Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
sderk

Man is arrested five days after 'he killed a data programmer with a single punch'

Recommended Posts

I guess the guy really didn't want to put his pit bull on a leash. I hope he enjoys pictures of his pit bull while rotting in jail.

 

One thing I don't understand is why is he only charged with involuntary manslaughter? He voluntarily decided to take his chances by punching the guy which the result could be just what happened. Also, he ran away and didn't help the guy after he saw him smack his head on the ground and who could have been still alive at the moment.

 

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/man-is-arrested-five-days-after-he-killed-a-data-programmer-with-a-single-punch-during-an-argument-after-he-was-asked-to-put-his-pit-bull-on-a-leash/ar-BBS5pOP?ocid=ientp

 

 

Philadelphia police have charged a man with involuntary manslaughter after he punched a fellow dog walker who fell to the ground and smashed his head- and ultimately died from the impact.

 

Matthew Oropeza, 24, turned himself into the police on Thursday. Police say he punched Drew Justice, 38, Saturday night around 9.15pm during an argument in which Oropeza was asked to put his pit bull on a leash because Justice was concerned for the safety of his little Shih Tzu.

 

Police say he punched Justice in the face, causing him to fall backward and hit his head on the ground. After Justice hit the ground, Oropeza bolted from the scene.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pit bull owners- absolute filth. They prove it again and again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The charges could change, but I think that they are going to start with involuntary manslaughter as they don't think that there was intent to kill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The charges could change, but I think that they are going to start with involuntary manslaughter as they don't think that there was intent to kill.

They are possibly threatening him with some additional charges leaving the scene maybe murder, and other things to scare him enough to just accept the original charge. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pit bull owners- absolute filth. They prove it again and again.

 

 

Not true in every case, but owning a Pit Bull is a damb good indicator of ones character in pretty often.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Pit Bulls only attacked their owners no one would own one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Filth. I hope he takes a chomp on his leg and ruins him. I will laugh.

With the luck the Chiefs have I would not be one bit surprised.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The charges could change, but I think that they are going to start with involuntary manslaughter as they don't think that there was intent to kill.

I missed this part at the end of the article:

 

"Oropeza is facing the charges of involuntary manslaughter, simple assault and reckless endangerment of another person."

 

I bet the victim's fiancée is just crushed. She looked so happy in those pics. :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right. How about killing a guy over him asking you to leash your death hound....this guy sounds like a great member of society....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It isn't always sunny in Philadelphia. But it's always trashy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait just a second. He was a data programmer? Is that a new "group" we're trying to bring awareness to? Was this a hate crime?

 

Or is the media subconsciously telling us he was a poosay?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not true in every case, but owning a Pit Bull is a damb good indicator of ones character in pretty often.

 

This. One of the smartest guys I know owns one but when asked why he owns one 'cuz she's focking bada$$ man'.

 

The liability risk associated just is not worth owning one. Do insurance companies jack up their premiums if you do own one? If not, they probably should.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im in 100% support of banning the ownership of pitbulls. If you own one now you are grandfathered in, but thats it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im in 100% support of banning the ownership of pitbulls. If you own one now you are grandfathered in, but thats it.

This won't work. Some communities do ban them. So now there's whole groups of people who own American bulldogs. ;-).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This won't work. Some communities do ban them. So now there's whole groups of people who own American bulldogs. ;-).

Someone should come up with a number. Pit bulls and any dog that has X% pit bull in them is now illegal. Boom done, go get a golden retriever ya hooligan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im in 100% support of banning the ownership of pitbulls. If you own one now you are grandfathered in, but thats it.

 

I am going to help you here, dont say this out loud or people will pretend you are racist....YWIA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait just a second. He was a data programmer? Is that a new "group" we're trying to bring awareness to? Was this a hate crime?

 

Or is the media subconsciously telling us he was a poosay?

Maybe he's still programmed with Punch cards?

 

 

Hey hey, 70s humor...😁

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×