-agrees-no-evidence-fbi-spied-on-trump/vi-AAylOup?ocid=spartandhp Add Ryan to the list of republicans that agree his claims on spyware have no basis in fact. muh Ryan muh Gowdy muh McCain (is he dead yet? haven't seen him "tweet" in a while) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,618 Posted June 8, 2018 I have little faith that anyone beyond MCCabe and maybe some other DOJ/FBI lifers will face any sort of prosecution, and they will make plea deals to process crimes. The cover up is happening right in front of us. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted June 8, 2018 Found the leaker! https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/07/us/politics/times-reporter-phone-records-seized.html A former Senate Intelligence Committee aide was arrested on Thursday in an investigation of classified information leaks where prosecutors also secretly seized years’ worth of a New York Times reporter’s phone and email records. The former aide, James A. Wolfe, 57, was charged with lying repeatedly to investigators about his contacts with three reporters. According to the authorities, Mr. Wolfe made false statements to the F.B.I. about providing two of them with sensitive information related to the committee’s work. He denied to investigators that he ever gave classified material to journalists, the indictment said. This dude was leaking for 3 years to his f buddy in the media, most recently employed by the NYT. Confirmed that he leaked the identity of Carter Page as Male-1 to his side piece, Reporter-2. Her phone and email records were seized, he was indicted. Her twitter feed is pretty funny in retrospect: https://twitter.com/baloo499/status/1004926596514492423 She was blaming Trump admin and lawyers for all of the leaking when in reality it was her and her f buddy. what a dumb ###### Looking forward to watching them burn. A bonus: they were communicating using Signal, an "encrypted" messaging app. Same app that a lot of the FBI/DOJ/CIA/DNI crooks were using in 2015-2016. Trump has all their messages. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 8, 2018 https://youtu.be/wyydeG4hphw Remember how giddy the Spice Girls here were when it was reported that Flynn was cooperating fully and ready to testify against Trump? Turns out that was a barium tracer to find the cancerous leaker. https://t.co/xYup2axzfX?amp=1 Take note Patriots that this indicates just how grand a show you're watching. Nothing is what it seems and you're seeing the lead up to a barrage where Trump and Company are going to lay waste to those who conspired against him as well as firing for effect. Sit back and enjoy. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 8, 2018 Great strategy.....publically expose the leaker and his press contacts BEFORE you bring the real pain. Puts everyone on notice for what's coming. Now not only will people be afraid to leak but the press will have to wonder if the info is part of a mole hunt. I.G. report (which it's rumored to contain more than just the FBI's handling of HRC email), Awan, FISA, Uranium One, Obama and Iran, etc.... Glorious. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 8, 2018 muh Ryan muh Gowdy muh McCain (is he dead yet? haven't seen him "tweet" in a while) And more than that...any credible people who have seen the evidence say the opposite yet? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 8, 2018 And more than that...any credible people who have seen the evidence say the opposite yet? Prove Gowdy, Paul and McCain are credible sunshine. All three leaving....two way early by comparison to counterparts. Why is that? McCain supposedly on death's doorstep only AFTER Trump took office and it became clear he wouldn't be sacked. December 21st, 2017.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,618 Posted June 8, 2018 Filthy, it's reported that the DOJ isn't turning over info to congress. Why doesn't Trump order them to do as asked? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,484 Posted June 8, 2018 muh Ryan muh Gowdy muh McCain (is he dead yet? haven't seen him "tweet" in a while) The Pear Shaped Loser is still clueless on the makeup of The Swamp. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 8, 2018 Filthy, it's reported that the DOJ isn't turning over info to congress. Why doesn't Trump order them to do as asked? Exactly; why NOT help yourself? Trump could order the DOJ turn over evidence that will make him look the victim of a biased attack by the previous admin. Or....he could stay 'removed' and 'criticize' the DOJ while they 'withold' requested docs that are most likely evidence in criminal referrals. Trump knows he has all the aces and is thinking long term. Theater sir. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 8, 2018 The Pear Shaped Loser is still clueless on the makeup of The Swamp. No...I have more of a grasp of it than you ever will. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 8, 2018 No...I have more of a grasp of it than you ever will. So you only refute his assertion of your grasp of the swamp but agree with him calling you a pear shaped loser? Now that we have that settled... https://images.search.yahoo.com/images/view;_ylt=AwrEwM80_BpbRioAV3CInIlQ;_ylu=X3oDMTIyMDA5NDZhBHNlYwNzcgRzbGsDaW1nBG9pZANkYmNlNTllYzU0MTdiYjY4ZjRjZDEyZWZhZTkwMmY1NwRncG9zAzEEaXQDYmluZw--?.origin=&back=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.search.yahoo.com%2Fsearch%2Fimages%3Fp%3Dpear%2Bshaped%2Bloser%26fr%3Dyfp-hrmob%26fr2%3Dpiv-web%26tab%3Dorganic%26ri%3D1&w=500&h=391&imgurl=media.makeameme.org%2Fcreated%2Fwhat-a-pearshaped.jpg&rurl=https%3A%2F%2Fmakeameme.org%2Fmeme%2Fwhat-a-pearshaped&size=33.3KB&name=What+A+%3Cb%3EPear-Shaped+Loser%3C%2Fb%3E+%7C+Make&p=pear-shaped+loser&oid=dbce59ec5417bb68f4cd12efae902f57&fr2=piv-web&fr=yfp-hrmob&rw=pear-shaped+loser&tt=What+A+%3Cb%3EPear-Shaped+Loser%3C%2Fb%3E+%7C+Make&b=0&ni=21&no=1&ts=&tab=organic&sigr=11c01f32o&sigb=13bvlc5hl&sigi=11hjdb4p5&sigt=11666g5uf&sign=11666g5uf&.crumb=NFoIYJk9Hev&fr=yfp-hrmob&fr2=piv-web Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted June 12, 2018 Rosenstein threatened to 'subpoena' GOP-led committee in 'chilling' clash over records, emails show http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/12/rosenstein-threatened-to-subpoena-gop-led-committee-in-chilling-clash-over-records-emails-show.html What a scumbag, threatening members of Congress for doing their jobs. What are you hiding Rosie? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 13, 2018 Rod Rosenstein will be gone soon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted June 13, 2018 Rod Rosenstien is sweating like a CNN host after Trump gives a State of the Union Address or has a Singapore Summit or wins an election. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 13, 2018 Rod Rosenstien is sweating like a CNN host after Trump gives a State of the Union Address or has a Singapore Summit or wins an election. You are mistakingbthat for Nunes and his cronies. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 13, 2018 http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/ The PAIN is coming. Q in overdrive..........standing by to hand out red pills. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted June 13, 2018 http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/ The PAIN is coming. Q in overdrive..........standing by to hand out red pills. How about that missile that was launched off the coast of WA the other day? And the missile that was launched at Hawaii a few months ago? Both shot down. That has to piss them off to the point of cracking necks and breaking out the heart attack gun. https://s22.postimg.cc/ffj5bqhmp/image.png I expect there to be more missile false flags before Korean Peace is achieved. They will do anything to keep their power, even if it means starting a nuclear war. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 13, 2018 How about that missile that was launched off the coast of WA the other day? And the missile that was launched at Hawaii a few months ago? Both shot down. That has to piss them off to the point of cracking necks and breaking out the heart attack gun. https://s22.postimg.cc/ffj5bqhmp/image.png I expect there to be more missile false flags before Korean Peace is achieved. They will do anything to keep their power, even if it means starting a nuclear war. You arent smarter than 98%of this bored. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 14, 2018 You arent smarter than 98%of this bored. Says the guy who has to block 98% of the bored instead of debating them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 14, 2018 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-06-14/comey-broke-from-fbi-procedures-in-clinton-probe-watchdog-finds Former FBI Director James Comey “deviated” from FBI and Justice Department procedures in handling the probe into Hillary Clinton, damaging the law enforcement agencies’ image of impartiality even though he wasn’t motivated by political bias, the department’s watchdog found in a highly anticipated report. Slap on the wrist...as expected...broke from norms, showed no bias. On the texts... “We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed,” Horowitz said in the report to be issued Thursday. “The conduct by these employees cast a cloud over the entire FBI investigation.” As expected...except from the conspiracy Comey/Hillary/Obama going to jail crowd. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 14, 2018 Explain Huber's appointment. The MSM Would love to see James Comey as being the firebreak. The problem with that is it doesn't explain all the unmasking that went on nor Bruce awards Ohr's role. Poor Slo Nutt. Hope his xanax prescription is up-to-date Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 14, 2018 The Washington Post reported that Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report includes an August 2016 text message exchange between Strzok and then-FBI lawyer Lisa Page about Trump’s chance of being elected president. “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” Page texted Strzok. “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it,” Strzok responded. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-receiving-briefing-ahead-of-public-release-of-report-expected-to-criticize-fbi/2018/06/14/c08c6a5a-6fdf-11e8-bf86-a2351b5ece99_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.2299c24be13e Yeah..............that's the Washington Post. All just a conspiracy right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted June 14, 2018 Lol. Poor little Sho. What you just quoted proves Comey was incompetent at his job. Firing was justified. Aka, no obstruction. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted June 14, 2018 The Washington Post reported that Inspector General Michael Horowitzs report includes an August 2016 text message exchange between Strzok and then-FBI lawyer Lisa Page about Trumps chance of being elected president. [Trumps] not ever going to become president, right? Right?! Page texted Strzok. No. No he wont. Well stop it, Strzok responded. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-receiving-briefing-ahead-of-public-release-of-report-expected-to-criticize-fbi/2018/06/14/c08c6a5a-6fdf-11e8-bf86-a2351b5ece99_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.2299c24be13e Yeah..............that's the Washington Post. All just a conspiracy right? No, we'll stop him. Why was that redacted before? That does not look good for Peter. Sounds like conspiracy. Sounds like obstruction. Potentially sedition. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 1,479 Posted June 14, 2018 Peter is swinging in the breeze, about to get whacked. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 5,188 Posted June 14, 2018 The Washington Post reported that Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report includes an August 2016 text message exchange between Strzok and then-FBI lawyer Lisa Page about Trump’s chance of being elected president. “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” Page texted Strzok. “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it,” Strzok responded. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-receiving-briefing-ahead-of-public-release-of-report-expected-to-criticize-fbi/2018/06/14/c08c6a5a-6fdf-11e8-bf86-a2351b5ece99_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.2299c24be13e Yeah..............that's the Washington Post. All just a conspiracy right? “Mistakes were made,” the FBI said in a lengthy statement issued in response to the report. The bureau admitted to “errors of judgment, violations of or disregard for policy, or, when viewed with the benefit of hindsight, simply not the best courses of action. They were not, in any respect, the result of bias or improper considerations.” I mean, you can say those words I guess. They are words after all. But Who has a defense for this? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted June 14, 2018 Something you will not see on CNN or Sho's propaganda network: https://twitter.com/RepMarkMeadows/status/1007330850483179520 p420-421 from the report: The conduct of the five FBI employees described in sections A, B, and C of this Chapter has brought discredit to themselves, sowed doubt about the FBI’s handling of the Midyear investigation, and impacted the reputation of the FBI. As described in Chapter Five, our review did not find documentary or testimonial evidence directly connecting the political views these employees expressed in their text messages and instant messages to the specific investigative decisions we reviewed in Chapter Five. Nonetheless, the conduct by these employees cast a cloud over the FBI Midyear investigation and sowed doubt the FBI’s work on, and its handling of, the Midyear investigation. Moreover, the damage caused by their actions extends far beyond the scope of the Midyear investigation and goes to the heart of the FBI’s reputation for neutral factfinding and political independence. We were deeply troubled by text messages sent by Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations. Most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, which was not a part of this review. Nonetheless, when one senior FBI official, Strzok, who was helping to lead the Russia investigation at the time, conveys in a text message to another senior FBI official, Page, that “we’ll stop” candidate Trump from being elected after other extensive text messages between the two disparaging candidate Trump it is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a 421 willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects. This is antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice. Moreover, as we describe in Chapter Nine, in assessing Strzok’s decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the Midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop in October 2016, these text messages led us to conclude that we did not have confidence that Strzok’s decision was free from bias. Each of the fi muh no political bias. This is yet another lesson that you can' trust the MSM for anything. Always go to the source. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,618 Posted June 14, 2018 So, conspiracies do exist. I was told they didn't Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 14, 2018 Predictable as ever. OIG was going to be the savior for you all...going to be the thing that puts Comey away...and all those others. Nope...slap on the wrist...find no bias from Comey or Strzok and Page. This was a big nothing...and yet...here comes the spin from you all. Comey found to have gone outside of protocols only. Which we already knew. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 14, 2018 Something you will not see on CNN or Sho's propaganda network: https://twitter.com/RepMarkMeadows/status/1007330850483179520 p420-421 from the report: muh no political bias. This is yet another lesson that you can' trust the MSM for anything. Always go to the source. I posted from Bloomberg dumbass. And we knew about that from Page and Strzok...which is why they were removed from the investigation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted June 14, 2018 Predictable as ever. OIG was going to be the savior for you all...going to be the thing that puts Comey away...and all those others. Nope...slap on the wrist...find no bias from Comey or Strzok and Page. This was a big nothing...and yet...here comes the spin from you all. Comey found to have gone outside of protocols only. Which we already knew. You may want to read the post 2 above yours. It is direct from the report, not spin from CNN or communistguys.com (or Bloomberg ) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Hand 482 Posted June 14, 2018 Yeah, no bias! LMAO Inspector general refers five FBI employees for investigation over 'hostile' political messages http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/14/inspector-general-refers-five-fbi-employees-for-investigation-over-hostile-political-messages.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted June 14, 2018 You may want to read the post 2 above yours. It is direct from the report, not spin from CNN or communistguys.com (or Bloomberg )Why do you talk about CNN and out my actual source in parentheses?Ive read it...you should read it more. And aboutbhisnwork bs an appearances of biased opinion. potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative And again...its why he was removed from the investigation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 14, 2018 I posted from Bloomberg dumbass. And we knew about that from Page and Strzok...which is why they were removed from the investigation. They weren't removed from the HRC Email investigation which this report was about. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted June 14, 2018 http://dailycaller.com/2018/06/14/mueller-lawyer-resisted-trump/ Another Mueller Team Lawyer sacked at some point recently for anti-Trump messages. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites