crackills 19 Posted September 30, 2014 With Welker back.. how do you see the targets playing out going forward and who would you rather have? Sanders - higher ceiling as he can take any catch to the house with his speed. Welker - PPR monster.. will be targeted quiet a bit during the game and in the redzone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
50shades 10 Posted September 30, 2014 I still like Sanders. I also think Denver is going to look much sharper after the bye week. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaBeerz 88 Posted September 30, 2014 With Welker back.. how do you see the targets playing out going forward and who would you rather have? Sanders - higher ceiling as he can take any catch to the house with his speed. Welker - PPR monster.. will be targeted quiet a bit during the game and in the redzone. Redzone, Manning looks for Thomas almost every time. Open field on a must have 1st down conversion, he looks for Welker. I'd rather have Sanders, more upside and less injury prone. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 2,452 Posted September 30, 2014 With Welker back.. how do you see the targets playing out going forward and who would you rather have? Sanders - higher ceiling as he can take any catch to the house with his speed. Welker - PPR monster.. will be targeted quiet a bit during the game and in the redzone. Sanders Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Challenger 72 Posted September 30, 2014 Sanders is catching everything thrown his way and gotten Manning's trust. Trust is key in Manning's Fantasy Points success. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JediMaster 20 Posted September 30, 2014 Sanders for sure. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LoOnAtIk 75 Posted September 30, 2014 Welker had about 75 receptions last year with Broncos so that makes him a PPR "monster"? Cmon. Sanders and it's not even close, barring injury. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BigMilk 40 Posted October 1, 2014 I'd rather have either of them over Domyanus Thomas. Thought I had such a steal grabbing him in the 2nd round. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shorepatrol 1,736 Posted October 1, 2014 I'd rather have either of them over Domyanus Thomas. Thought I had such a steal grabbing him in the 2nd round. Peyton keeps tabs, D Thomas will go off , relax Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BigMilk 40 Posted October 1, 2014 I won't relax. Don't tell me what to do. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shorepatrol 1,736 Posted October 1, 2014 I won't relax. Don't tell me what to do. Oh you drafted him too Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BigMilk 40 Posted October 1, 2014 If someone sucks donkey bowels, chances are I drafted him/her. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shorepatrol 1,736 Posted October 1, 2014 If someone sucks donkey bowels, chances are I drafted him/her. Oh come on!!!!!!!!!!!!! Way to early to be in this pessimistic mindset!!!!!!!!!!!!! It's not like you drafted AP ,McCoy or D Martin man. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BigMilk 40 Posted October 1, 2014 1) Lacy 2) Dirtyanus Thomas 3) Cordarelle Patterson 4) Toby Gerhart. Showme a worse 4 round start than that. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shorepatrol 1,736 Posted October 1, 2014 1) Lacy 2) Dirtyanus Thomas 3) Cordarelle Patterson 4) Toby Gerhart. Showme a worse 4 round start than that. Jesus focking Christ, feel free to go apeshiit, my bad. It happens Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jpcdds 21 Posted October 1, 2014 1) Lacy 2) Dirtyanus Thomas 3) Cordarelle Patterson 4) Toby Gerhart. Showme a worse 4 round start than that. Dude... You selected CP and Toby in rounds 3 and 4!?! Hate to say it but you deserve what you are getting... Sorry Bro! You should fire your GM... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skinny_Bastard 154 Posted October 1, 2014 1) Lacy 2) Dirtyanus Thomas 3) Cordarelle Patterson 4) Toby Gerhart. Showme a worse 4 round start than that. You suck. QB early would had been solid. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SAA 12 Posted October 2, 2014 Hope Dirtyanus (never heard that by the way) goes off. I just traded Bradshaw, K Davis and Andre Johnson for him. I also get Prater. I figure I was selling high and buying low. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gratefulegg1973 253 Posted October 2, 2014 1. Peterson 2. Marshall 3. Nelson 4. Foster 5. Vereen Outside of Nelson, well, it's not good Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BigMilk 40 Posted October 2, 2014 You suck. QB early would had been solid. Yes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Squintz82 45 Posted October 2, 2014 1. Peterson 2. Marshall 3. Nelson 4. Foster 5. Vereen Outside of Nelson, well, it's not good Marshall should be back at 100% this week. Practiced in full on a Wednesday. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cuse9 128 Posted October 2, 2014 Welker had about 75 receptions last year with Broncos so that makes him a PPR "monster"? Cmon. Sanders and it's not even close, barring injury. Averaged about 6 catches and 65 yards a game. That's 12 ppg and had 10 TD's. So he averaged about 16 ppg, pretty decent. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skinny_Bastard 154 Posted October 2, 2014 PPR monster is around 120+ catches...now, that's a monster. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cuse9 128 Posted October 2, 2014 PPR monster is around 120+ catches...now, that's a monster. His last four years.....123, 123, 118, 120...would that be a PPR monster? That was before Denver... He was only on pace for about 100 last year...then the hit at KC ended his run to 100. So, he is a ppr monster, however, you have to factor in the likelihood of another concussion and DT, Julius, Sanders....a lot more weapons than there was in NE. So, his monster days are prolly behind him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skinny_Bastard 154 Posted October 2, 2014 His last four years.....123, 123, 118, 120...would that be a PPR monster? That was before Denver... He was only on pace for about 100 last year...then the hit at KC ended his run to 100. So, he is a ppr monster, however, you have to factor in the likelihood of another concussion and DT, Julius, Sanders....a lot more weapons than there was in NE. So, his monster days are prolly behind him. His PPR monster days are over. Going forward Sanders is the one to own. Sanders have caught 6,8 & 11 to start the season. He caught 76% of his passes this season. All signs point to him replicating Decker's performance from last season with potentially more receptions and rec yards. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LoOnAtIk 75 Posted October 2, 2014 His last four years.....123, 123, 118, 120...would that be a PPR monster? That was before Denver... He was only on pace for about 100 last year...then the hit at KC ended his run to 100. So, he is a ppr monster, however, you have to factor in the likelihood of another concussion and DT, Julius, Sanders....a lot more weapons than there was in NE. So, his monster days are prolly behind him. After week 11 (KC) he had 64 catches giving him an average of under 6 per game and he would have needed 7 per game to break 100. Point being he was not a PPR monster last year with Denver, his skill set is diminishing and the injuries are a concern. Useful yes, PPR monster no. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fantasy Fiend 38 Posted October 5, 2014 DT......is back. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites