Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
vuduchile

Kavanaugh sexual misconduct in High School

Recommended Posts

 

Sure did. Hancho thinks that's totally normal.

 

Cdubb thinks things he reads on 4chan/twitter should be taken as facts... :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not read a single article on kavanaugh. Nor have I watched any news on him.

 

I do not have enough information to form an opinion.

 

 

Carry on.

By chance, did your fishing boat get blown out to Gilligan's Island by Hurricane Florence?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I don't think she has stated she was drunk, but had only one beer. :dunno:

 

A writer at Slate posits a theory that's worth a read...I would suggest 90% of the people in this thread skip it though.

 

 

The problem with this "theory" is it assumes all these encounters actually happened. I can't believe anyone would take Ramirez's account seriously. This chick admits her memory is foggy and she only remembered the incident after 6 days of conferring with her attorneys. Anyone who would believe it's even slightly likely to be true clearly has an agenda.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have literally had enough of this . Now some other broads coming out? Why do they all crawl out of the woodwork at the last minute? Do the benefit of Judge for a long freaking time. Gee, I'm sure the television has nothing to do with it. Which one of them lands a contract with Dancing with the Stars first?

 

Wake me when it's over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I don't think she has stated she was drunk, but had only one beer. :dunno:

 

A writer at Slate posits a theory that's worth a read...I would suggest 90% of the people in this thread skip it though.

 

 

Do a little research on The Slate Group and get back with us bud.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have literally had enough of this ######. Now some other broads coming out? Why do they all crawl out of the woodwork at the last minute? Do the benefit of Judge for a long freaking time. Gee, I'm sure the television has nothing to do with it. Which one of them lands a contract with Dancing with the Stars first?

 

Wake me when it's over.

This is where Im at. Wake me up next week.

 

Scrubbed social media

Porn star attorneys

Gang Bangs

 

All at the last minute. :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

I keep saying this but... this story just doesn't fly. One, why was she drunk in a room with two guys? Two, she wasn't escaping if they wanted to rape her.

 

The likely scenario is she went in with them to mess around, something went amiss, she decided to bail, they let her go. :dunno:

More likely Kavanaugh decided he didn't want a turn with the school slut and THAT is what pissed her off.

 

I still contend it's all made up bullshit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She sucked 37 d!cks?!!?

Back then in HS/college it was much easier to get laid than a BJ. Believe me I was there. Bill Clinton really unlocked the BJ to be meanstream hip . Ill never speak bad about him for that. At least in my area of MA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She sucked 37 d!cks?!!?

 

 

Not all at once.... :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They should over turn Roe v Wade and uphold National Voter ID on day 1 after Kav is seated, just to rustle the jimmies of these domestic terrorists.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kavanaugh calls newest claim absolutely ridiculous and says this is from the "Twilight Zone"

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/26/jockeying-over-evidence-kavanaugh-hearing-842711

 

I agree. The Democrats and left are absolutely despicable.

 

At this point, I might even support a purge of liberals and send them to one of their Socialist Utopia's like Venezuela or Cuba. They can have 'em. Maybe a little dose of reality will knock some sense into them.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kavanaugh calls newest claim absolutely ridiculous and says this is from the "Twilight Zone"

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/26/jockeying-over-evidence-kavanaugh-hearing-842711

 

I agree. The Democrats and left are absolutely despicable.

 

At this point, I might even support a purge of liberals and send them to one of their Socialist Utopia's like Venezuela or Cuba. They can have 'em. Maybe a little does of reality will knock some sense into them.

Its the dems version of pizzagate

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kavanaugh calls newest claim absolutely ridiculous and says this is from the "Twilight Zone"

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/26/jockeying-over-evidence-kavanaugh-hearing-842711

 

I agree. The Democrats and left are absolutely despicable.

 

At this point, I might even support a purge of liberals and send them to one of their Socialist Utopia's like Venezuela or Cuba. They can have 'em. Maybe a little does of reality will knock some sense into them.

lowest of the low

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Back then in HS/college it was much easier to get laid than a BJ. Believe me I was there. Bill Clinton really unlocked the BJ to be meanstream hip . Ill never speak bad about him for that. At least in my area of MA

Yep. The pendulum definitely swung the other way after I left HS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The problem with this "theory" is it assumes all these encounters actually happened. I can't believe anyone would take Ramirez's account seriously. This chick admits her memory is foggy and she only remembered the incident after 6 days of conferring with her attorneys. Anyone who would believe it's even slightly likely to be true clearly has an agenda.

 

At odds with that though are multiple classmates of Ramirez apparently were talking about this incident months ago. Obviously Heresay, but compelling when taken independently.

 

 

Rolling Stone

 

The fact that people were talking about the incident after it happened is one of the tentpoles of the claim’s credibility. The New Yorker cites multiple students who detail hearing about it second-hand, several of which were able to corroborate the account independently of Ramirez. “We found classmates had been talking about this for weeks,” Mayer said Monday on CBS. “There’d been an email chain of Yale classmates of Kavanaugh talking about ‘will this thing come out’ long before Christine Blasey Ford came forward. We felt the public ought to know about this.”

 

Ronan Farrow, the report’s co-author, took care of the second part of Kavanaugh’s defense, that those he knew at the time say “it’s inconceivable that I could have done such a thing.”

 

James Roche, a software industry CEO who was Kavanaugh’s roommate at the time, released a statement on Monday to supplement the New Yorker‘s reporting. In it, he wrote about how Kavanaugh was “a notably heavy drinker, even by the standards of the time, and that he became aggressive and belligerent when he was very drunk.” He went on to note that he became friends with Ramirez and trusts her account. “Based on my time with Debbie, I believe her to be unusually honest and straightforward and I cannot imagine her making this up,” he wrote, adding that he believed “[Kavanaugh] and his social circle were capable of the actions Debbie described.”

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

At odds with that though are multiple classmates of Ramirez apparently were talking about this incident months ago. Obviously Heresay, but compelling when taken independently.

 

 

You want to hang your hat on this:

 

The New Yorker cites multiple students who detail hearing about it second-hand, several of which were able to corroborate the account independently of Ramirez.

 

Wow.

 

How much credence do you give to the FACT that every person the first two accusers have specifically named as having been there don't even remember the incidents in question? That seems pretty damning IMO. If I say, "these people can attest to this" and they say "uh, I don't remember that ever happening", it should reflect on my credibility, don't you think?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The question I can't get out of my head is, if you honestly believed that this guy was such a sexual predator, why did you wait this long?

 

Oh sure, he's a man and a very powerful position with a lifetime job to boot, but I'm sure he's not a threat to anybody else! And then one day before the vote? Oh go yourself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You want to hang your hat on this:

 

 

Wow.

 

How much credence do you give to the FACT that every person the first two accusers have specifically named as having been there don't even remember the incidents in question? That seems pretty damning IMO. If I say, "these people can attest to this" and they say "uh, I don't remember that ever happening", it should reflect on my credibility, don't you think?

 

I haven't hung my hat anywhere. Just countering 'she was drunk and can't remember' with other people who were on campus at the time remember hearing that story. That's not exactly nothing.

 

I do give credence to that fact, but I also weigh it against self-preservation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The question I can't get out of my head is, if you honestly believed that this guy was such a sexual predator, why did you wait this long?

 

Oh sure, he's a man and a very powerful position with a lifetime job to boot, but I'm sure he's not a threat to anybody else! And then one day before the vote? Oh go ###### yourself.

 

Why did those Sandusky kids wait so long??? That's not an argument...heck Maryland doesn't even have a statute of limitations on sex crimes for the exact reason that many victims don't come forward right away.

 

ETA: The most recent allegations(Julie Swetnick) made in Maryland are could start a police investigation

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you see when they interviewed him recently and asked him about it? His response Well Obama won right didnt care if it was true or not; just that Obama won.

Doesn't surprise me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Why did those Sandusky kids wait so long??? That's not an argument...heck Maryland doesn't even have a statute of limitations on sex crimes for the exact reason that many victims don't come forward right away.

 

ETA: The most recent allegations(Julie Swetnick) made in Maryland are could start a police investigation

 

Except that she doesn't accuse Kavanaug of raping her at all.

 

What's next? kavanaugh's guilty because he was in the same City or State as the crime? Pa-f@cking-thetic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Multiple allegations from people asking the FBI to investigate. Those arent the actions of people lying.

Multiple people with a lot to lose of they testify and are lying. Yet all of you think they are liars.

And wish it all would end and just confirm without ever investigating at all.

So utterly ridiculous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Uh-Oh. Bot must be on full tilt. I see the posts (This post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore posts by Sho Nuff. View it anyway?) are coming fast and furious.

Why ignore him if youre going to constantly talk about him anyway? Clearly youre obsessed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Why did those Sandusky kids wait so long??? That's not an argument...heck Maryland doesn't even have a statute of limitations on sex crimes for the exact reason that many victims don't come forward right away.

 

ETA: The most recent allegations(Julie Swetnick) made in Maryland are could start a police investigation

The case is so similar too. Well except she's the only one who says it happened. Nobody she says who can collaborate her story has done as much. Also he didn't rape her. Also the kids did tell but the community silenced it. So yeah come to think about it your analogy is as full of sh1t as Ford is.

 

You are awarded zero points. Go back to FBG where the soybois believe this garbage

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The question I can't get out of my head is, if you honestly believed that this guy was such a sexual predator, why did you wait this long?

 

Oh sure, he's a man and a very powerful position with a lifetime job to boot, but I'm sure he's not a threat to anybody else! And then one day before the vote? Oh go ###### yourself.

 

 

 

Why did those Sandusky kids wait so long??? That's not an argument...heck Maryland doesn't even have a statute of limitations on sex crimes for the exact reason that many victims don't come forward right away.

 

ETA: The most recent allegations(Julie Swetnick) made in Maryland are could start a police investigation

 

You might want to look at the context of a statement before replying. I didn't compare the cases, I was merely pointing out that not all victims come forward right away.

 

The case is so similar too. Well except she's the only one who says it happened. Nobody she says who can collaborate her story has done as much. Also he didn't rape her. Also the kids did tell but the community silenced it. So yeah come to think about it your analogy is as full of sh1t as Ford is.

 

You are awarded zero points. Go back to FBG where the soybois believe this garbage

 

You all right man, no need for the hostility. :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The case is so similar too. Well except she's the only one who says it happened. Nobody she says who can collaborate her story has done as much. Also he didn't rape her. Also the kids did tell but the community silenced it. So yeah come to think about it your analogy is as full of sh1t as Ford is.

 

You are awarded zero points. Go back to FBG where the soybois believe this garbage

for the win

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They were invoking the Biden rule, and they could do it because Harry Reid changed the rules to benefit the democrats when they were the majority. We all know Obama quickly blew that. Democrats have themselves to blame about Garland. Plus Obama didn't really put up much of a fight, confident Hillary would win. Why wouldn't he? The FBI told him it was in the bag. Lol. You really need to start reading and watching some news programs.

There is no official “Biden rule”. But remind me how many appointees have been blocked by it? Have the Republicans ever changed the appointment rules to benefit their appointees?

 

All the partisan gamesmanship is nonsense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

×