skinsrule05

This isn't news. We already knew he was missing today for his agents funeral. I'm not saying he is healthy just that today was no indication as far as his health. We won't know anything until practice tomorrow.

That can never be the case. Out of all the leagues I am in he was never picked up earlier than a couple weeks ago. So you wasted a spot on someone you could have gotten in week 10. Your argument is the same as someone who took Ken Walker in the first this year. Yes you can say he was worth a first round pick but you didn’t have to take him there.

Last I heard was he isn't playing this week. Maybe week 14. He is a playoff candidate at the most. And unless he ramps up very quickly he could be tough to use even then.

I think this is a good tick-up for Hock. With Detroit getting healthier he was going to be even more of an after thought. Now he will be a top red zone threat.

I was thinking along these lines. Anderson & CMC accounted for 40% of the team targets (11.6 targets per week). Those targets have to go to someone.

This is a good take. I don’t think any of those would move the needle for me, maybe London. I think BR is someone to hold. There are reasons he could get better: - they start throwing to him - it takes a few games for the rookie to hit his stride like Hall did - they are getting two O-line starters back at some point

Half point

Would you go BRob over Hunt?

I would second this. Drafted 6th in my league and he is RB24 so far. I would think it was a two week aberration but I don't see many reasons why it will get better.

I’m tied going into tonight. I need Miles to outscore Jefferson/hurts. I’m not too optimistic.

Maybe not through the whole season but week 1 they have the NYJ. That is a good play then you can throw them back to the wire. They are not a DST you are going to want to hold onto.

Way too early. He used to be a value when he was going 9/10. That is why people got so high on him. Now that he is going in the 6th I feel the value is gone. 3rd just forget about it. Ignore the name, how much would you pay for an RB on a bottom-tier offense that won't be a big part of the passing game? Oh, and he is a rookie RB drafted in the 4th round that maxed out at 108 carries a season. If for some reason you still like his potential at least wait until the 5th to take him.

A guy in my league got to keep Kupp in the 3rd and paired him with Jefferson in the first. That's a stacked WR tandem.

Is the timing the same as last week that they would need to activate him by 4pm on Saturday?

Given the matchup and AB out, if Godwin plays he is a must start.

Jones to get me 15 (4 pt / TD). Hoping the KC defense is as bad as they looked last week.

Might have been the wrong week to make these predictions.

I have him in one league and am holding him for now. I’m kicking myself because I didn’t bid on Johnson because of it. I have real doubts he is back this year but I was hoping to hear something more definitive.

I was wondering this too. He isn't in any of my leagues because he isn't on IR. It sounds like that is just an extra bench spot in his league.

I can't picture him having much value this year. Between having to learn a new offense and possible suspension its tough to see him getting much playing time this year.

So this would be arguing against taking RBs early and hope to get the top waiver wire/late round RB.

Spot on, by taking RB with your top couple picks you are almost guaranteeing that some of your top pick will be injured.

I highly doubt Carson is back at anytime this season.

I’m probably leaning that way but it is so hard to sit him even if it is only a small possibility he plays a full game.

This is good info. I didn't think Darnold would have been better without the rushing. Add in the WR injuries on Tenn and the over all team quality it has me leaning away from Tannehill. I wouldn't have thought that coming into this thread.