Squintz82 45 Posted October 9, 2018 I'm commish of a 12 team PPR league. I will never veto a trade, and there are no reviews. We generally have a trustworthy group, and sometimes have lopsided trades. But today was one of the worst I've ever seen, and wanted to get other opinions to see if I'm overreacting. One owner just sent Lynch, Drake, and Chris Godwin for Deandre Hopkins. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LaChup 154 Posted October 9, 2018 Seems fair to me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tanatastic 2,061 Posted October 9, 2018 Perfectly fair deal. Hopkins is a bonafide wr1. Lynch is a semi decent RB2, Drake and Godwin are borderline flex. Plus factor in that the guy trading 3 buys the best player in the deal AND 2 free roster spots. If Im the Hopkins owner Id turn that down unless I was desperate for RB help which he prob is. Just curious, which side were you thinking gets the better end? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Air Mcnaair 0 Posted October 9, 2018 I'm commish of a 12 team PPR league. I will never veto a trade, and there are no reviews. We generally have a trustworthy group, and sometimes have lopsided trades. But today was one of the worst I've ever seen, and wanted to get other opinions to see if I'm overreacting. One owner just sent Lynch, Drake, and Chris Godwin for Deandre Hopkins. While I'd take the Nuk side 100 times out of a 100, I am curious: Is this a Dynasty league? Because Godwin has at least decent value down the road in that setting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
makindollaz 40 Posted October 9, 2018 I'm guessing the guy giving up Hopkins has been beat up with injuries or had a terrible draft, and is trying to balance out the roster. I wouldn't block it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brutal Brutus 182 Posted October 9, 2018 If the team getting three players is desperate I could see someone taking it. I wouldn't, but were getting to a point where some teams need to start making desperation moves. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tanatastic 2,061 Posted October 9, 2018 If it was Godwin and Drake, then you veto it. Even then it could still pan out, who knows. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil Simms 11 127 Posted October 9, 2018 Fair trade, I find it odd that you are questioning it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Squintz82 45 Posted October 9, 2018 Alright, thanks for your input. I'm probably overreacting, but it feels like 3 quarters for a dollar. And again, blocking or vetoing was never a question. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Squintz82 45 Posted October 9, 2018 While I'd take the Nuk side 100 times out of a 100, I am curious: Is this a Dynasty league? Because Godwin has at least decent value down the road in that setting. No, redraft. Owner giving up Hopkins has Hilton as his WR1 and lost Ajayi. He's panicking. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ehlana 25 Posted October 9, 2018 The 3 quarters for a dollar seems like a pretty good analogy, but it's the Hopkins manager's choice so who knows. Maybe there's a fourth quarter stuck to one of the three that are visible. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tanatastic 2,061 Posted October 9, 2018 Alright, thanks for your input. I'm probably overreacting, but it feels like 3 quarters for a dollar. And again, blocking or vetoing was never a question. Thats only a loss of 25c though. Hes getting some value in return and possibly more if Drake somehow turned the switch on. Sometimes you accept 75c for a buck if you think the 75c could possibly earn some interest down the road. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgcrawfish 232 Posted October 9, 2018 nothing wrong with that trade. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BobSanders_33 127 Posted October 9, 2018 Fair trade. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
aggiewildlife 0 Posted October 9, 2018 When I can't even tell which side you think is getting hosed on the deal, that's probably a good sign it's not that bad of a deal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 1,652 Posted October 9, 2018 Not a good deal in my opinion Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jaxjag 43 Posted October 10, 2018 When I can't even tell which side you think is getting hosed on the deal, that's probably a good sign it's not that bad of a deal. Usually the team getting the clear stud is the one getting the better deal. Lynch, Drake and Godwin (who I like) are all serviceable but this is three nickels for a quarter. I'd rather have the quarter in my line-up and replace the nickels through the waiver or trade of someone that isn't an anchor of my team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 2,459 Posted October 10, 2018 I'm commish of a 12 team PPR league. I will never veto a trade, and there are no reviews. We generally have a trustworthy group, and sometimes have lopsided trades. But today was one of the worst I've ever seen, and wanted to get other opinions to see if I'm overreacting. One owner just sent Lynch, Drake, and Chris Godwin for Deandre Hopkins. Nothing wrong with it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites