Jump to content

PATSSOX

Members
  • Content Count

    8,143
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

22 Excellent

About PATSSOX

  • Rank
    FF Geek
  • Birthday 10/27/2004

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    red sox nation

Recent Profile Visitors

13,270 profile views
  1. PATSSOX

    Can the Chiefs Do the Impossible?

    Chiefs win 28-14
  2. PATSSOX

    Tannerhill over Rogers?

    Id take the 21 Dak got ya
  3. PATSSOX

    Dalvin Cook says he is fine....Dr. Chao disagrees

    Speaking Thursday, Vikings coach Mike Zimmer said Dalvin Cook (chest) will play against the Lions and "be close to 100 percent." Cook has said all week that his health won't be an issue for Week 14, and now his coach agrees. In a mini slump, Cook has a potential eruption spot in a Lions defense surrendering the third most running back fantasy points. The concern is that the Vikes build a big early lead and then give Cook a breather after his Week 13 scare. Regardless, Cook is a clear top-five play even with the injury question mark. SOURCE: Chris Tomasson on Twitter Dec 5, 2019, 3:32 PM ET
  4. PATSSOX

    Dalvin Cook says he is fine....Dr. Chao disagrees

    Heck no. They need a win so Cook gonna play through it. No reason why they would try and save him or they damn well better not
  5. PATSSOX

    Dalvin Cook says he is fine....Dr. Chao disagrees

    I like to hear that. Im rolling with Cook so he either gonna probably knock me out or move me on
  6. PATSSOX

    Tannerhill over Rogers?

    Cant sit Rogers vs Washington. Lose with your best. Ive got worse situation with Brees vs SF Ive got SF D/ST and Brees im tempted to pick up Tannehill or even Goff vs Seattle
  7. PATSSOX

    Standing Question....

    I went with your explanation. I am commish and we have always done by points in these situations. And i am #4 seed so i would have been #2 seed but i think i went with the right way.
  8. PATSSOX

    Standing Question....

    That makes sense too and didnt even think of that. But then you could say why is #3 seed ahead of #4 seed when the #4 seed won 2 of 3 from the #3 seed. We dont have a division so next tie breaker goes to points.
  9. PATSSOX

    Standing Question....

    We play each other 3 times we play 2 games a week. So it goes to points since none of the 3 teams beat both the other 2 and we all split
  10. PATSSOX

    Standing Question....

    We moved to just all play in one division to make sure the best 8 teams make it. Sometimes in division play a team can get screwed
  11. PATSSOX

    Standing Question....

    Why it matters so much is that the way we do our playoffs the #1 seed picks between #5-#8 who he wants to play first round followed by #2 who gets to pick between the remaining seeds so its actually a pretty big deal.
  12. PATSSOX

    Standing Question....

    We have #2-#4 teams all tie with 16-10 record. The way CBS has it ranked the #2 seed lost to the #3 seed 1-2 in season series and beat the #4 seed 0-3. The #4 seed beat the #3 seed 2-1 and lost to #1 seed 0-3 making it where none of the 3 teams won season series over both the other seeds. So our next tie breaker would be points and the way it comes out is the #4 seed has most points followed by the #3 seed and then the #2 seed. So help me if im wrong but should the seeding be reversed and since the next tie break is points the #4 seed should actually be #2 seed, #3 seed be #3 seed and the #2 seed should actually drop down to #4
  13. PATSSOX

    Jets > Patriots

    According to rules it was right call but that doesnt make it right. That was awful
  14. PATSSOX

    RB Wayne Gallman

    Darkwa 21 for 117 vs top ranked rush defense!!
  15. PATSSOX

    RB Wayne Gallman

    Im struggling for RB's and just putting Darkwa on my bench right now. Im done with Perine i had him earlier and after watching him on Sunday or Monday Night what ever that game was a few weeks ago i dont want any part of him. But probably wrong but him running strait ahead into back of his linemen all night was not very encouraging.
×