jonmx

World peace??? Biden is too worried about saving his uncle from the cannibals.

25 percent of Americans are rich? Typical authoritarian bastard point. We are only going after 25 percent of the population! You bastards love your slavery.

She probably belongs in a mental institution. Feds and leftist states typically supports freaks like that, so I would be surprised if they came down on her too hard.

More than 25 percent of Americans own some crypto. The rich are capable of hiding it better. The vast majority of IRS efforts will go after the low-hanging fruit. There will be some targeted take downs of a few rich, ie. those wealthy one who are not part of the establishment. Laws are only for those who are not playing the power game correctly.

The law makes no difference to this judge. The judge is allowing this case to go forward and no one has made a specific allegation of the crime this is connected with. It is crazy.

Correct, but in this case the misdemeanor is meaningless. They can not charge Trump with a misdemeanor because the statue of limitations has passed. The only relevant part for this case is the felony part, which by itself falsification is not a crime.

As usual you show you can cut and paste, but really don't understand any of it. The key is these business records besides allegedly being falsified, have to be related to some other felony. Trump paying hush money out of his business funds is not some a violation campaign finance laws, it is not unlawfully trying to influence an election, and the statue of limitations is well passed for any state tax law. This case sucks legally. It can only result in a conviction if the judge makes the jury instruction such that they do not include key elements of this crime.

It 100 percent absolutely is not a crime. As it says above, it requires that the "intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime. So no, falsifying business records is not a crime. It has to be part of another crime. There is no crime in New York about paying hush money. The prosecution hints that it has something to do with campaign law violations, but they have not specifically identified what it is. Federal agencies investigated this but never found anything to charge Trump with.

Explain what he is on trail for and all the underlying elements required.

There is no crime to convict him of. The prosecutor created a crime and thr judge is going along with it. This case is a judicial lynching.

The crazier the left makes someone look, the closer to the truth thst person is.

A unicorn. An honest Democrat.

MSNBC is upset! They must get upset too, because they are morons who can't think for themselves.

Charged with what? Reporting? This is a public hearing. Talking about what happened in court is not illegal.

JFC....you are fuking dumb.

There are reporters in the court room and it is widely reported. A potential juror repeats leftist talking points and MSNBC wonders why they think she is a leftist. Gee, I don't know....

Since MSNBC says so you believe it? Because some leftist snowflake says she is afraid of pressure from her friends it is somehow FoxNews intimidating jurors. Your are brainwashed.

I see you are quadrupling down on being retarded. It's a bold strategy, squisy.

You are one if the dumbest MFers there are. I gave you the controlling case which sets the precedent for a court setting a gag order. Because you are so fuking stupid not to see how it covers this case is not my problem. Go fuk yourself idiot.

RFK jr. hired a very good lawyer that is helping him jump through the hoops to get on the ballot in all 50 states. RFK jr. was really about to give up, which is why he was considering the Libertarian ticket. But this lawyer helped turn the effort around. The Biden team has offered this lawyer millions to stop helping RFK jr., a lucrative job and a possible SC appointment. These are the slimey games played by corrupt establishment who don't give a crap about Democracy. The same folks offered Kari Lake $3 million to step out of the Senate race now that she has a real chance to win. The level of corruption is far more than we know.

1. The Supreme Court not hearing a case is not any statement from the court about the legitimacy of the case. It means the court simply does not have the time or the compelling interest to hear the case. 2. The principle of free speech whether a lawyer or the client bears no meaning to the ruling. Besides the very non-case that you provided also had to do with a lawyer. 3. I never said unlimited. Once again you lie and make a strawman I provided a case where there was an actual ruling and the legal precedent that was decided. You make a meaningless point about a case the Court decided not to rule on. Once again you prove to be an idiot.

I never said it can not be limited. But there are very specific requirements which must be met, which none of Trump's statements came even remotely close to meeting. The controlling ruling is in the link below: https://www.scotusblog.com/archives/Reasonable/05-1505.pdf The court explained that a gag order must meet “the clear and present danger test.” Id. at 600. The court stated: “Such a threat must be specific, not general. It must be much more than a possibility or a 'reasonable likelihood' in the future. Trump made no threat. Pointing out the judge's daughter has an interest in a positive outcome of this case because she has raised $90 million for the Biden's administration (specifically Kamala) by advertising for Trump's conviction, is not a threat. It is a fact. Pointing out a clear conflict of interest relating to a judge is a legal arguement. New York has completely ignored the US Supreme Court precedent and just made-up an exception to apply to Trump.

Trump can not send the National Guard to locations he lacks jurisdiction, which is most anywhere inside this country. Trump offered them, and the Mayor and Pelosi turned it down due to 'optics'.

Fun fact, that was a new standard made up by the courts in New York specifically for Trump. The Supreme Court has said the exact opposite. Your points are always so fuking ignorant. And BTW, Trump has made no threats towards anyone and especially not the jury.

Institutions are fine until they become extremely corrupted. Once Institutions start to routinely suppress the voices of dissent, they no longer are deserving of respect. Without transparency and oversight, Institutions quickly become corrupt. It does not matter if it is the Catholic Church or the National Institute of Health, over time the corruption grows until those institutions become evil. The sins of lust and greed prevail in darkness. Our institutions are in desparate need of a reset. I put far more thought into this than you have, whose mind has been endlessly lied to by those very institutions you blindly trust.