Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Baker Boy

Bigotry and Hypocrisy

Recommended Posts

The Left thinks bigotry is acceptable in the USA and they practice it daily, yet their message is of tolerance which makes them hypocrites.

big·ot

NOUN

a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.

 

hy·poc·ri·sy

NOUN

the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense.

 

They are a bunch of hate fill people who demand of others what they dont practice themselves.

 

Where do you think this will go and what will the outcome be on society?

 

I honestly dont see how anyone can be a part of this movement unless they are brainwashed. I can see why they hate the Constitution.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cry-ba-by

NOUN

 

a person, especially a child, who sheds tears frequently or readily.

 

Example:

 

The Left thinks bigotry is acceptable in the USA and they practice it daily, yet their message is of tolerance which makes them hypocrites.

big·ot

NOUN

a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.

 

hy·poc·ri·sy

NOUN

the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense.

 

They are a bunch of hate fill people who demand of others what they dont practice themselves.

 

Where do you think this will go and what will the outcome be on society?

 

I honestly dont see how anyone can be a part of this movement unless they are brainwashed. I can see why they hate the Constitution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like I said they think it is OK, at least a few Bigots stepped forward right away.

 

The word McCarthyism comes to mind, when did this thinking become acceptable?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WATCH: Texas Teen Attacked in Restaurant for Wearing 'MAGA' Hat

http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/07/05/watch-texas-teen-attacked-restaurant-wearing-maga-hat

 

Campus fascists take over': University cancels conservative speaker

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/02/campus-fascists-take-over-university-cancels-conservative-speaker/#D7gBEBymrVULV1wW.99

 

DePaul cancels conservative’s speech

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/289999-depaul-cancels-conservatives-speech

 

 

Tim Allen Show ‘Last Man Standing’ Cancelled for Political Reasons?

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tim-allen-cancelled-political-views/

 

Ann Coulter speech at UC Berkeley canceled, again, amid fears for safety

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2017/04/26/ann-coulter-speech-canceled-at-uc-berkeley-amid-fears-for-safety/?utm_term=.550ca4e79194

 

Student group cancels discussion on free speech because of generalized ‘safety’ concerns

https://www.thecollegefix.com/post/43447/

 

James Woods is dropped by 'liberal' talent agent: 'It's the 4th of July and I'm feeling patriotic'

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/07/05/james-woods-is-dropped-by-liberal-talent-agent-its-4th-july-and-im-feeling-patriotic.html

 

Etc., Etc., Etc.

 

Hope and Change

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not that I have the authority to speak on behalf of "THE LEFT", but here are my thoughts:

 

Those that promote racism, sexism or other 'bad' values should not be allowed an open platform with no pushback, as they threaten to normalize their rhetoric. It should be made clear that those stances are not acceptable anywhere, but especially in a country that prides itself as a melting pot/liberty for all/all men are created equal place.

 

Even I agree that it can go to far though, and there is no official authority on who or what should get the Nazi treatment.

 

Nazis should get the Nazi treatment and fock whomever says otherwise.

 

Some 'conservative' speakers are just Nazis in disguise looking to recruit and embolden their base. Others are getting dragged along as collateral damage, but only because their platforms have been hijacked by the douchebags with no internal housecleaning.

 

I don't think THE LEFT ever had a platform of tolerance for all opinions. They promote tolerance of individuality, and that the rights of American should extend to everyone regardless of race, sexuality, gender or economic status.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not that I have the authority to speak on behalf of "THE LEFT", but here are my thoughts:

Those that promote racism, sexism or other 'bad' values should not be allowed an open platform with no pushback, as they threaten to normalize their rhetoric. It should be made clear that those stances are not acceptable anywhere, but especially in a country that prides itself as a melting pot/liberty for all/all men are created equal place.

Even I agree that it can go to far though, and there is no official authority on who or what should get the Nazi treatment.

Nazis should get the Nazi treatment and fock whomever says otherwise.

Some 'conservative' speakers are just Nazis in disguise looking to recruit and embolden their base. Others are getting dragged along as collateral damage, but only because their platforms have been hijacked by the douchebags with no internal housecleaning.

I don't think THE LEFT ever had a platform of tolerance for all opinions. They promote tolerance of individuality, and that the rights of American should extend to everyone regardless of race, sexuality, gender or economic status.

What do you mean by Nazi?

 

The roots of Nazi are Nationalsozialismus (National Socialism, later shortened to Nazi)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My own personal definition of Nazi is someone that promotes their race as superior while driving to eliminate other races, or their rights.

 

And no, I don't care whether Hitler had political views that align to the current left. He killed Jews and gays. That's the part I'm really focused on here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My own personal definition of Nazi is someone that promotes their race as superior while driving to eliminate other races, or their rights.

 

 

so you mean someone/something planned parenthood?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not that I have the authority to speak on behalf of "THE LEFT", but here are my thoughts:

 

Those that promote racism, sexism or other 'bad' values should not be allowed an open platform with no pushback, as they threaten to normalize their rhetoric. It should be made clear that those stances are not acceptable anywhere, but especially in a country that prides itself as a melting pot/liberty for all/all men are created equal place.

 

Even I agree that it can go to far though, and there is no official authority on who or what should get the Nazi treatment.

 

Nazis should get the Nazi treatment and fock whomever says otherwise.

 

Some 'conservative' speakers are just Nazis in disguise looking to recruit and embolden their base. Others are getting dragged along as collateral damage, but only because their platforms have been hijacked by the douchebags with no internal housecleaning.

 

I don't think THE LEFT ever had a platform of tolerance for all opinions. They promote tolerance of individuality, and that the rights of American should extend to everyone regardless of race, sexuality, gender or economic status.

 

Seems to always be a lot of focus on "Nazi" behavior, but does anyone ever call in question the Marxist/Communist behavior of the left? Why just ban Nazi behavior? I would say that Marxist/Communist behavior is as bad or even worse. Remember, Socialism has a body count of about 100+ million people in the 20th century alone between Stalin, Mao, North Korea and the Khmer Rouge. There is also a reasonable debate as to whether Hitler was a product of the left as well (The Nationalist Socialist Party). So while Nazi's are certainly bad, the real reigning in needs to happen on groups aligning with the left.

 

Also, who gets to decide what are "bad values" and what aren't?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Left thinks bigotry is acceptable in the USA and they practice it daily, yet their message is of tolerance which makes them hypocrites.

big·ot

NOUN

a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.

 

hy·poc·ri·sy

NOUN

the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense.

 

They are a bunch of hate fill people who demand of others what they dont practice themselves.

 

Where do you think this will go and what will the outcome be on society?

 

I honestly dont see how anyone can be a part of this movement unless they are brainwashed. I can see why they hate the Constitution.

 

Whats "funny" about this is the posters here who can't even respond to you without a childish retort and evading the point. Your point is so spot on they can't do anything but deflect. Just a pathetic bunch. :thumbsdown:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WATCH: Texas Teen Attacked in Restaurant for Wearing 'MAGA' Hat

http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/07/05/watch-texas-teen-attacked-restaurant-wearing-maga-hat

 

Campus fascists take over': University cancels conservative speaker

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/02/campus-fascists-take-over-university-cancels-conservative-speaker/#D7gBEBymrVULV1wW.99

 

DePaul cancels conservative’s speech

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/289999-depaul-cancels-conservatives-speech

 

 

Tim Allen Show ‘Last Man Standing’ Cancelled for Political Reasons?

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tim-allen-cancelled-political-views/

 

Ann Coulter speech at UC Berkeley canceled, again, amid fears for safety

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2017/04/26/ann-coulter-speech-canceled-at-uc-berkeley-amid-fears-for-safety/?utm_term=.550ca4e79194

 

Student group cancels discussion on free speech because of generalized ‘safety’ concerns

https://www.thecollegefix.com/post/43447/

 

James Woods is dropped by 'liberal' talent agent: 'It's the 4th of July and I'm feeling patriotic'

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/07/05/james-woods-is-dropped-by-liberal-talent-agent-its-4th-july-and-im-feeling-patriotic.html

 

Etc., Etc., Etc.

 

Hope and Change

 

:thumbsup:

 

The left knows no logic and has sick sour shix running through it's veins. They are simply attention whores who's audience is walking away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My own personal definition of Nazi is someone that promotes their race as superior while driving to eliminate other races, or their rights.

 

And no, I don't care whether Hitler had political views that align to the current left. He killed Jews and gays. That's the part I'm really focused on here.

 

so the left

 

they support Iran and other radical Islamic militant nations in killing gays and Jews

 

meanwhile even our Nazis in this nation, I haven't heard of any gay or jew killing promotions

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand this thinking that "The left's views are based on hate." but somehow the right is immune to this criticism.

 

The left's view are pretty much "we hate homophobes, misogynists, and racists."

 

The rights are "We hate gays, women and dark skin colors."

 

Who's correct here? If someone from the planet Altruistic Morality landed on Earth, do you honestly think they would align themselves with the right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My own personal definition of Nazi is someone that promotes their race as superior while driving to eliminate other races, or their rights.

That's not a Nazi, that's a racist. I realize that words like racist and Nazi have lost the stigma that used to be associated with them because too many idiots have used the words frivolously but what you have described above is a racist not a Nazi.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand this thinking that "The left's views are based on hate." but somehow the right is immune to this criticism.

 

The left's view are pretty much "we hate homophobes, misogynists, and racists." but we love ISLAM and IRAN

 

The rights are "We hate gays, women and dark skin colors."

 

Who's correct here? If someone from the planet Altruistic Morality landed on Earth, do you honestly think they would align themselves with the right?

 

where have you EVER seen we hate women, gays, dark skin?

 

MSNBC? Huffpo? Slate? VOX?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand this thinking that "The left's views are based on hate." but somehow the right is immune to this criticism.

 

The left's view are pretty much "we hate homophobes, misogynists, and racists."

 

The rights are "We hate gays, women and dark skin colors."

 

Who's correct here? If someone from the planet Altruistic Morality landed on Earth, do you honestly think they would align themselves with the right?

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep them coming this is good stuff but it is scary how easily people will defend Bigotry.

 

 

Baker Boy, you forgot another definition that fits the left.

 

ob·tuse
əbˈt(y)o͞os,äbˈt(y)o͞os/
adjective
  1. 1.
    annoyingly insensitive or slow to understand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

so the left

 

they support Iran and other radical Islamic militant nations in killing gays and Jews

 

meanwhile even our Nazis in this nation, I haven't heard of any gay or jew killing promotions

How exactly is the left supporting Iran and Islamic militants in killing gays and Jews.

 

I mean, apart from the popular Democratic "Bullets for ISIS" GoFundMe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How exactly is the left supporting Iran and Islamic militants in killing gays and Jews.

 

I mean, apart from the popular Democratic "Bullets for ISIS" GoFundMe.

 

the democrats support Muslim and the Palestine (controlled by Hamas a terrorist group) vs the Jews

 

the democrats also supported giving money to terrorist Iran for some hostages, and to build bombs, and were outraged when Trump said nope no more

 

maybe you can follow along after that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's not a Nazi, that's a racist. I realize that words like racist and Nazi have lost the stigma that used to be associated with them because too many idiots have used the words frivolously but what you have described above is a racist not a Nazi.

Racist means you hold a negative opinion on someone because of their race.

 

Nazi's also wanted to wipe Jews off the face of the planet by murdering them.

 

Basically in the hierarchy of racism, you have:

 

vanilla racists -> KKK members -> Nazis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not that I have the authority to speak on behalf of "THE LEFT", but here are my thoughts:

 

Those that promote racism, sexism or other 'bad' values should not be allowed an open platform with no pushback, as they threaten to normalize their rhetoric. It should be made clear that those stances are not acceptable anywhere, but especially in a country that prides itself as a melting pot/liberty for all/all men are created equal place.

 

Even I agree that it can go to far though, and there is no official authority on who or what should get the Nazi treatment.

 

Nazis should get the Nazi treatment and fock whomever says otherwise.

 

Some 'conservative' speakers are just Nazis in disguise looking to recruit and embolden their base. Others are getting dragged along as collateral damage, but only because their platforms have been hijacked by the douchebags with no internal housecleaning.

 

I don't think THE LEFT ever had a platform of tolerance for all opinions. They promote tolerance of individuality, and that the rights of American should extend to everyone regardless of race, sexuality, gender or economic status.

 

Who get's to determine this? What are the thresholds? If you didn't vote for Obama does that make you "racist"? If you voted for Trump does that make you "sexist"? If you are for tougher immigration laws does that make you a "Nazi"? Who gets to define who is and who isn't all these things?

 

The reason I ask is because those terms are thrown around so much at so little of things that they're watered down. The whole Boy who Cried Wolf thingy.

 

A lot of what's protested against isn't freakin' KKK marches. It's a comedian or speaker at a campus. It's a freaking fast food restaurant who's closed on Sundays. It's a press secretary doing her job. None of that hardly passes the smell test of what you're alluding too.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Racist means you hold a negative opinion on someone because of their race.

 

 

A negative opinion, like just one. Well shiit.....I'd wager 99% of the world is racist then. Gah, I hold negative opinions of white rednecks who live in my town. I guess I'm racist against my own race.

 

If everyone is "racist" is anyone really racist?

 

Thought for the day. :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Who get's to determine this? What are the thresholds? If you didn't vote for Obama does that make you "racist"? If you voted for Trump does that make you "sexist"? If you are for tougher immigration laws does that make you a "Nazi"? Who gets to define who is and who isn't all these things?

 

The reason I ask is because those terms are thrown around so much at so little of things that they're watered down. The whole Boy who Cried Wolf thingy.

 

A lot of what's protested against isn't freakin' KKK marches. It's a comedian or speaker at a campus. It's a freaking fast food restaurant who's closed on Sundays. It's a press secretary doing her job. None of that hardly passes the smell test of what you're alluding too.

 

exactly, and who determines what is a "bad" value

 

is thinking a man is a man and a woman is a woman a bad value?

 

is thinking killing a baby is a bad value?

 

is thinking not having open borders and defending our country a bad value?

 

what are some of your values Electric Mayhem? cause after you take away our bad values they will come after yours, the progressive left never stops, they just push further and further

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A negative opinion, like just one. Well shiit.....I'd wager 99% of the world is racist then. Gah, I hold negative opinions of white rednecks who live in my town. I guess I'm racist against my own race.

 

If everyone is "racist" is anyone really racist?

 

Thought for the day. :P

What do you call the person who races the most?

 

A racest

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

where have you EVER seen we hate women, gays, dark skin?

 

MSNBC? Huffpo? Slate? VOX?

Build the Wall

ALL lives matter

If they just followed police orders they would be alive today

If they just didn't break the law they would be alive today

Why do we need affirmative action?

Gerrymandering is fair

We are going to obstruct everything Obama does to delegitimize his Presidency

Gays should not be able to marry

Trans women only want to use Women's rooms to rape women

Voter ID laws

Gay conversion therapy promotion

Anger at the removal of Confederate monuments

Promotion of the Confederate flag

"On both sides... on both sides"

They're taking our jobs

Also they only want stuff for free

Refugees are M-13 rapists

Women should not be in the military

Women should not be in active duty

Gays should not be in the military

...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

the democrats support Muslim and the Palestine (controlled by Hamas a terrorist group) vs the Jews

 

the democrats also supported giving money to terrorist Iran for some hostages, and to build bombs, and were outraged when Trump said nope no more

 

maybe you can follow along after that

I've never heard of the first thing you mentioned - shoot me a link.

 

As for the negotiation of hostages? That rings more like a "pro releasing of hostages" than "pro militants".

 

If they were pro-militant they would have just given them the money with nothing in exchange, right?

 

Also, if you're in the mood to be pissed at a party for arming Iran and militants, while not giving a rat's ass about hostages in the process, might I remind you of this little nugget:

 

"The IranContra affair, also referred to as Irangate, Contragate or the IranContra scandal, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration. Senior administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was the subject of an arms embargo. They hoped, thereby, to fund the Contras in Nicaragua while at the same time negotiating the release of several U.S. hostages. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress."

 

LOLS

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Build the Wall - not racist

ALL lives matter -not racist

If they just followed police orders they would be alive today - true

If they just didn't break the law they would be alive today - true

Why do we need affirmative action? -absolutely

Gerrymandering is fair - its fair if both sides do it

We are going to obstruct everything Obama does to delegitimize his Presidency - sounds like business as normal

Gays should not be able to marry - Obama quote

Trans women only want to use Women's rooms to rape women - said nobody ever

Voter ID laws - how is that racist? you need an ID to drive, to cash a govt check, to cash any check, to rent a place to live

Gay conversion therapy promotion - oh cause thinking therapy for confused kids is gay conversion therapy

Anger at the removal of Confederate monuments - why does history need to be removed? fail to learn from history and you are doomed to repeat it ( I am sure you are fine with that Little House on the Prairie writer being called a racist too)

Promotion of the Confederate flag - nobody promotes the flag, but it does serve as a historical representation of a once divided country (I am sure you are good with illegals flying whatever shithole flag they want)

"On both sides... on both sides" - true

They're taking our jobs - true

Also they only want stuff for free - true

Refugees are M-13 rapists - some are

Women should not be in the military - to an extent I agree women bring chaos to large groups of men...I know I know, nature and all that men are pigs whatever

Women should not be in active duty - see above they can do other stuff just not front line, its a man's natural instinct to protect women and children

Gays should not be in the military - Clinton

...

 

next

again not a single thing you listed was homophobic, racist, or sexist

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never heard of the first thing you mentioned - shoot me a link.

 

As for the negotiation of hostages? That rings more like a "pro releasing of hostages" than "pro militants".

 

If they were pro-militant they would have just given them the money with nothing in exchange, right?

 

Also, if you're in the mood to be pissed at a party for arming Iran and militants, while not giving a rat's ass about hostages in the process, might I remind you of this little nugget:

 

"The IranContra affair, also referred to as Irangate, Contragate or the IranContra scandal, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration. Senior administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was the subject of an arms embargo. They hoped, thereby, to fund the Contras in Nicaragua while at the same time negotiating the release of several U.S. hostages. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress."

 

LOLS

 

I can tell you right now since I was about 12 years old I dont give a rats ass about that stuff during the Iran Contra stuff, but I think its bad

 

sorry I don't feel bad for any hostages who go into those shitholes, and get caught, they know what they are facing, it is and always should be US policy to not pay for the release of hostages

 

Palestine support

https://www.timesofisrael.com/poll-democratic-support-for-israel-palestinians-nearly-identical/

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/15/politics/democrats-views-on-israel-shifting/index.html

under Obama

https://www.republicanviews.org/democratic-views-on-israel/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Who get's to determine this? What are the thresholds? If you didn't vote for Obama does that make you "racist"? If you voted for Trump does that make you "sexist"? If you are for tougher immigration laws does that make you a "Nazi"? Who gets to define who is and who isn't all these things?

 

The reason I ask is because those terms are thrown around so much at so little of things that they're watered down. The whole Boy who Cried Wolf thingy.

 

A lot of what's protested against isn't freakin' KKK marches. It's a comedian or speaker at a campus. It's a freaking fast food restaurant who's closed on Sundays. It's a press secretary doing her job. None of that hardly passes the smell test of what you're alluding too.

My response above included this sentence:

 

"Even I agree that it can go to far though, and there is no official authority on who or what should get the Nazi treatment."

 

There is a lot of grey area. Everyone probably draws their own lines of what is considered "TOO FAR!!!!!"

 

I don't think anyone is calling Sanders a Nazi, they are just sick of her bold faces lies and arrogance in telling them.

 

I'd be happy to share my own personal values if you actually care. They lean left, but not always. I try to use sympathy when I can, and empathy when I can't to define my morality.

 

I'm sure some of my stances are silly, but they at least strive to be altruistic, even though they may miss.

 

I don't think THE RIGHT's stances can say the same, nor do I think they have any desire to do so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My response above included this sentence:

 

"Even I agree that it can go to far though, and there is no official authority on who or what should get the Nazi treatment."

 

There is a lot of grey area. Everyone probably draws their own lines of what is considered "TOO FAR!!!!!"

 

I don't think anyone is calling Sanders a Nazi, they are just sick of her bold faces lies and arrogance in telling them.

 

I'd be happy to share my own personal values if you actually care. They lean left, but not always. I try to use sympathy when I can, and empathy when I can't to define my morality.

 

I'm sure some of my stances are silly, but they at least strive to be altruistic, even though they may miss.

 

I don't think THE RIGHT's stances can say the same, nor do I think they have any desire to do so.

 

EM you put your stances, I will put mine, then we can come to a middle ground

 

as far as too far, the 1st amendment means nothing is too far, and I believe that wholeheartedly

 

call me a white trash cracker, I dont care, call someone a nagger whatever, incite violence is where the 1st amend ends, and thats what is being done by Maxine and her ilk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×