Kanil

I see many, many more news articles about the good things police do than bad. And I know most people admire and respect officers. There's a vocal minority (magnified by the ease of spreading your viewpoint) and confirmation bias skewing how bad it is today versus the past. That said, I wouldn't want to be a police officer either. Mostly because once I got out of the military I decided to do whatever gave me the least chance of getting shot at.

I think all publicly elected officials should have to provide their tax returns to someone who is tasked with oversite to ensure there are no conflicts of interest but they should never be released to the general public. Even the President has a right to privacy here. However, in this case I think what the dems want to see them, perform some crowd-sourced audit to find every miniscule thing that could be taken as wrong, and turn it into a massive huge deal. This is the true witch hunt. I wonder how many of these governors/congressmen/senators have released their own tax info? I'd bet it's not even close to 100%.

Damn... the one time I'm competing on Sunday I'm unable to watch... going back through the thread was fun though!

Numbered them again so you know what I'm responding to: 1. And how was it all proven? The answer is by investigating. Good thing we investigated! 2. I can't see pics that are on the normal pic sharing sites at work.

Added numbers to your original quote so you know what I'm responding to. 1. You can't prove a negative. The burden of proof is on the person saying something exists. Take the list of ALL of things he's said (not just the ones that he was right on), along with the mountainous list of just rambling nonsense and show us where they came true. Getting the list should be easy as he essentially gives bullet points in each of his tweets. If it makes it easier, you can start with the list I posted last year and quoted yesterday (or maybe the day before, I don't remember). 2. Let's see it. And it should be conclusive, not something vague that you have to make logical leaps to get to. 3. I'll answer this but let's be clear, this question has absolutely zero to do with whether or not Q Anon is legit... I don't believe Trump was involved in collusion with Russia. I never though he did but I thought there was enough smoke out there with some of the higher ups in his campaign to warrant an investigation.

The one I played was actually down in (or near) Dallas. My uncle used to live in Flower Mound and when I was in the Air Force I went to hang out with him every Thanksgiving.

We're not proving ONE thing wrong. It's 90%+. You're taking one thing right and saying it's legit. That's what's ludicrous.

So if I make 10 claims, and 1 of them comes true (and 9 don't) then I'd be a "partially legit" insider also?

Has anyone taken any time to put together a list of every one of Qs predictions? I'd bet less than 10% have come true. I don't actually care enough to do it myself but there's got to be someone out there that's done it, right?

FYI - 20 years ago I played one of those "Tour 18" replica courses that had a replica of 17. My first shot landed 8 feet from the stick* so I don't understand how these so called "pros" keep getting wet. Losers. *3putted

I tell you what. I'll answer those questions (again) if you can tell me how the answers to any of those questions validate Q Anon as being a legitimate insider.

18-25 year olds don't vote. What makes you think 16 year olds will?

Don't like him... Primary: Beto O'Rourke - At least he's not Bernie General: Beto O'Rourke - At least he's not Trump

According to the posters in this thread... things "heated up" over a year ago. None of that "heat" has come true. There may be things that happen but I think it's conclusive that Q Anon is spouting off hundreds (if not thousands) of predictions hoping some of them come true. Classic "psychic" scam that you rubes are scrambling to fall for. One piece of advice... DON'T SEND Q YOUR LIFE SAVINGS, even if he promises to use it to personally see to the execution of Hillary/Obama/Mueller/Ginsburg/Beto.

The first 14 questions I asked were rhetorical. I think we can all confidently say the answer to OPs questions is that Q is fake. The last question though, is one I won't find on google. Can you answer that one?