11 replies to this topic

[uwilose123]

non ppr league, 4 pts per passing tds

QB- Brees, Vick, RG3
RB - Forte, Ridley, Benson, Ingram
WR - Cruz, Welker, Moss
TE - Finley



Another owner has M Bush and offered my choice of either M Bush or S Green for my choice of Vick or RG3. Thinking of going M Bush for RG3? No brainer to lock up Bears backfield?

[Steel_City]

I'd take Bush for Vick.

[fingerbang!!]

I would take Bush for RGIII given your roster - and yes I think it is a no brainer.

[slestack]

It seems that RG3 has more upside than Vick. If you wait on RG3, he may yield more trade value down the road as he proves it's not just one fluke week. I'd trade Vick for Bush.

Please see mine: http://www.fftodayfo...howtopic=407069

[cdogge]

Without a doubt I'd probably trade either one for Bush... Only because you really never need 3 QB's on your roster.

Please see mine:
http://www.fftodayfo...howtopic=407072

[throttlers]

Personally I think you can get better for RG3 if you shop around. If not, I would trade him for Bush.

see mine http://www.fftodayfo...howtopic=407073

[minuteofdecay]

Trade vick for bush

[goodnight]

trade vick for bush

[indianscavsbrowns]

Vick for Bush

[PujolsJunkie]

RGIII for Bush. Do you start 2 QBs? If not, no reason to have this alignment anyway.

Help me with mine!

[goodnight]

trade vick for bush. then you will still have rg3 who has a wider range of trade value and more hype to trade for someone else later if you need too.

[PrinceEatMeat]

I'd dump Vick for Bush. RG3 will be a lot more valuable down the road. Take what you can get for Vick now.

Please help with mine!
http://www.fftodayfo...howtopic=407150