One of our owner has stated he is done with our league after 2 years. He is frustrated because his team is terrible.
This league is very competative. So if your a rookie owner this league will eat you up.
Please send info for joining to email@example.com
The reason I am asking now is that this is a keeper league and we RESET in 2012. So all the keeper rules are being voted on now and I want all
owners to participate.
All TD's 6 points
Rush/Rec yards 1 point per 10
Pass yards 1 point per 25
All 2 point conversions 2 points
Fumbles lost -3
sacks 2 points
Int/Fum 3 points
safety 2 points
0 = 10 points
1-6 = 7 points
7-13 = 4 points
14-20 = 1 point
21-27 = 0 points
28-34 = -1 points
35+ = -4 points
Negative and fraction points on
2 divsions 10 teams
6 playoff teams, 2 division winner and 4 wild cards
division winner get 1st round bye.
Super Bowl winner and loser
Waivers are set at the beginning of the year and only move when a player is gotten from WW.
All players are FA. Only dropped players go on waivers.
Keeper rules now
you get 3 keepers from the round you drafted them
Keeper move up rounds based on voting from the league. Max 3 rounds per year.
Keeper rules are complicated and changing so if you are really interested I can point you to a solid explanation.
Commish has trade veto power, If I am involved in a trade then, major rules for veto, without teams involved.
I have vetoed 1 trade in 10 or so years. I only veto if I think there is a very good chance of collusion.
Even if it looks lopsided I don't veto. I believe the veto power is to stop abuse only.
Most rule suggestion are brought up by teams and voted on the next year. Since its a reset year all rules are up for a vote.
In keeper years I don't change major rules that can effect keepers. I don't think its fair at that point.
As commish, I have the final say. There are a few rule changes that have been brought up that I did not put to a vote.
I feel there needs to be some rules that are there for fair play and I do not allow teams to just vote to change them.
For example, in the past someone wanted a trade veto based on majority. I said no and there was no vote on this.
I feel that just because one side looks to be getting a better deal is not a valid reason to veto a trade and this can happen in a vote.
Veto is used for abuse, collusion only. This is a rare thing, but thats how the league is run. As commish its my job to keep
the league running fair for all owners and if that mean I make a call on something thats what I do.
One last thing, I am thinking of making this a 12 team league, so if we can get 3 owners we will with a vote approval of the other 9 and the 1st new owner.
If anyone has questions email me
Need new owner for 2012
1 reply to this topic