Anyone ready for adults to be in the White House?
#1
Posted 25 April 2012 - 06:23 PM
I'm simply saying that the argument of "It's in the constitution, thus that right must be defended" is silly.---cbfalcon
#2
Posted 25 April 2012 - 06:34 PM
#3
Posted 25 April 2012 - 06:36 PM
I'm simply saying that the argument of "It's in the constitution, thus that right must be defended" is silly.---cbfalcon
#4
Posted 26 April 2012 - 04:29 AM
Lol. No one on this entire message board references more polls than you. Funny how they become meaningless when they don't show the results you want. Hypocrisy v 143.0Polls in April.....
![]()
![]()
![]()
#5
Posted 26 April 2012 - 05:55 AM
#6
Posted 26 April 2012 - 06:19 AM
Unfortunately, its no different than pretty much every other of the POS politicians out there. They're all focking horrible.changing position on virtually every issue for political expediency is adult?
#7
Posted 26 April 2012 - 06:49 AM
I was not for Mitt Romney in the GOP primary, but an admitted Obama supporter calling out Mitt Romney for flip flopping is akin to Barry Bonds calling Mark McGwire a 'cheater'.changing position on virtually every issue for political expediency is adult?
"Only a life lived for others is a life worthwhile." – Albert Einstein
Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
#8
Posted 26 April 2012 - 06:57 AM
changing position on virtually every issue for political expediency is adult?
No, but breaking into song as you ride your choreographed dancing horsey is.
#9
Posted 26 April 2012 - 07:19 AM
Link to me touting polls 6 months away from an election as having any meaning to said election?Lol. No one on this entire message board references more polls than you. Funny how they become meaningless when they don't show the results you want. Hypocrisy v 143.0
I'm simply saying that the argument of "It's in the constitution, thus that right must be defended" is silly.---cbfalcon
#10
Posted 26 April 2012 - 07:26 AM
First off, fock you. You know that you're the fetch b!tch around here. I don't search foir sh!t. Especially for you.Link to me touting polls 6 months away from an election as having any meaning to said election?
That being said, I'm not talking about a specific pol. I'm talking about polls in general. You are Mr public opinion poll. For three years, you've been posting these irrelevant poll results. And I said teh same thing every time- that they should hold an election to see how people really feel. But now there's a poll that shows a result that you don't like, and it's you doing the laughing. I just think the irony is hilarious. But then again, I've always found your hypocrisy to be a riot.
#11
Posted 26 April 2012 - 07:27 AM
Nothing, as usual. All talk, zero facts to back up the talk. Good way to start the day, Mr. Perfect Life.First off, fock you. You know that you're the fetch b!tch around here. I don't search foir sh!t. Especially for you.
That being said, I'm not talking about a specific pol. I'm talking about polls in general. You are Mr public opinion poll. For three years, you've been posting these irrelevant poll results. And I said teh same thing every time- that they should hold an election to see how people really feel. But now there's a poll that shows a result that you don't like, and it's you doing the laughing. I just think the irony is hilarious. But then again, I've always found your hypocrisy to be a riot.
I'm simply saying that the argument of "It's in the constitution, thus that right must be defended" is silly.---cbfalcon
#12
Posted 26 April 2012 - 07:36 AM
#13
Posted 26 April 2012 - 07:46 AM
Do you just have that reply saved for when I own your ass time and time again? YOu know that every word I said was accurate. Just because I'm not a messageboard loser who saves threads or spends hours doing searches, doesn't mean sh!t. You know you're Mr poll. As long as the poll supports your agenda. Too bad that in this case, it doesn't. Boo focking hoo.Nothing, as usual. All talk, zero facts to back up the talk. Good way to start the day, Mr. Perfect Life.
#14
Posted 26 April 2012 - 07:46 AM
The modem at his mom's house was down. No internet in the basement.######, looks like RP came back, been a nice couple of days
#15
Posted 26 April 2012 - 07:53 AM
Do you just have that reply saved for when I own your ass time and time again? YOu know that every word I said was accurate. Just because I'm not a messageboard loser who saves threads or spends hours doing searches, doesn't mean sh!t. You know you're Mr poll. As long as the poll supports your agenda. Too bad that in this case, it doesn't. Boo focking hoo.
Mebbe you should bet your buttbrother MDC to go through my threads he has cataloged since you are too lazy to back up your claims. Even he won't have a category called "Polls RP touts 6 months from an election".
I'm simply saying that the argument of "It's in the constitution, thus that right must be defended" is silly.---cbfalcon
#16
Posted 26 April 2012 - 08:02 AM
I'm not too lazy. I just don't live and die with this sh!t the way you do. I have absolutely zero desire to do a search to look for something that everyone here knows exists. Are you claiming that you never started a thread based on poll results? Is that your claim?Mebbe you should bet your buttbrother MDC to go through my threads he has cataloged since you are too lazy to back up your claims. Even he won't have a category called "Polls RP touts 6 months from an election".
#17
Posted 26 April 2012 - 08:09 AM
I'm not too lazy. I just don't live and die with this sh!t the way you do. I have absolutely zero desire to do a search to look for something that everyone here knows exists. Are you claiming that you never started a thread based on poll results? Is that your claim?
Crassic Newbie. Get caught unable to back up claims and you start moving the goal posts. I didn't say I have never started a thread about polls, Sport. I said I have never put stock in a poll 6 months out from an election. Try reading my posts several times if that's what it takes for you to understand them.
I'm simply saying that the argument of "It's in the constitution, thus that right must be defended" is silly.---cbfalcon
#18
Posted 26 April 2012 - 08:12 AM
Link to me touting polls 6 months away from an election as having any meaning to said election?
Crassic Newbie. Get caught unable to back up claims and you start moving the goal posts. I didn't say I have never started a thread about polls, Sport. I said I have never put stock in a poll 6 months out from an election. Try reading my posts several times if that's what it takes for you to understand them.
Classic RP, creates a strawman arguement and expects someone to disprove it.
#19
Posted 26 April 2012 - 08:15 AM
You have it backwards, Simpleton. Newbie made a claim, I asked him to prove it. He has failed as badly as your post here.Classic RP, creates a strawman arguement and expects someone to disprove it.
HTH
I'm simply saying that the argument of "It's in the constitution, thus that right must be defended" is silly.---cbfalcon
#20
Posted 26 April 2012 - 08:22 AM
Looks like Sybil Pilot logged in as Rusty for a few days, had a conversation with his alter-ego and then reverted back into his dooshier form.
Fixed
#21
Posted 26 April 2012 - 08:22 AM
You have it backwards, Simpleton. Newbie made a claim, I asked him to prove it. He has failed as badly as your post here.
HTH
Lol. No one on this entire message board references more polls than you. Funny how they become meaningless when they don't show the results you want. Hypocrisy v 143.0
Link to me touting polls 6 months away from an election as having any meaning to said election?
Don't see anything about elections polls in his post. You might want to ask the wizard for a brain, Strawman.
#22
Posted 26 April 2012 - 08:30 AM
My post was referencing Shovelbrain's post:Don't see anything about elections polls in his post. You might want to ask the wizard for a brain, Strawman.
Judging from the latest polls, apparently not. I cannot WAIT for this slaughter! < Obama
See, he was touting polls months away from an election that have the lead within the margin of error in most cases. Then Newbie came into the thread to
You may want to get that wizard on speed dial, Sport.
I'm simply saying that the argument of "It's in the constitution, thus that right must be defended" is silly.---cbfalcon
#23
Posted 26 April 2012 - 09:35 AM
######, looks like RP came back, been a nice couple of days
I was kind of hoping he'd gotten hit by a bus.
#24
Posted 26 April 2012 - 09:41 AM
Another shining example of the tolerance Libs are always touting.I was kind of hoping he'd gotten hit by a bus.
I'm simply saying that the argument of "It's in the constitution, thus that right must be defended" is silly.---cbfalcon
#25
Posted 26 April 2012 - 10:43 AM
#26
Posted 26 April 2012 - 03:55 PM
I'm ready for the Republicans to actually nominate a Republican. There hasn't been one since Reagan, unless you count Clinton.
Reagan wasn't a republican either by modern day crazy right winger standards.
-- Voltaire (The French one, not the Chinese one)
#27
Posted 26 April 2012 - 04:08 PM
cutting taxes and ending the cold war are both republican tenants. why are both of those not priorities to democrats as well?Reagan wasn't a republican either by modern day crazy right winger standards.
“You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift, help small men by tearing down big men, strengthen the weak by weakening the strong, lift the wage-earner by pulling down the wage-payer, help the poor by destroying the rich, establish security on borrowed money, or help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.” —William J. H. Boetcker
#28
Posted 26 April 2012 - 05:44 PM
cutting taxes and ending the cold war are both republican tenants. why are both of those not priorities to democrats as well?
He also blew up the deficit and engaged in diplomacy with the USSR like a Neville Chamberlain pussie.
#29
Posted 26 April 2012 - 05:46 PM
He also blew up the deficit and engaged in diplomacy with the USSR like a Neville Chamberlain pussie.
His deficits were miniscule compared to your Hero. Oh, and what is the USSR up to these days after Reagan's "pussie" diplomacy?
I'm simply saying that the argument of "It's in the constitution, thus that right must be defended" is silly.---cbfalcon
#30
Posted 26 April 2012 - 05:54 PM
yes, the deficit went up as a result of the military buildup. we discussed that yesterday. it also sustained jobs all the way through the 1990s. so amortize it and see if it worked out.He also blew up the deficit and engaged in diplomacy with the USSR like a Neville Chamberlain pussie.
i don't know who that person is you reference, but if he turned 2 superpowers into 1, then yes.
“You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift, help small men by tearing down big men, strengthen the weak by weakening the strong, lift the wage-earner by pulling down the wage-payer, help the poor by destroying the rich, establish security on borrowed money, or help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.” —William J. H. Boetcker
#31
Posted 26 April 2012 - 06:17 PM
I'm simply saying that the argument of "It's in the constitution, thus that right must be defended" is silly.---cbfalcon
#32
Posted 26 April 2012 - 06:20 PM
He also blew up the deficit and engaged in diplomacy with the USSR like a Neville Chamberlain pussie.
He also sold arms to Iran and raised taxes.
ROLL TIDE ROLL!!
#33
Posted 26 April 2012 - 06:40 PM
marginal rates went down, closed corporate loopholes which also raised corporate tax revenues. don't we sell arms to everyone?He also sold arms to Iran and raised taxes.
“You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift, help small men by tearing down big men, strengthen the weak by weakening the strong, lift the wage-earner by pulling down the wage-payer, help the poor by destroying the rich, establish security on borrowed money, or help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.” —William J. H. Boetcker
#34
Posted 29 April 2012 - 09:26 AM
letterman, leno and a possible SNL appearance.
was the point of this thread to make yourself look more retarded?
- NY Jets go 13-3 and win the AFC east (wrong)
- Sanchez and Tebow makes the AFC ProBowl roster (wrong)
- No rookie QBs will finish in the top 15 @ the QB position using FFToday scoring (way wrong)
- NE Patriots will not make playoffs (wrong)
edit: Oh well. Not too good. I'll try harder next year!
J-E-T-S! Jets! Jets! Jets!
Rex is the best coach in the NFL.
#35
Posted 29 April 2012 - 10:13 PM
Obama doing these late night talk shows is not presidential, which is nothing new for him. Just because Romney does it too(If he does) doesn't magically change that fact. Plus, Romney is not the president.http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/04/26/mitt-romney-not-yet-decided-on-snl-cameo-wife-ann-says/
letterman, leno and a possible SNL appearance.
was the point of this thread to make yourself look more retarded?
#36
Posted 29 April 2012 - 10:37 PM
Changing your mind / position is called growth. Obama flat out lies about practically EVERYTHING, i can't believe you folks fall for his bull.changing position on virtually every issue for political expediency is adult?
#37
Posted 29 April 2012 - 10:42 PM
Exactly!Another shining example of the tolerance Libs are always touting.
But if you're a Mooslim Terrorist or an Illegal Alien they give you front row tickets to the "Great Anti American Obama / Oprah Giveaway Spectacular", funded of course by evil rich white men.
#38
Posted 29 April 2012 - 11:21 PM
Obama doing these late night talk shows is not presidential, which is nothing new for him. Just because Romney does it too(If he does) doesn't magically change that fact. Plus, Romney is not the president.
this thread has a title asking if anyone is ready for adults to be in the white house. Insinuating that the Obama's do not act like adults and the Romney's do/will. Inside is a video of Mitt Romney giving a serious political speech while Obama is on Fallon.
Mitt Romney has appeared on multiple late night talk shows and will possibly be making an SNL appearance.
Where is the basis for this thread?
Once again, I am not a huge Obama fan. What I am a fan of is consistency. There is none in this topic.
- NY Jets go 13-3 and win the AFC east (wrong)
- Sanchez and Tebow makes the AFC ProBowl roster (wrong)
- No rookie QBs will finish in the top 15 @ the QB position using FFToday scoring (way wrong)
- NE Patriots will not make playoffs (wrong)
edit: Oh well. Not too good. I'll try harder next year!
J-E-T-S! Jets! Jets! Jets!
Rex is the best coach in the NFL.
#39
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:12 AM
Going on as a sitting President to do some Foshizzle slow rap, or whateverthefuck that was, is another. Obama is clueless when it comes to the dignity of the office. Hell, Bush quit playing golf the minute troops went into combat. Last time I checked we still have men getting killed on the battlefield, and Snoopbama is clowning with Jimmy Fallon.
I'm simply saying that the argument of "It's in the constitution, thus that right must be defended" is silly.---cbfalcon
#40
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:16 AM
Going on late night talk shows for an interview is one thing, especially as a candidate.
Going on as a sitting President to do some Foshizzle slow rap, or whateverthefuck that was, is another. Obama is clueless when it comes to the dignity of the office. Hell, Bush quit playing golf the minute troops went into combat. Last time I checked we still have men getting killed on the battlefield, and Snoopbama is clowning with Jimmy Fallon.
Yeah, Bush was class personified. His seventh grade intelligence. His puking on foreighn dignitaries. His having people throwing shoes at him. Stumbling over big words. Yeah, if only Obama could be as dignified as Bush. hehehe










