Things were going well right up til '06....................when Pelosi and Reid started running Congress.
Hmmmmmm...........
I blame the Republican party for every dollar of debt we've accrued since they took over the House of Reps.
Posted 13 March 2012 - 09:54 AM
Things were going well right up til '06....................when Pelosi and Reid started running Congress.
Hmmmmmm...........
Posted 13 March 2012 - 10:02 AM
Posted 13 March 2012 - 10:05 AM
I don't think the employment situation has ever been worse in my lifetime. At last tally, there were maybe three people on my block that still had jobs, including me. The stunning thing is the amount of union people who have been laid off in the past few months. One of my neighbors got turned down for a job selling knives door to door. Too many applicants. Convenience stores won't even take your applications anymore. Anyone that is telling you the economy and/or employment is improving doesn't know d!ck.
Posted 13 March 2012 - 10:08 AM
Good for you.
Posted 13 March 2012 - 10:12 AM
The Rep congress passed a budget that attempted to get spending under control. The Senate never even brought it up for a vote. In fact, the Demwit Senate hasn't passed a budget since your Hero took over.I guess you only blame Congress when the Dems control the purse strings.
Shocker. We all thought you had principles.
Posted 13 March 2012 - 10:17 AM
The Rep congress passed a budget that attempted to get spending under control. The Senate never even brought it up for a vote. In fact, the Demwit Senate hasn't passed a budget since your Hero took over.
Feel free to blame anyone you want.
Posted 13 March 2012 - 11:46 AM
i think it's good that hiring is up in the service industry, and also that more people who had stopped looking for work have started looking again.[republicans] This is still a result of part-time Christmas season hires [republicans]
“You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift, help small men by tearing down big men, strengthen the weak by weakening the strong, lift the wage-earner by pulling down the wage-payer, help the poor by destroying the rich, establish security on borrowed money, or help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.” —William J. H. Boetcker
Posted 13 March 2012 - 12:33 PM
At last tally, there were maybe three people on my block that still had jobs, including me.
Posted 13 March 2012 - 01:25 PM
That's because you live in a filthy, rat-infested sh!thole.
Posted 06 April 2012 - 07:04 AM
120,000 jobs added in March. Unemployment down to 8.2%
Conservturds, please enlighten us as to how this is actually bad.![]()
link
Posted 06 April 2012 - 07:05 AM
120,000 jobs added in March. Unemployment down to 8.2%
Conservturds, please enlighten us as to how this is actually bad.![]()
link
Posted 06 April 2012 - 09:21 AM
120,000 jobs added in March. Unemployment down to 8.2%
Conservturds, please enlighten us as to how this is actually bad.![]()
link
Posted 06 April 2012 - 11:12 AM
Posted 06 April 2012 - 11:34 AM
If the size of the workforce used to calculate the unemployment rate were the same today as it was the day our White-African-American POTUS took office, the unemployment rate today would be 10.9%.
Keep taking people out of the equation to fudge the numbers seems to be how Summer Of Recovery 3.0 is gonna happen.
Posted 06 April 2012 - 01:15 PM
Employers added 120,000 jobs in the month, the Labor Department reported Friday, falling far short of economists' expectations. The number marked a significant slowdown in hiring from February, when the economy added 240,000 jobs.
"It's discouraging that job growth was half of what it had been the previous month," said Christine Owens, executive director of the National Employment Law Project.
Job growth of around 120,000 is just about enough to keep up with population growth, and is therefore more like "treading water" than a major improvement, Owens said.
Meanwhile, the unemployment rate fell to 8.2% as the labor force shrank by 164,000 workers, mostly due to white women leaving the job market.
My link
Posted 06 April 2012 - 01:16 PM
That's not where the drop in the labor pool is coming from.Starting 1-1-11 a baby boomer will retire every 10 seconds for the next 20 years. 76 million of them.
Posted 06 April 2012 - 01:40 PM
Posted 06 April 2012 - 01:48 PM
That's not where the drop in the labor pool is coming from.
Posted 06 April 2012 - 01:51 PM
That's not what I said. I said that's not the reason the labor pool number has dropped.So when people retire the stay in the labor pool.
Posted 06 April 2012 - 02:03 PM
All my flavors are guranteed to satisfy.
Posted 06 April 2012 - 02:45 PM
http://blog.american...-sure-aint-8-2/
Interesting numbers about the real unemployment rate.
Recall that back in 2009, White House economists Jared Bernstein and Christina Romer used their old-fashioned Keynesian model to predict how the $800 billion stimulus would affect employment. According to their model—as displayed in the above chart, updated—unemployment should be around 5.8% today.
Posted 06 April 2012 - 04:02 PM
White women leaving the workforce? Did I miss something?
The unemployment rate fell to a three-year low of 8.2% in March, but it wasn't because more Americans found jobs. Instead, thousands of people dropped out of the labor market.
Who were those people?
White women, mainly.
Roughly 136,000 white women left the labor force in March. Their participation in the job market has been slowly dropping since mid 2009, and now it's at levels not seen since 1996.
In contrast, white men have also recently left the labor force, but not nearly as dramatically in March. And blacks of both genders have been wading back into the job market. (The Labor Department doesn't collect seasonally adjusted data on Hispanics and Asians).
Why are white women leaving? Unfortunately, it's impossible to tell from the Labor Department's data. Reasons could include going back to school, retiring, staying home to take care of family or having a disability.
Or perhaps they're just giving up on the job market altogether.