National Estrogen League
NEL ? ?
I don't.. you don't.. nm.
Posted 25 March 2012 - 05:04 PM
National Estrogen League
Posted 26 March 2012 - 09:22 AM
I don't think there is any difference. Defensive players have always wanted to crush and knock people out of the game. Paid or not with a bounty bonus. The NFL has gone soft. The National Estrogen League has begun.
If every team fined defensive players for missed tackles, that's not a bounty plan?
I know I'm getting fined if this dude keeps running? I guess I'll try to murder everyone I hit so they go down. Goodell is a clown.
Posted 26 March 2012 - 12:01 PM
The "team" didn't fine anyone. The players, in their kangaroo court setting, did so.
Once the "team" ie "employer" becomes involved, it's an entirely different situation.
And when convicted felons are pledging $10,000 for anyone that injures a specific player, you're getting much deeper into very murky waters.
Posted 26 March 2012 - 12:12 PM
The game they're all playing if football. Its not tennis out there.
Defensive coaches all preach to crush offensive players every single day. Because its football. The employer is involved in this message. The players are paid for this action. There is no difference between paying a guy to crush someone and paying a guy a bounty to crush someone. The message is the same, bounty or not. So what's the difference?
Watch, there will be no bounty programs and guess what, defensive coaches will still preach to kill the other guy and defensive players will still try to kill the other players in 2013.
Its a feel good story for Goodell and his ego that he's eliminating a seedy element in football. Its only a feel good "story" because it means nothing. It changes nothing. Its football.
The 49ers were KILLING dude's all year last year. It was a sight to see. It was great football. They weren't on a bounty. So what's the real difference? This whole thing is a joke and its all about Goodell and his ego and his attempt to emasculate the defense in football to keep the franchise players on the field earning money for the NFL and selling jerseys/tickets. Its a disservice to the game. Its a tragedy he went completely overboard on the Saints. Vilma is going to get suspended for playing football last year. Watch.
Shouldn't they suspend Patrick Willis. The 49ers paid him a huge salary last year and told him to crush people. Shouldn't they suspend everyone?
Posted 26 March 2012 - 12:19 PM
I couldn't disagree with you more. The 49'ers are not being paid to "crush" guys. They are paid to make plays, some of which include tackling. There is a huge difference in playing physical and playing dirty (with intent to injure).
There are some players (see: Brandon Merriweather) that teams are going to steer clear of because they spear and tackle in ways that are causing 15 yarders.
Posted 26 March 2012 - 12:30 PM
Then why weren't they Saints flagged for illegal hits? Its football. They were just making plays according to the refs.
Tell Pierre Thomas in the 49ers v Saints playoff game that when he got killed because that gentleman who blew him up helmut first was just making a play. He knocked PT out of the game. It instantly changed the game for the Saints. Its incredibly naive to think coaches and players on the 49ers last year played with no intent to knock players out of the game. You are delusional if you think so. Every defense in the league wants to knock players out of the game. You know it. I know it. But its a nice story to think they don't and its all good will.
Give me a break.
Posted 26 March 2012 - 12:37 PM
Ummm. They were flagged for penalties. If you look at the defensive personal fouls from 2009-2011, the Saints were the 3rd most flagged team out there. The Lions led the way (hello, Suh).
Posted 26 March 2012 - 12:41 PM
So why weren't the #1 and #2 most flagged teams for personal fouls suspending coaches? You think they weren't trying to knock players out of the game? Its disingenuous for Goodell to say that only the Saints wanted to knock players out with intent to injure. At the end of the day all defensive players are being payed in some shape or form to knock guys out. Its NFL football. These guys aren't playing for free.
You think teams aren't trying to knock people out of games. You are on an island there.
Posted 26 March 2012 - 01:06 PM
Those other teams might have a bounty program. I don't know that they do or don't. Do you have any proof?
The league knew that the Saints had the bounty program, that they lied about it and that they were taking money in from KNOWN FELONS.
You just don't get it. It was wrong when they did it, it was wrong when they lied and it is still wrong now that they have been caught.
Posted 26 March 2012 - 01:09 PM
It was never wrong because I draw no distinction between paying players a salary to knock people out of game and a bounty program. The NFL is one giant bounty program for defenses at the end of the day. Its the nature of the game. Goodell is attempting to warp it. He can't, but he's all about image at the expense of teams. He crushed the Saints. Its a joke.
Posted 26 March 2012 - 01:10 PM
Goodell is trying to warp it? From your apologist point of view, I think you might want to look in the mirror.
Posted 26 March 2012 - 01:32 PM
Kent - the spirit of what you're saying is correct.I'm not an apologist. I'm a realist. All defenses want to knock guys out of games. You are deluded thinking they aren't preaching this and trying to do this.
Posted 26 March 2012 - 02:38 PM
It was never wrong because I draw no distinction between paying players a salary to knock people out of game and a bounty program. The NFL is one giant bounty program for defenses at the end of the day. Its the nature of the game. Goodell is attempting to warp it. He can't, but he's all about image at the expense of teams. He crushed the Saints. He didn't change a thing. Its a joke.
Posted 26 March 2012 - 04:20 PM
This is an absurd argument.
The NFL teams pay defensive players to STOP offensive players. Tell em a funny joke, tickle em, wrap em up and throw them down, whatever.
What the bounty program did is to incentivize not only STOPPING them, but HURTING them. So I'm a line backer. I now know that if I wrap up and sack Brett Favre, I'll get a high five, a fist bump, and a butt slap. But instead, I'll lead with my head, or dive at his knee, because now I'll get those, plus 15k.
And if you want to make the argument "ah, 15k ain't crap to those guys" you are wrong. Rich people who used to be poor still think poor, and they want that money. They may P!ss it away at a strip club later, but they want it.
Posted 26 March 2012 - 04:27 PM
Its not really an argument as a statement of fact. Bounty or no bounty, players do and alway will try to knock other players out of the game via injury. Nothing will change in this regard. You can't stop it or change it.
You folks act like this hasn't been going on for 50 years. Sanctioned by the team. Not sanctioned. There is no difference. Giving a cash incentive for doing it is just what Williams chose to do. He didn't have to because those guys would be trying to knock players out anyway. That's the inherent nature of NFL defensive football. Now, you can find this deplorable. But it doesn't make anyone guilty of anything. It won't make anyone guilty next year either.
I fundamentally find the bounty issue par for the course for NFL football by its very nature. Exacting a harsh punishment over it is driven by politics and ego. It has nothing to do with the reality of NFL football. The punishment is as comical as it is oxymoronic. I find Goodell to be utterly out of touch with the sport he presides over.
Posted 26 March 2012 - 04:42 PM
What size is your tinfoil hat?
Posted 26 March 2012 - 05:02 PM
You're drawing conspiracy theorist from my comments? Wow.
Posted 26 March 2012 - 09:28 PM
Posted 26 March 2012 - 10:22 PM
It was more that you were so vehemently professing your version of reality. Reminds me of those with tinfoil hats.
Can we forget the violence aspect of this for a moment? I am not sure if you work, but if you were the big boss and your employees lied to you about leaving early or something minor. Then you called them on it with some evidence and they lied to you again, what would you do? Just let it slide. Nope, you would can them.
The Saints lied, they covered up, lied some more. They were not playing within the rules and got caught. Take your punishment.
Posted 26 March 2012 - 10:49 PM
Goodell's contract was reupped less than 3 months ago, and goes through 2018.Also, your boss and employee comparison doesn't work. Nobody for the Saints works for Roger Goodell. Goodell works for the NFL. He'll likely be fired by the NFL at the end of his contract or "resign".
Posted 26 March 2012 - 11:33 PM
Posted 27 March 2012 - 08:12 AM
Goodell's contract was reupped less than 3 months ago, and goes through 2018.
Posted 28 March 2012 - 05:46 AM
Goodell's contract was reupped less than 3 months ago, and goes through 2018.
Posted 28 March 2012 - 10:47 AM
Some did, obviously. They don't anymore, at least not blatantly, or they face fines and/or suspensions. You had a couple of rebels for a while there, but Goddell tamed them by hitting their wallets. It's a new reality, and yet I still find NFL games just as incredibly entertaining as I did before Goddell showed up.Its not my version of reality. It is reality. Defensive players on every team play to knock guys out of the game via injury.
Posted 29 March 2012 - 08:55 AM
Defensive players on every team play to knock guys out of the game via injury.
ahhh... see, that's the conundrum.Some did, obviously. They don't anymore,
Posted 29 March 2012 - 09:39 AM
Some did, obviously. They don't anymore, at least not blatantly, or they face fines and/or suspensions. You had a couple of rebels for a while there, but Goddell tamed them by hitting their wallets. It's a new reality, and yet I still find NFL games just as incredibly entertaining as I did before Goddell showed up.
The new emphasis on player safety doesn't bother me at all. When Goddell is gone, that emphasis will still remain -- it'd be a PR nightmare for the NFL to decide to roll back measures taken to reduce injuries.
Posted 29 March 2012 - 09:58 AM
the ego and lying with Goodell is a common theme with his big punishments.You still find the games entertaining because despite all the posturing by Goodell, NOTHING HAS CHANGED WITH REGARD TO PLAYERS TRYING TO INJURE OTHER PLAYERS. Its why the punishment is so absurdly over the top. It won't change anything fundamentally so there was no need for the severity. What happened was, Goodell took personal offense to being lied to. His ego got involved. So he went overboard. It wasn't business. It was personal. That's a bad commissioner. Plus, he speaks of competitive balance with cap maneuvers, but then whacks draft picks from the Saints and player suspensions the next minute. How are the Saints going to be competitive when they just got whacked for something every team in the NFL does by the very nature of the game. Its criminal.
The fact he even mentions being lied to is a joke. Who cares you were lied to Roger? He could've just said they broke a rule and the punishment followed. INstead we get him saying he was lied to over and over. As if that means something. As if that played a part and factored in. As if it means the punishment was worsened due to lying about it. Or worse, telling the truth means the punishment would be less??? There is no breakdown for punishments so you never know what you're going to get. What a mess. The message is, lie.
Who's going to tell this clown the truth? Its almost as if this clown thinks everyone he talks to isn't lying to him. What world is he living in. The system and his power is set up to be lied to about everything and anything because he's totally unregulated. That's a scary guy to be forthcoming and honest with.
Posted 29 March 2012 - 07:28 PM
I was thinking more in terms of guys like James Harrison. The line was that without the kill-shots, the game would suffer, and the blame would fall on Goddell, and I don't think the game has suffered.You still find the games entertaining because despite all the posturing by Goodell, NOTHING HAS CHANGED WITH REGARD TO PLAYERS TRYING TO INJURE OTHER PLAYERS.
Posted 05 April 2012 - 09:59 AM
The night before Gregg Williams’ final game as the New Orleans Saints’ defensive coordinator, the since-suspended coach gave a fiery speech to the team’s defensive players during which he made specific references to inflicting physical punishment upon several San Francisco 49ers in a postseason game the next day.
In the speech at the team’s hotel near the San Francisco Airport, Williams – according to documentary filmmaker Sean Pamphilon – at one point made a hand signal suggesting he would personally pay for a ferocious shot on 49ers quarterback Alex Smith.
Williams also referenced the prospect of his players inflicting a severe knee injury upon San Francisco wideout Michael Crabtree and exhorted them to “put a lick on” backup receiver Kyle Williams in an effort to “find out” if he was still suffering from the effects of a late-December concussion.
Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:41 AM
Source: Gregg Williams instructed Saints during speech to injure Niners offensive players
Link to the audio.
Man, I'm glad the 49ers won that game.
Posted 05 April 2012 - 11:05 AM
Just read this. I wanna see how many people still try to defend this turd now. I'm almost leaning towards the punishments not being severe enough.
Posted 05 April 2012 - 11:20 AM
I don't see how this should change anyones take on matter. Did you think he kindly asked his defense to go out there and hurt other players? You thought maybe he said politely and softspoken "Now, please try to put a good hurtin on Mr. Gore today, and if you do take him out I've got some candies for you."
Posted 05 April 2012 - 06:02 PM
C'mon man. There have been multiple comments coming to the defense of this bounty process. Most have been along the lines of 'it's just rhetoric' or 'the bark is worse than the bite, we would never go out there to purposely injure anyone'. I'm pretty sure this audio puts to rest any doubt that there were direct instructions to target specific players and specific body parts.
Posted 05 April 2012 - 06:18 PM
Really? Let's see what other players say about it. This was way over the line of physical football. This tape shows that this was not some isolated situation or where someone might misinterpret Williams' statements.Offensive plays are frequently called towards cb's or lb's that have injured ankles/knees lately to test them. You think that this type of thing wasn't going to happen with a defense that has already said paid bounties for injuries, there is no surprise in this audio, just the same bs that everyones been talking about for months now.
Posted 05 April 2012 - 06:43 PM
Posted 05 April 2012 - 07:16 PM
Posted 05 April 2012 - 07:31 PM
Have you been in NFL locker rooms on game day? Let's see what other players think.From a 9'ers fan, meh. The Saints are being made an example. I don't think any team would want their supposedly private meetings aired to the public. Some of this was over the top but, punishing one team this harshly for something that has been going on for decades is pretty weak. Most people would be shocked with the things that are said in locker rooms.
Stones, throwing, glass houses.. You know, that whole bit.
Posted 05 April 2012 - 07:51 PM
Have you been in NFL locker rooms on game day? Let's see what other players think.
Posted 05 April 2012 - 10:58 PM
Posted 06 April 2012 - 12:09 AM
The audio is definitely over the top, but so is the game. We're talking about 300+ lb men crashing into each other constantly.
Should players be paid specifically to try and hurt others? No, I have to agree with the league's position there. But the spin job that the league and numerous writers have tried to put on it: "It's reprehensible! It's the most horrific thing to happen in the game! It must never happen again!" ... that's completely ludicrous. This is a violent game ... they want to try and put this nice & clean wrapper on and pretend football isn't violent & dangerous. "Honest, no one is trying to hurt anyone or intimidate anyone! It's all just fun and games and candy!"
The worst thing is, they don't even believe the position they are taking. They just want the veneer of safety and concern to help with their current lawsuits against injured/concussed players and help with their image. It's all about the money to Mr. Goodell and (most) of the owners. The Saints (I'm not a fan, besides Brees) are taking the fall for the league's bottom line, that's all.