4thand26

Stafford CJ Garcon http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=424626&p=5104296

1 pt for 10 yards 3 pts for td Note: not ppr

Keepers league 3 pts = 1 td 1 pt = 10 yds thanks

1 pt = 10 yds 3 pts = 1 td NON PPR Gore vs Saints SJax vs Raiders Thanks dudes and dudettes!

30yds=1pt 1td=3pts thanks and leave a link

not at all...Packers really only gave up two 3's to move up. I like it. this kid is mean and fills a void on the outside. now we can rest till tomorrow!!

I watched every Packers game last year and what I saw was fairly stout Def. Before you start laughing let me elaborate. the Pack's D kept the game close...Only until the 4th quarter when they flat out fell apart. I think the Def line was the most to blame here not our LB's. It seemed there was no steam and with the injuries we had on the def line it did make some sence. It doesn't matter now, Hawk will be playing the Mike position and will be responsible for run stuffing, which is probably his best asset. Lets hope Barnett comes back healthy, there's no doubting him motivation! Lets be honest, no one has any clue what TT is going to do @#9. What is nice is there are needs on our roster (mostly on Def) but they are no major holes. Def line, OLB, OT, and even CB will be the position taken I'm sure. Heck, TT might even do the ol trade down!! oh well, lets just hope he hits on the pick.

Will TT bring in a decent FA? I believe TT will really look at the possibility of Peppers and may even over pay. However, I feel that someone else will overpay even more, the chances of Peppers wearing Green and Gold is not very high. TT will make a couple moves in free agency however, and don't be surprised if its adding experience at the DE (Canty or Orlansky) and perhaps the LB position (BArt Scott?). Will TT stay at #9 or trade down for 2 5th and a 7th? Nope, TT picks BPA at #9. With 2 #3's there is no reason to trade down!! If at #9 who will they draft? Raji if available (a rotation with Pickett would be more than adequate). A tweener DE: Oropko or E. Brown. I SERIOUSLY would like to see Hawk try the Outside, he's a great athelite and I think could excell at OLB in the 3-4 (ala Harrison who's 6' 240) In this case i can see the Pack look at Maualuga. What positions need to be upgraded? I don't think OT needs to be upgraded if we resign Taush, but needs to be added too. Our biggest concern is to add a playmaker in our front seven even more importnantly add some veteran leadership to help the transition to the 3-4. Best case scenario is this: Overpay for Ray Lewis, he'd QB our defence, he'd add leadership, and he's got a few Great years left in him. Put Hawk on the outside. I'm cautiously optomistic about this switch to the 3-4, but our Def has a lot of talent. If the leadership and some 3-4 experience is added the sky is the limit. peace out.

would anyone else make this trade (if you owned LT)? they're all playing crappy, which tandem is the safer duo?

very surprising!! i thought a lineman or defense was going to be the choice here... a little confused...is this guy a return guy??? he's over 6'2"...not prototypical slash and dash guy. 2008 year of the 6 WR sets!! (4 o-linemen??)

where can I find updated draft day trades? I wan to know what the Pack traded for #30 to the Jets. thx (I can't find this info on NFL.com)

Burress is hurt, Berrian against the Skins and he is inconsistant, BJ (w/o Boldin), and Furrey may get a lot of targets...? Also, LTs matchup against Tennessee and Haynesworth is much less intriguing than Graham against Houston. I may be over thinking but Graham seems like the SAFER choice!! thanks!!

Would anyone make this trade? 1 pt = 10 yds rush/rec 3 pt = 1 td thx!

Portis would be the obvious choice here, but I'm still weiry about that knee...Start Jones. He may not rush for 100yards but you can bet he'll get half a dozen catches which makes hima safer choice. please see mine, thanks: http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=283822

I want to have the same thought as everyone else here (Williams/Holmes)...BUT...Edwards is a #1WR and Holmes is a #2. Opposed to what someone else said I think you start Edwards until Holmes proves to outplay him. Williams no question, and Edwards. check mine out please, http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=283822