hoytdwow 202 Posted October 21, 2014 They also beat the VaGiants in 2007 if Samuel doesn't drop that pick on sideline and win again in 2011 IF Welker catches that ball. So could have, would have and should have but didn't They beat the VaGiants if the focking ref knows the rules and blows the play because Manning was in the grasp. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,082 Posted October 21, 2014 They beat the VaGiants if the focking ref knows the rules and blows the play because Manning was in the grasp. If the Panthers kicker doesn't put the kickoff out of freaking bounds in the final minutes and gives the Pats great field postition they may might not get in FG range and lose to Carolina. If "If's" and "but's" were candy and nuts it'd be Christmas every day. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 21, 2014 They beat the VaGiants if the focking ref knows the rules and blows the play because Manning was in the grasp. They have ZERO championships if the Tuck Rule wasn't INVENTED for that Oakland game or they didn't have film on Rams, Steelers, etc. The Pats are who they are because of Belichick (and his hijinks a.k.a. his cheating) and that SH!TTY FOCKING DIVISION; NOT because of Brady. Cassel proved that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tigeru 65 Posted October 21, 2014 No matter which side you take you expected the results from Manning as a top pick. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LoOnAtIk 75 Posted October 21, 2014 Let's also not forget that Manning has played 3 more seasons than Brady (98-00) Ok what does that have to do with anything that I said? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hoytdwow 202 Posted October 22, 2014 If "If's" and "but's" were candy and nuts it'd be Christmas every day. If wishes were horses, beggars would ride Share this post Link to post Share on other sites