-
Content Count
4,461 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
15
Everything posted by jonmx
-
Trump's Historic Criminal Trial (David Pecker's testimony continues)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
Latest polls show 17 percent of Black voters would vote for former president today – more than twice the number in 2016. -
Ram Jam broke up just after their first album hit the streets.
-
Who here still supports Jan 6 attack?
jonmx replied to The Psychic Observer's topic in The Geek Club
Well there are three which some of the most important in this term. 1. Keeping Trump off the ballot won at every level and was declared an iron-clad ruling by the media experts. Slapped down 9-0 by the Supreme court. 2. Yesterday, the court heard the case about obstruction of official proceedings being applied to the Jan 6 rioters along with Trump. 14 of 15 judges on the lower level says it was a correct application. That is going to get smacked down by 7-2. 3. None of the lower courts thought the President held immunity after they leave office, even for official acts. This Supreme Court will unamaniously overturn those idiotic rulings, the only question is what limits is put on it. The lower courts have been corrupted taken over by TDS. -
Biden has even cheated by selling off our oil reserves so we are down from around 700 million barrels under Trump to around 300 million barrels today. We are now dangerously at the mercy of being dependant up foreign oil down to about on 2 weeks supply.
-
I said war. Biden has us on the brink of war on at least two fronts and probably three. The world has not been in this much chaos since WWII.
-
Border control. Staying out of wars.
-
Trump's Historic Criminal Trial (David Pecker's testimony continues)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
I see, so you did not read the article. -
Trump's Historic Criminal Trial (David Pecker's testimony continues)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
Did you read you article. It says so right there: Several months later, after federal prosecutors said in a court filing that they had “effectively concluded” their investigation without bringing additional charges Federal authorities thoroughly investigated the case and concluded there were no violations on Trump's part. So then the state went into action and found obscure laws about fraudulent records that they could possibly charge Trump on, due to some questionable notes on check stubs. The problem is they had to link these so-called fraudulent records to some felony. The whole case revolves around insisting that Trump's payments were felony violations of campaign laws, which the feds have already concluded that it wasn 't. The case is a complete farse and this NY judge is playing along. -
Trump's Historic Criminal Trial (David Pecker's testimony continues)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
Like I give a fuk what actual bootlicking morons like you who worship at the alter of authoritarians asholes.. It is your type we had to fight wars against to get or keep the freedoms we have. The only point you kind of get is his failure last time around was he did have too many corrupt backstabbing bastards in his administration who bootlick for the authoritarians like you do. Only fuking brainwashed idiots hate free speech and hate a fair justice system. -
Trump's Historic Criminal Trial (David Pecker's testimony continues)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
Lol...there is one man standing up against the corrupt FBI, White House, DoJ, Soro-Prosecutors, and corrupt judges.. Here is a hint for the really really really stupid people. One man is not the establishment. The establishment is the corrupt institutions which have become way too powerful you stupid cok-suking moron. -
Trump's Historic Criminal Trial (David Pecker's testimony continues)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
None of my points were hyperbole. These cases are a gross abuse of power in a desparate attempt to help Biden win re-election. Your hatred of Trump blinds you. -
Nobody told me there would be a test!
-
Trump's Historic Criminal Trial (David Pecker's testimony continues)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
Hush money is not a crime. Banging porn stars is not a crime. Writing a memo on those payments saying legal expenses is not a crime. New York is twisting laws and inventing crimes to.charge Trump with. They have illegally ignored the statue of limitations. They are illegally upgrading the law from a misdemeanor to a felony. They are lying about some kind of federal campaign contribution violation was done. These lawyers and judges are abusing the system to do real interference in election and you bootlickers cheer on these abuses. I seriously can't stand you lying hypocrits. You overlook our government colluding to suppress illegal activities by the Biden's which was also illegal interference in an election and you have no issue. Trump is not the one who interefered with the Democratic process. Fuk people like you who cheer on these authoritarian tactics. You hate every principle this country stands for -
Trump's Historic Criminal Trial (David Pecker's testimony continues)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
I hope you said your Sieg Heils before bed. -
Trump's Historic Criminal Trial (David Pecker's testimony continues)
jonmx replied to squistion's topic in The Geek Club
Our institutions are no different than organized crime. -
Who here still supports Jan 6 attack?
jonmx replied to The Psychic Observer's topic in The Geek Club
Several cases recently which were universally decided were flipped by the Supreme. 9-0. The leftists in the lower courts can't help themselves. -
It is so ironic that bootlickers view these 94 extremely frivolous felony charges as Trump's fault. It is not a bunch of Trump-hating Soros funded prosecutors trying to interfere in the election.
-
Who here still supports Jan 6 attack?
jonmx replied to The Psychic Observer's topic in The Geek Club
I am pretty sure it was Thomas or Alito. Even one of the liberal justices seemed concerned that the prosecutor's interpretation was dangerous. It could go 7-2. The only downside is the defense attorney did a pretty horrible job of answering questions. But the prosecutor got peppered much harder. -
Who here still supports Jan 6 attack?
jonmx replied to The Psychic Observer's topic in The Geek Club
The government attorney did not have a good answer for that line of questioning. She tried to suggest there was some criteria for distiguising acts that only have minimal impact. When asked where that was in the law, she had no answer. Several justices suggested that any disrupted form of protesting could be considered a violation under their interpretation. I would be surprised if the 330 verdicts were not overturned or sent back for re-examination -
Exactly....Fani, Jack Smith, Merchan, Alvin Bragg, and Engoran should be hung for treason. Those scumbags are a disgrace to the American justice system.
-
Who here still supports Jan 6 attack?
jonmx replied to The Psychic Observer's topic in The Geek Club
This case started off bad. The defense attorney did not do a good job at articulating the arguement and answering questions. The prosecuting attorney got off to a solid start, but as the questions dug deeper she could not clearly explain why these charges could not be levied against any protests which disrupted any proceeding. It should be a 7-2 reversal which could likely put in jeapordy 330 convictions. The judges were very skeptical of both sides arguments. The prosecutor was a better attorney, but did very little to assure the court that the prosecution's interpretation of the law will not criminalize protests. -
Who here still supports Jan 6 attack?
jonmx replied to The Psychic Observer's topic in The Geek Club
Yeah, freedom, equality...such ridiculous concepts. -
Who here still supports Jan 6 attack?
jonmx replied to The Psychic Observer's topic in The Geek Club
We empowered our government to protect CITIZENS. Black mobs have attacked hundreds of businesses. If our government don't protect citizens, fuk the Capitol. Congressmen are not kings. They are servants. That is what you bootlickers do not understand. Your tongue is so far up the elitists butts, you have no concept of the principles our country was founded on. We have to stop putting these bastards on pedestals. They are just citizens, their rights are not superior to ours. Equal Protection under the law. -
Who here still supports Jan 6 attack?
jonmx replied to The Psychic Observer's topic in The Geek Club
Lol....yet in the hundreds and hundreds of cases where a black mob did that....Not a damn thing was done. Are you really this much of a fuking lying moron or just a stupid moron? -
Who here still supports Jan 6 attack?
jonmx replied to The Psychic Observer's topic in The Geek Club
Until they come under the scrutiny of the people where their actions are transparent and they can be held accountable, they are doing more damage than good. I AM FOR GOOD GOVERNMENT WHICH IS ANSWERABLE TO THE PEOPLE. What we have now is corruption and abuse.