Jump to content
Baker Boy

Liberal America- what they have created.

Recommended Posts

According to 2014 statistics, crime in the United States is the lowest it has been in 40 years.

Thanks Obama!

it's 2017, how are the stats in his home town ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a sweeping generalization the OP makes that liberals created whatever is going on in his hometown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So why didnt B Hussein Obama ever cite this?

 

He did, you weren't listening.

(And of course the drop in crime is not likely to have anything to do with Obama anymore than the increase crime the OP mentioned had anything to do with liberals.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An inspector general audit has identified more than $500 billion in "errors corrected" in the notes and financial statements for the Department of Housing and Urban Development under the Obama administration.

According to the report released in March, HUD reissued financial statements for fiscal 2015 and 2016 "due to pervasive material errors that we identified." Those errors were contained in a November filing.

"The total amounts of errors corrected in HUD’s notes and consolidated financial statements were $516.4 billion and $3.4 billion, respectively," the IG said.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/10/watchdog-calls-out-hud-for-500b-plus-in-accounting-errors.html

 

Most likely just plain ole fraud that has been going on for decades.

This is where I strongly agree with Republicans.

We think we are helping by providing social services, but in fact the poor get barely crumbs of the cake of all the money set aside for aid such as housing.

It's a big racket. People are ripping of the tax payer under the guise of helping the poor with subsidized housing.

I was poor as heck and could never get subsidized housing.

Yet, there would be apartments in NYC that were subsidized that were in fact in the hands of the rich.

Or apartment buildings owned by someone that got rent subsidies that were totally dilapidated.

It's funny, you'd drive by the poorest sections in urban neighborhoods and not realize that those apartments cost top dollar to live in because the owners charge an arm and a leg because the government was footing the bill.

The poor people living inside wouldn't have heat, the floors would have holes, if there was paint it was lead paint, the windows would be nailed shut, no one removed the trash, rat and roach infested because the owners collected the rent but never kept up the buildings.

So, I agree that throwing money at a problem isn't always a solution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to 2014 statistics, crime in the United States is the lowest it has been in 40 years.

Thanks Obama!

So there was a 40% drop from 2009-2013? You don't know how stats work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Argue with the statistician, not me.

The articles I've read said that crime rates are low, lower than what they've been in decades past.

GRAPH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Argue with the statistician, not me.

The articles I've read said that crime rates are low, lower than what they've been in decades past.

GRAPH

 

From that graph, it looks like it has been trending down since about 1993, Obama was what 32?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

He did, you weren't listening.

(And of course the drop in crime is not likely to have anything to do with Obama anymore than the increase crime the OP mentioned had anything to do with liberals.)

I guess he drowned that message out by screaming about how rascist the country is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

From that graph, it looks like it has been trending down since about 1993, Obama was what 32?

 

You guys don't read do you?

The drop in crime has nothing to do with Obama.

However, stating that gang violence is the fault of liberal policies is ignoring that crime rates have gone down drastically over the years.

Probably, just due to people not doing as much coke/crack.

It's easier to raid Grandma's stash of Percocet or Mom's Xanax.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to 2014 statistics, crime in the United States is the lowest it has been in 40 years.

Thanks Obama!

You realize that was because gun ownership and concealed carry permits were skyrocketing. Armed society = safer society

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Chicago is proof that the experiment of gun control does not work.

Think bigger, like gun regulation as it relates to gun-related deaths/injury per capita throughout the US, or the world for that matter. With few exceptions, less guns/more regulation = less gun violence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think bigger, like gun regulation as it relates to gun-related deaths/injury per capita throughout the US, or the world for that matter. With few exceptions, less guns/more regulation = less gun violence.

 

Eh, if you take out the wannabe gangster black-on-black gun crimes, it is such a small insignificant problem. There is a group of people that have access to firearms that make those statistics seem much worse than they actually are. Just calling a spade a spade.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Eh, if you take out the wannabe gangster black-on-black gun crimes, it is such a small insignificant problem. There is a group of people that have access to firearms that make those statistics seem much worse than they actually are. Just calling a spade a spade.

Exactly. The AA's throw all these stats out of whack.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it's 2017, how are the stats in his home town ?

Kenya is one of the least violent African countries, so Obama is Ok there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why can't people see "Gun Control" is only about limiting access to guns by those that can legally own them? Criminals will continue getting them illegally (stealing, trading drugs for them, etc..) while lawful citizens will be left unable to buy the to defend themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why can't people see "Gun Control" is only about limiting access to guns by those that can legally own them? Criminals will continue getting them illegally (stealing, trading drugs for them, etc..) while lawful citizens will be left unable to buy the to defend themselves.

With few exceptions, areas with more gun control/restriction have less gun related violence/deaths. The idea that gun ownership makes one safer is misguided.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Eh, if you take out the wannabe gangster black-on-black gun crimes, it is such a small insignificant problem. There is a group of people that have access to firearms that make those statistics seem much worse than they actually are. Just calling a spade a spade.

Overall, the US has relatively lax gun regulation and high gun ownership, yet violent crime is higher here than much of the developed world. You can blame it on the "spades", but I think the problem is far more complex.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

someone wrote an article trying to figure out why crime has gone down.

i think they said it was because baby boomers were getting older and there are more jails locking up more criminals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Eh, if you take out the wannabe gangster black-on-black gun crimes, it is such a small insignificant problem. There is a group of people that have access to firearms that make those statistics seem much worse than they actually are. Just calling a spade a spade.

There are simple ways to exclude groups from statistical analyses. Even without the pesky spades, increased availability of guns correlates to increased gun violence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.theamericanmirror.com/video-trump-supporters-beaten-agitators-berkeley-rally/

 

Now imagine it's a black or muslim getting beat down and the outrage that would follow.

 

Anti-FA got their asses whooped yesterday. People have woken up and realized they are not allowed to assemble peacefully. The police are told to stand down by their lezbo chief, so they are left to fend for themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PC Twitter erupted in rage yesterday after the United States dropped the biggest non-nuclear bomb in its arsenal on an Islamic State-affiliated tunnel system in Eastern Afghanistan. Their complaint: The weapon’s nickname, “the mother of all bombs,” is sexist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PC Twitter erupted in rage yesterday after the United States dropped the biggest non-nuclear bomb in its arsenal on an Islamic State-affiliated tunnel system in Eastern Afghanistan. Their complaint: The weapon’s nickname, “the mother of all bombs,” is sexist.

Fake news. Not a single person was outraged about that. hth

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PC Twitter erupted in rage yesterday after the United States dropped the biggest non-nuclear bomb in its arsenal on an Islamic State-affiliated tunnel system in Eastern Afghanistan. Their complaint: The weapon’s nickname, “the mother of all bombs,” is sexist.

 

That encompasses liberal behavior to the tee. Focking pu$$y's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

That encompasses liberal behavior to the tee. Focking ######'s.

That encompasses retard behavior. Show me someone seriously bothered by the weapon's nickname, and I'll show you someone that 99% of liberals would make fun of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PC Twitter erupted in rage yesterday after the United States dropped the biggest non-nuclear bomb in its arsenal on an Islamic State-affiliated tunnel system in Eastern Afghanistan. Their complaint: The weapons nickname, the mother of all bombs, is sexist.

Liberals look for reasons to be offended.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That encompasses retard behavior. Show me someone seriously bothered by the weapon's nickname, and I'll show you someone that 99% of liberals would make fun of.

 

So wait, there is a very small percentage of you that give the rest of you a bad name, yet only the bad ones are brought up? Go figure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So wait, there is a very small percentage of you that give the rest of you a bad name, yet only the bad ones are brought up? Go figure.

Are you surrendering in your attempt to show me someone who is seriously offended by the weapon's nickname?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you surrendering in your attempt to show me someone who is seriously offended by the weapon's nickname?

 

Maybe not liberals from you're generation, but on my social media feed it is pretty common for people to be upset about this. Pretty sad what the left has done to the younger generation. Glad I didn't get sucked in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the wake of their stunning defeat the Lefties are stuck defending radical Islam, illegals, Chinese steel, Chicago murderers, Hollywood snowflakes, the unaffordable care act, transgender bathrooms, Chemical Warfare and Politically Correct Nonsense.

 

 

Eric Sasson, while ripping Trump, suggests that the liberal side might want to dial it down:

It is painfully clear that all our outrage didnt work. And now theres a danger of getting sucked into a vortex of what Id like to refer to as outrage porn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.theamericanmirror.com/video-trump-supporters-beaten-agitators-berkeley-rally/

 

Now imagine it's a black or muslim getting beat down and the outrage that would follow.

Not sure you really want to go there as far as the violence there.

Trump supporters sucker punching a guy...another known violent ass conservative punching a woman.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a Trump rally. Why were the anti-Trump people there? Why don't they have their own rally?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the wake of their stunning defeat the Lefties are stuck defending radical Islam, illegals, Chinese steel, Chicago murderers, Hollywood snowflakes, the unaffordable care act, transgender bathrooms, Chemical Warfare and Politically Correct Nonsense.

 

 

Eric Sasson, while ripping Trump, suggests that the liberal side might want to dial it down:

It is painfully clear that all our outrage didnt work. And now theres a danger of getting sucked into a vortex of what Id like to refer to as outrage porn.

I seem to recall you righties shooting gobs of jizz all over each other every time there was a terror attack during Obama's time in office. Not to mention how overjoyed you all were if gas prices went up or there was something negative in an economic report. So slow your roll Pappy. We have good memories. You clowns set the stage for how Presidents get respected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure you really want to go there as far as the violence there.

Trump supporters sucker punching a guy...another known violent ass conservative punching a woman.

 

Video? Were those ACTUAL Trump supporters or more of Soros' paid goons hired to stir up sh!t? He's had plenty of bankroll since election day causing trouble.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I seem to recall you righties shooting gobs of jizz all over each other every time there was a terror attack during Obama's time in office. Not to mention how overjoyed you all were if gas prices went up or there was something negative in an economic report. So slow your roll Pappy. We have good memories. You clowns set the stage for how Presidents get respected.

Wow, Mr Broad Bush is using his Broad Brush again.

 

#orangehypocrite

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, Mr Broad Bush is using his Broad Brush again.

 

#orangehypocrite

And Mr Denturegrip just posted something that said lefties defend radical Muslims. Doesn't get much broader than that, Gramps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×