Melvinbet 5 Posted October 19, 2006 I was offered Colston for Coles. Last week I would have taken it in a heartbeat but after Cole's performance on Sunday I'm not sure now. I am thinking that Cole's value is high right now though and it may be the best time to trade him. He didn't do much for me in a few weeks and as a result I didn't play him Sunday. Colston seems more consistent and Brees really likes him. I don't know what to do. Please help! Thanks for any input. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
elementsk8desgns 0 Posted October 19, 2006 if you can use colsten as a TE in your league i would do it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fantasy master 0 Posted October 19, 2006 It's a wash. No reason to make the trade unless you prefer one over the other as they are both pretty much the same. Mine.......... http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=245774 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jazzkatt 0 Posted October 19, 2006 i'd stay put, horns sudden production worries me. chad is back this year and thats great 4 coles mine http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=245763 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Melvinbet 5 Posted October 19, 2006 No I am not in a Yahoo league so Colston is just a WR in my league. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lily 0 Posted October 19, 2006 I like Colston more because he gets more sniffs at the endzone... please answer http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=245752 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bobpate17 0 Posted October 19, 2006 if colston is just WR then I would stick with coles. thanks for mine. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sturbo 0 Posted October 19, 2006 No real reason to make the trade, although I do expect Colston to start lighting it up once more now that defences have to worry about Horn again. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=245842 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimstruble 0 Posted October 19, 2006 I would try for a better defense instead of colson-Your receivers even without Coles are solid http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=245126 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TDhauler 0 Posted October 19, 2006 Agreed that it's a wash. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=245850 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dalie 2 Posted October 20, 2006 One factor to look at is where they play, Coles home is outdoors in NY in winter and plays more away games the same way then weather becomes a factor alot more then for Colston who is in a dome half the time guaranteed plus in a sothern division so winter weather is less of a factor. The more it snows or colder it is the more teams tend to run. I would go Colston Mine? http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=245858 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Free Willis 0 Posted October 20, 2006 I would stick with Coles. I think he is too much to give up for Colston at this point. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=245869 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
throttlers 0 Posted October 20, 2006 I'd take Colston. I think he will continue to be a little more consistent than Coles. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=245867 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bauman88 0 Posted October 20, 2006 Id rather have colston. I think Horn blowin' up will help colston. Take the double team to horn. see me http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=245871 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Melvinbet 5 Posted October 20, 2006 What do you mean by a better defense? I had the Ravens but I decided through a multiple trade that the Eagle Def would be just as good. They have nearly the same fantasy points in my league and I foresee the Ravens not keeping up with their performances of the early part of the year. The only defense I would be interested in is Chicago but the owner with that defense will not sell. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ffsmack 0 Posted October 20, 2006 Yeah, I would just stick with Coles. Thanks for mine Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Connorsdad 38 Posted October 20, 2006 This is pretty even. I would do this trade. Colston over Coles Thanks for answering mine ! Goodluck!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PiRadii 0 Posted October 20, 2006 Keep Coles, he's a proven commodity. 2 bad weeks, one he was injured and shouldn't have played. You do have the WRs to gamble, so if you want to go with the unknown then go with Colston, but I would stay with Coles. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Orange in NJ 0 Posted October 20, 2006 I would stick with Coles. He's number1 in NY with looks/touches. Colston after a fast start is the 2nd target in NO at least for the moment. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ryedog 0 Posted October 20, 2006 At first I thought this might be a tough decision but its really not. Gotta stick with Coles! He is much more explosive. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
enoto 0 Posted October 21, 2006 Colston for me! Thanks for mine Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimstruble 0 Posted October 21, 2006 What do you mean by a better defense? I had the Ravens but I decided through a multiple trade that the Eagle Def would be just as good. They have nearly the same fantasy points in my league and I foresee the Ravens not keeping up with their performances of the early part of the year. The only defense I would be interested in is Chicago but the owner with that defense will not sell. Philly getting dinged up in the secondary and face a brutal schedule going forward starting week 12-Indy,Carolina,Wash,NYG,and Dallas in week 16 Coles for Colson is just a wash at best. Your replies are about 50/50 each way. dont make a trade just to trade unless you can improve yourself. I think your team is great and IMO can be improved at DEF Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skierdude1000 0 Posted October 21, 2006 Coles is a veteran with a QB who loves him and knows him and a defense that isn't playing too well (lots of offense opportunities) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites