Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/28/2026 in all areas

  1. Name one Communist/Socialist country that "voted" itself out of Communism/Socialism. Go ahead. Try. I mean, you can't be this retarded, can you?
    3 points
  2. Somehow they keep winning Democrat Primaries and appearing on the ballot as democrats.
    2 points
  3. Yeah, okay little guy. You go with that. You're known for gurgling the glory-hole propaganda slop so this is just par for the course for you. Your delusion is real.
    2 points
  4. I'm speaking to politicians. If Senate Republicans were itching for this they could find a way to work around the current vote. Also- public polls on this are stupid because the general public is stupid and doesn't understand the full effect the law has. They are just being asked "ID for voting?" and saying yes
    2 points
  5. These laws- if passed- will disproportionally hurt Republican voters....but I guess whatever- go for it. It is telling that many Republicans are not thrilled about this. I wouldn't be looking to do that....but I'm not running for office.
    2 points
  6. It must be a half year since I have ate fast food. Unless a coffee on the way out of town counts. Back in HS they had the dollar menu. A kid I knew worked there and got food for a 3rd of the price. He would order a bunch of mcdoubles and hot and spicy chicken sandwiches for 33 cent a piece and it was all ready by the time we got there. Maybe a 5 minute walk. Would walk back with 20 some items. We would eat a couple and go back to school and sell it for 2 for $3. Didnt make much but beer money is beer money back then. Good times.
    2 points
  7. Cuz sex is cheap? Well, for those of us that aren't peefoam.
    2 points
  8. Beef 'N Cheddar for me, but regardless, I do love Arby's. Oh, and a cherry turnover please
    2 points
  9. I looked up a local pizza place website yesterday and saw large cheese was 10.99, so i ordered one. when I got there the lady said 19.50. I said umm the website says 10.99, she says “we no longer have access to the website” I say “you no longer have my business” and I walked out
    2 points
  10. That was a nice flurry of picks. Good start to the day.
    2 points
  11. Wordle 1,865 2/6* Framed #1600 https://framed.wtf Framed - One Frame Challenge #603 https://framed.wtf/one-frame Framed - Title Shot Challenge #419 https://framed.wtf/titleshot
    2 points
  12. Wendy's baconator
    2 points
  13. Let’s take these claims one at a time: “He always knew it didn’t come from a wet market.” The newly released diary entries reportedly show that by January 26, 2020, Fauci wrote that the Huanan seafood market was not the original source of the outbreak but rather an “amplifier”—meaning the virus was already spreading among humans before the market became associated with many cases. He also wrote that he still believed the virus had jumped from animals to humans somewhere, just not necessarily at the market itself. That’s different from saying he knew it came from a laboratory. The diary, as reported, reflects skepticism that the market was the origin, not a definitive conclusion that a lab leak occurred. The origin of COVID-19 remains disputed, with U.S. agencies and scientists still divided. “He always knew the fatality rate was like a tenth of what he was touting publicly.” According to reports on the diary, Fauci wrote in February 2020 that the mortality rate might be 0.2–0.3% if many mild or asymptomatic infections were being missed. However, there is important context. Early in the pandemic, experts distinguished between the case fatality rate (CFR)—deaths among confirmed cases—and the infection fatality rate (IFR)—deaths among all infected people, including undiagnosed cases. Early public estimates of CFR were often around 2–3% because testing was limited. Fauci also publicly stated as early as late February 2020 that if many undetected infections existed, the true fatality rate could be considerably less than 1%, which is broadly consistent with later understanding.
    2 points
  14. 1 point
  15. You can just stop right there with your phantastical version of reality. Bourbon Street is the worst for a spread of virus like this. Worse than the other Bourbon Street in Key Weat where we (I) know covid cases were spreading in December 2019. You go 10 miles south and you're accross the levee and hanging out with coonasses and gaters. You're not in the "loads of room to roam" south. Then there are all your posts at FBGs where you were testing your family EVERY SINGLE DAY. Scared as a poosy cat. You masked up plenty liar.
    1 point
  16. It's how most on the left are.
    1 point
  17. posting on a messageboard when 75% of the people have you you on ignore?
    1 point
  18. Well, if they replace or do away with the Constitution, the Senate, those don't seem to be recoverable things. There's no voting out of that, it's more a situation of a split being necessary.
    1 point
  19. I miss Biff Burger. The burger came with BBQ sauce. And they had tater tots. Oh and it was flame grilled.
    1 point
  20. Been reading a lot about this recently, obviously and someone made a great comment that you can vote for this if you want. Democratic socialism and all the great things that some of you believe it will bring. You can vote your way into it, but you will not be able to vote your way out.
    1 point
  21. Blah. This must be the new spin... 1) Minorities are too dumb to get ID's (rejected as obviously racist) 2) Married women wont be able to vote. (Rejected as this obviously silly and affects both sides) 3) Republicans will be hurt MORE than dems! (an attempt to get the right on their side) What's the next spin? Stay tuned!
    1 point
  22. Scrap the brown off, that’s the protective layer.
    1 point
  23. There's also a saying don't let the harms outweigh the benefits. And the harm of possibly disenfranchising 1000x than those you are trying to protect us against isn't worth it based on all available data. But honestly, that's not the real reason for these laws at all and most everyone knows it.
    1 point
  24. It used to be. Then the proprietor got himself kilt.
    1 point
  25. I never do this. But then your post reminded me of playing Metroid on the NES. After you died, to continue you had to write down a long code. A couple transposing mistakes causing me to lose hours of progress taught me to cross the hell outta the zeros. Fock you, Mother Brain!
    1 point
  26. Get off your high horse, ya flaming hypocrite. I'm just catching up here after having a busy few days. This is the first I've seen of the responses. 1. I admittedly chose the case randomly and did not go looking to cherry pick something that would simply buttress my arguments. This is called operating in good faith. You should give it a try sometime. 2. This has NOTHING to do with muh Biden, so your points about that are irrelevant. 3. How exactly is the story "100% incorrect?" The case happened, lower courts ruled against what the admin was doing, so as is normal with Trump, it went all the way to his friendly SCOTUS. Alito and Thomas are 100% partisan, so they typically go along with anything Trump dictates; this case was no exception. The 6-3 decision stood on an argument that the judiciary could not review the decision of the Secretary (Noem in this case). The curveball is that the judiciary can review and determine whether Noem went through the proper channels prior to canceling TPS. It is under question whether that happened, and what the true motive was for ending the TPS protections. 4. What is also questioned, though not by the majority of course, is whether the decision was made due to racial animus, which was the thrust of the lower court rulings and plaintiff's arguments. Trump's own quotes were the evidence there, along with Noem's. Here's a few of them: Interestingly, the majority seemed to completely ignore these quotes and delivered a victory for cockwomble. Funny how that worked. So here we are, with me disagreeing with the court ruling that yes, admittedly went against what I think was the proper decision. I think that's what you and your ilk would call JUDICIAL ACTIVISM derp. What I am NOT doing is advocating for anyone to ignore the decision, or threaten/impeach any justices, even though I feel it was a complete travesty. So, you wrote the bolded before I had a chance to respond. Gonna correct yourself and admit to being FOS? I'll wait. But not hold my breath.
    1 point
  27. Fnord is 100% making my point here. If the Save act potentially makes it equally more challenging for both sides to actually register and vote, then why the crying? I know he isn't opposed to this because he wants a bunch of illegals to vote. So my question is why don't we do this? Need a legit reason why. No ID? BS reason. I sincerely believe the #1 reason the dems in power want this is for illegals to be able to vote. It is impossible to convince me otherwise on this topic. And wouldn't dems LOVE It if the save act passes because no republican would legitimately be able to cry fraud. Which fixes the other thing they have been crying about for 7 years now
    1 point
  28. who is it really disenfranchising? and why can't the solution be to both secure the elections and then also work to help those "disenfranchised" people vote? What argument against voter ID laws, or auditing voter rolls, or really anything designed to make sure that only american citizens are voting in our elections are impacting or "disenfranchising" a group of voters to such an extent that their party (who cares about them oh so much) can't easily work with them to clear any potential hurdles? Specific to Voter Id Laws... Opposition Opponents of voter ID laws may argue: •Voter identification laws are a burden for many voters. Why? they don't have ID? Why would you not want to have ID? They don't have cars or access to public transportation to get to DMVs? Start a program to help them then... they are your voters. •Voter identification laws harm voter turnout. Why? Because those voters don't have ID?? ...... see above. •Voter identification laws target minorities. Why are anti voter ID people assuming minorities don't have ID? •In-person voter fraud is rare I've already covered this one. Democratic Party wants it to be seen as rare and that it could not impact any election. shouldn't we want all american citizens to have a form of identification and to have it on them at all times?
    1 point
  29. Conversely, I think those that support SAVE are trying to convince themselves that they're doing the right thing disenfranchising voters in the name of "security." We'll see, though. If it actually passes I suspect there'll be a LOT of pissed off Republicans that will find out too late that they can't vote, either.
    1 point
  30. Leaving the borders open and letting untested hombres, senoritas and thousands of Mohammed’s into the country during the China Virus was the ultimate tell that it was all BS.
    1 point
  31. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cr49znlz5ggo It's a joke that Libs think Trump should have been prosecuted for having classified docs, even though he had been President and as such can declassify anything he wants, but Biden shouldn't despite having classified documents from BEFORE he was President and was only allowed to view in a SCIF. Just shows their bias and TDS. No logical person could take that stance.
    1 point
  32. 1 point
  33. Mamdani is the mayor of New York, of course he should speak at the 9/11 memorial ceremony, but I'd bring a bottle of Pepto-Bismol. I very much doubt he has an inner Guiliani to channel. I suspect 9 year-old Zoran was jumping up and down on his bed in glee on 9/11.
    1 point
  34. The TDS has set in heavy on that guy. He's got "it". Sad but true.
    1 point
  35. Good to see you posting. We'd had a large number of suspensions over the weekend, and until now, I'd presumed you'd been caught up in that. Also, Trump's parent comment is dumb as dirt.
    1 point
  36. It doesn't help that most states tax prepared food. That's 8.40% in my town here in South Central Minnesota. Pretty sure it's 6.875% state & the remainder is local add-ons.
    1 point
  37. Had firehouse once , it’s better than subway but it was poor. At least the one I tried
    1 point
  38. The pile of sh1t should be publicly executed along with birx, hotez, gottlieb, that old fucktard (can't remember his name), walensky & the pfizer and moderna CEOs too. All of them, among others, should be hung. They knowingly killed more people than any serial killer or dictator in the planet's history. Sadly, the Rs are weak losers who are all talk & zero action. He will walk out of this hearing totally unscathed. They are so weak they won't even take aways his obscene pension. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2026/jul/27/dr-fauci-exposes-fame-hungry-egotistical-lying-maniac/ The POS had this planned soon after Trump was elected.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...