Gators69

Anyone feel good about his outlook for rest of season? He had a good week last week, but is essentially in a timeshare with Forte (when healthy) and McGuire. Someone in my PPR league dropped Powell before last week's game, so I'm comtemplating to put a waiver wire claim for him over L Murray since I hold the 1st waiver position. PPR league. Thoughts?

Thanks for the feedback!

Would you still venture to say that Powell is a better ROS stash in PPR than L Murray? I am in need of a RB after losing Carson, and have the 1st waiver spot. The guy that has the 2nd waiver spot lost Cook, and would definitely pick up Murray if I pass on him.

Someone dropped Powell last week in my league. Is he a better pick up (PPR) than Murray?

Anybody else think this guy could be a waiver wire steal for anyone who missed out on the top 3 kickers? Hit two 52 yarders, a 43 yarder, and a 20 yard chip shot. The long field goals split the uprights down the middle. He looks good and I think he doesn't give the kicker job back to fat a** Sebastian. I just put in a claim for this guy over Mr 'extra points' Crosby who had been my kicker.

In PPR league, I was offered AJ and Martavis for Crabtree and Howard. My team: RB: Hunt, Murray, Howard, West WR: M Thomas, Allen, Crabtree, C Coleman, Cobb We start 2 RB and 4 WR or 3 RB and 3 WR... Thoughts on if this is a good trade for me?

Just curious, what K did you cut for him?

This guy in my league is the commissioner and a team owner. He drafted DJ and said he is quitting and turning the league over to someone else in the league because he's pissed over the injury to his first round pick. He has the league money and said he would give it all back you everyone, but he's not paying his entry fee $200. Has anyone ever run into such a bizarre situation like this before in a league?

K Allen @ Denver A Rob @ Houston standard scoring with 1 point PPR

I'd go with Garcon. I expect Carolina to be running most of the game, and protecting a lead. SF should have to throw often and Garcon should get a lot of targets.

Drafted 1st in 8 team league, standard, 6 pts all TDs and 1 point for PPR QB: Brees, Prescott RB: DJ, Murray, Howard, Hunt, Henry, T West WR: M Thomas, K Allen, M Crabtree, A Robinson, C Coleman, R Cobb TE: D Walker K: M Crosby D/ST: Denver

Bump

I purchased and am using the Draft Buddy excel. I entered my league's scoring, options for league and roster size, and then action to check for update and update projections. I am in a 8-team standard scoring league, and the top overall rankings were: RB David Johnson ARI 8 292.2 148.3 1.01 RB Le'Veon Bell PIT 9 257.8 113.9 1.02 QB Aaron Rodgers GB 8 429.2 85.7 2.09 WR Odell Beckham Jr. NYG 8 217.2 74.2 1.06 WR Antonio Brown PIT 9 212.4 69.4 1.04 RB LeSean McCoy BUF 6 212.8 68.9 1.05 WR Julio Jones ATL 5 209.6 66.6 1.05 RB Devonta Freeman ATL 5 209.1 65.2 1.08 QB Tom Brady NE 9 406.4 62.8 3.08 Sorry for such a novice question here, but is the Draft Buddy suggesting that the 3rd pick in an 8 team draft is suggested to be Aaron Rodgers, because he has the 3rd highest value after Johnson and Bell, or should I be applying different logic in interpreting these results? I just want to make sure I am understanding and analyzing the results correctly because it seems unusual to advocate picking a QB with the 3rd pick of an 8 team standard draft. Thanks in advance.

Yes. that makes sense. I would categorize my league mates as being in the middle (partial very skilled/partial casual). There are some people in this league that do favor QB's more and would reach for one than maybe in all skill league. I know last year Rodgers was the first QB off the board but not until 3.08, which makes me feel pretty good that I would be able to get Rodgers or possibly even Brady (who I don't have that far behind Rodgers) at the 2.08/3.01 turn. Gronk has in some years gone mid 2nd, there are a few owners that covet him, but his ADP has him going later this year than in previous, so there is a chance he could still be there at the 2.08/3.01 turn. I was able to get Carlos Hyde in the 10th round last year, I could see that maybe happening (maybe not 10th round) but going a lot later than usual after rookies (Lamar Miller, Hyde, Ingram, etc) so there should be some value there. My ideal scenario would be Rodgers or Brady/Gronk at the turn, or Rodgers or Brady/BPA, or if I miss out on both QB's then just go best WR/RB/TE until round 4 and take Brees at 5:01.

Thanks for the info, Mike. I really appreciate it. I actually have first pick in the draft (standard) and am going David Johnson so based on what I am seeing I am leaning towards going Rodgers and Gronk at the 2/3 turn and then look to RB/WR in the next rounds. Going Rodgers/Gronk should give me more of an advantage than going best WR/WR (like Dez/Baldwin) or RB/WR (like Gurley/Dez). I have just heard so much this year on the importance of waiting until later to get your QB/TE, but in such a small league like this I guess the risk is mitigated substantially.

Sidney Rice =

I am seeing conflicting reports about this week's SNF game. NFL.com shows that the SNF game is Eagles/NYG. However, I see things like this that make me wonder: Nov 17, 2010 4:42 pm Jacob Tamme is not listed on the Colts' Week 11 injury report. Fantasy Source Spin: The Indianapolis Star reported earlier in the week that Tamme "could barely walk" due to a back injury after last Sunday's win over Cincinnati. It appears Tamme will be good to go for Sunday Night Football against New England. Has the Colts/NE game been switched in as the flex scheduling game?

This game led to one of the craziest fantasy games I've had in 15 years. I was up 6 and done going into last night, and my opponent had Hernandez and Jeff Reed. I thought for sure I was done. Hernandez ate the doughnut, and Reed misses the cheap shot FG of 26 yds. So our league is -2 for missing FG's under 30 yds, so Reed ends up with 2 points. I win by 4. He makes that FG and it's a 5 point swing, and I lose. Sometimes it is better to be lucky than good.

This game led to one of the craziest fantasy games I've had in 15 years. I was up 6 and done going into last night, and my opponent had Hernandez and Jeff Reed. I thought for sure I was done. Hernandez at the doughnut, and Reed misses the cheap shot FG of 26 yds. So our league is -2 for missing FG's under 30 yds, so Reed ends up with 2 points. He makes that FG and it's a 5 point swing, and I lose. Sometimes it is better to be lucky than good.

GB Defense... what a MASH unit, and they pinch a shutout on the road against the Jets. Benched them for the Seahawks, 2 measly fantasy points but primarily Kenny Britt. For focking me last week for not playing him, and this week when I start him he hurts his vajina in the 1st qtr and doesn't come back in...

Does Heath Miller even have a target? Fock..

Rivers has been my boy this season, but I am nervous as he11 about his matchup after watching the Rams torch through the SD offensive line last week. I am rolling with Orton vs Oakland. Who you got?

Tough decision here, but I think I'll be benching him for Tolbert. Tolbert should get the lion share of carries against a baby soft Raiders D, and SD seems willing to ease Mathews back into action. While Bradshaw is banged up and missing a couple OL. What is your situation?

Torn between who to start between Bradshaw and Tolbert. Bradshaw has a good matchup against the Texans, but he's dinged and missing some key OL people. Tolbert I'm concerned about how many touches since he is sharing with Mathews. Any suggestions? Just leave a link and I will help in return.. thanks

I am actually not as concerned about Bradshaw himself, as I am about O'Hara and Hedgecock being ruled out. There is going to me a major reshuffle along the OL, plus Cushing is due to be back for this game. This makes me seriously want to lean on Tolbert. Oakland has the worst run D in the league, and SD should be up big. With Mathews hurting, I can see Tolbert getting a ton of carries and all of the 4th quarter work.