Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
RaiderHaters Revenge

Ben Shapiro offers Socialist Chick 10k to debate him....she goes apepoop

Recommended Posts

So basically you’re admitting you don’t know what you’re talking about.

 

Yep I'm at a loss here. Not angry or fringe, Choose to spend most my life outside the house, in the presence of other humans, interacting in real time. Not angerly typing away on a keyboard with complete strangers. Even before the internet was never big into the news on TV either. Always felt it was just a cancer aimed at the angry. Internet is more of the same, only on steroids.

 

To each his own I guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I didn't say he was. Hell I don't even know who he is. I merely pointed out that she stooped to his level, name calling on social media. Also I did not know he has invited her to debate prior to this, in a non public way. Which I don't know if that could even be verified other than he said she said? And even then, he is grand standing after the fact. Which is just more of the same trashy behavior that gets angry/fringe people to click on the link I suppose.

 

Shapiro talks to/interviews 100's of people a week, he never goes on social media to invite people, only those who challenge things like she did

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Yep I'm at a loss here. Not angry or fringe, Choose to spend most my life outside the house, in the presence of other humans, interacting in real time. Not angerly typing away on a keyboard with complete strangers. Even before the internet was never big into the news on TV either. Always felt it was just a cancer aimed at the angry. Internet is more of the same, only on steroids.

 

To each his own I guess.

 

fwiw, I have listened to talk radio for 30 years, podcasts have replaced that, and I drive 2-3 hours a day, its the only time I watch/listen to them

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t know who she is, but these are the top 4 results I got for the same search:

https://m.facebook.com/democrats

https://www.thenation.com/article/new-face-democratic-party/

http://www.startribune.com/new-dnc-chair-perez-wants-to-make-ellison-the-face-of-the-democratic-party/414821354/

https://ntknetwork.com/who-is-the-face-of-the-democratic-party-the-answer-might-surprise-you/

It’s funny how search engines feed you what you want to see. For the record, my results are on DuckDuckGo using Safari.

 

I just use google since its most universal, its funny that your 2nd one is from 2001

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just use google since its most universal, its funny that your 2nd one is from 2001

Yeah, I thought that was odd as well. I try not to use google given their penchant for tracking data.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Shapiro talks to/interviews 100's of people a week, he never goes on social media to invite people, only those who challenge things like she did

 

But that is what he just did here isn't it? He made a spectacle of inviting her to debate on social media. Are you saying he only does this if someone declines his invitation?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You all overrate Shapiro quite a bit. I haven't followed anything particular about Ocasio, so not sure on how should fare on a debate with him. But yes, no way in hell should she go on his show to debate him. The prospect of gaining anything is so effing slim it would be pointless.

 

This guy gets it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

But that is what he just did here isn't it? He made a spectacle of inviting her to debate on social media. Are you saying he only does this if someone declines his invitation?

 

what I am saying is that he will call you out if you decline to come on his show, while claiming nobody on the right wants to even talk to me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

what I am saying is that he will call you out if you decline to come on his show, while claiming nobody on the right wants to even talk to me

 

Ahhhh I see. Why doesn't he go on national TV? I bet he wouldn't get turned down for requests then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is she going to debate? That we need to spend 60 trillion over a decade because of a tax cut bill?

 

Its not a serious discussion which is why it they arent debating anything. Just the generic identity politics pivots

 

Raise taxes, government control over health care and other industry, turn college into high school part II, EVERYTHING FREE FREE FREE!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Ahhhh I see. Why doesn't he go on national TV? I bet he wouldn't get turned down for requests then.

 

he has more viewers than CNN or MSNBC on his own platform, plus he owns his own platform and therefore isnt bound to corporate opinion. But he is regularly a guest on CNN, FOX and even MSNBC. He prefers long form interviews though, cause the soundbyte news shows, are all about getting in quick jabs to prove your point

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

cause the soundbyte news shows, are all about getting in quick jabs to prove your point

 

This I agree with 110%. But people sometimes act like this is a new thing. The news has always been like this. At least in my lifetime. Pure garbage, all of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont blame her for thinking Shapiro made this offer in bad faith but it was really, really dumb to liken it to catcalling. Shes not the face of the Democratic Party but she is becoming the face of the Democratic Socialist wing of the party. Also people talk about her like shes smoking? I think shes an attractive woman but nothing special. I guess for a politician shes unusually hot.

Whom do you place he blame with thinking Shapiro had bad intentions. Bwahahaha. Bad intentions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I watched to Maher one. Remember it as Maher winning on some level. Maybe that's me..I'll watch again.

 

As a R I agree.

 

Now, agree with me. This chick would get destroyed and rightfully so. Right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whom do you place he blame with thinking Shapiro had bad intentions. Bwahahaha. Bad intentions.

English motherfocker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

English motherfocker.

Maybe should punch him in the face tough guy!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kimmel is a punk. I'd hand him his ass if ever ran into him.

:clap:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:clap:

Come on! We're trying to have a reasonable discussion!

 

When Cenk MDC uses the F word, you know it's real talk!

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You should hand this Cenk guy his ass. :bandana:

Come on! We're trying to have a reasonable discussion!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thatll just push the capitalist democrats further to the right.

They may not vote for Trump, but hopefully enough of them will go third party.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People think they're going to be better off with socialism. And by better off I mean they think they'll get a bunch of free stuff. What they don't realize is everyone will be taxed so heavily that you won't have any money to do anything, so yeah, you'll get free healthcare and free college or whatever thing you want to be free, but say goodbye to your nice car and the nice clothes and the flat screen TV and the new computer and phone every two years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People think they're going to be better off with socialism. And by better off I mean they think they'll get a bunch of free stuff. What they don't realize is everyone will be taxed so heavily that you won't have any money to do anything, so yeah, you'll get free healthcare and free college or whatever thing you want to be free, but say goodbye to your nice car and the nice clothes and the flat screen TV and the new computer and phone every two years.

 

but, but we can make those free too.!!!

 

and Finwaymarkerland

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People think they're going to be better off with socialism. And by better off I mean they think they'll get a bunch of free stuff. What they don't realize is everyone will be taxed so heavily that you won't have any money to do anything, so yeah, you'll get free healthcare and free college or whatever thing you want to be free, but say goodbye to your nice car and the nice clothes and the flat screen TV and the new computer and phone every two years.

The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.

I really dig this quote.... and looked up the rest. Dig it even more:

 

You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.

 

Adrian Rogers

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really dig this quote.... and looked up the rest. Dig it even more:

 

You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.

 

Adrian Rogers

 

If you don't agree with that quote your logic is broken.

 

If you are poor it is your own fault.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really dig this quote.... and looked up the rest. Dig it even more:

 

You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.

 

Adrian Rogers

that dude nailed it. 👍

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You all overrate Shapiro quite a bit. I haven't followed anything particular about Ocasio, so not sure on how should fare on a debate with him. But yes, no way in hell should she go on his show to debate him. The prospect of gaining anything is so effing slim it would be pointless. If she won the debate in some manner, her base would celebrate and every knob in this thread would claim she lost and somehow went apepoop.

I don't think anyone disagrees with you. However, she is comparing exposing the viewpoints she will carry into public office to a sexual assault.

 

She has proposed 3.2 trillion + in new yearly spending, paying for it by raising 181billion in taxes...

 

...

 

 

...

 

 

...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really dig this quote.... and looked up the rest. Dig it even more:

 

You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.

 

Adrian Rogers

Its a little too simplistic, and ignores the societal cost of poverty....

 

If your local city is over run by homelessness, and you have to step over a dozen people sleeping on the sidewalk to go downtown, you aren't going to enjoy the city the same. Maybe you don't go there anymore, city continues to wither away and die. Then it takes down the surrounding suburbs, and continues metasticizing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×