mobb_deep

Yah I'd try to dump Davis after a few weeks. The only problem is they play a couple pretty decent run D's 3 of the first 4 weeks. Too bad Houston doesn't play STL, SF, and Zona, and themselves the first 4 weeks. I like your team but you really need a #2 WR. Matt Jones isn't even the #1 on his team much less a #2 or even strong #3 FF WR. Rod Smith will be a good #3 but you need to try and get a #2. I don't know if anyone will bite on DD until he puts up a few good weeks but that's your best bet. If not I guess you can try to trade off Deshaun Foster or FWP but I think you're going to get more people trying to buy low then pay high on them too. I'm sure a decent bye week QB can be found on the wire in a 10 team league but Bulger gets pretty beat up behind that Lamb rush d. You're most likely going to need a QB for atleast 2 or 3 more weeks aside from the bye as Bulger will be hurt. I'd feel alot better about only having 1 QB if it was someone like Manning who you can pretty much depend on for all 16. Unfortunately your catalyst is also your crutch. Having RB depth is great but everyone knows you got more RB's then you need so they're not gonna pay as much for 1.

right on man. email sent.

I don't want to spoil but I watch the live feed and I'm "pretty sure" *if* Janelle wins veto that Kaysar will go up. However I think between Kaysar and James, James will go home. look at the votes for eviction... Janelle - James Howie - James Will and Boogie - James (they promised Janelle and I believe they want to go final 4 with Howie/Janelle) Marcellas - probably Kaysar even though he wants to gay sex0r him Chicken - probably Kaysar cuz he's a knob Erika - probably Kaysar even though she wants him as much as Marcellas... So even if all 3 floaters vote Kaysar out I still think James will have the other 4 votes cast against him. That's the way I hope it turns out atleast...

Listen guy. I didn't attack you, or even project my original comments towards you. Nor did I attack you in my first reply after your original attack. I understand that you're just fishing me in (I bite), and this is giving you whatever pleasure people of your mental state get from this type of useless banter. I must however insist that you don't stick me into the same group of sad focks you find yourself in. I assure you I find no pleasure in insulting complete strangers for absolutely no reason. Ahh I see. I meant it more like... Guys who have a hard time getting laid would be more likely to put a ring on the first or second fish they caught. Guys with more money generally have an easier time getting laid and obviously paying the bills. I know, I know.... I need to stop listening to Tom Lykus. He's really skewed my whole perception of women/marriage. But, I am born and raised in the land of plastic and silicone (not the Bill Gates type of silicone), so atleast I can blame everything on being a product of my environment! Anyways, I'm sorry for the hijack geeks. I'm a hardcore HK fan and didn't intend on this. I really wanted K Grease to win though. He was a bit of a tool but he had the most skills by a longshot.

Haha, yah you're right. On most of the forum I frequent being 29 (almost 30) puts me into the upper echelon of age, but around here I'm just a baby. I know I'll most likely be singing all of your tunes sometime down the road, but for now I'm pretty apathetic to your plight.

Haha, I'm a guy but please do explain! Are you speaking from a religious perspective? In my opinion, if you're financially successful and have no problem getting laid or don't want any kids then it's pretty useless. Companionship and mutual respect doesn't require a ring or any legal bindings. However if you're looking for a break on your health insurance or someone to split the bills with marriage doesn't sound like such a bad idea.

My response asking why my opinion on older women angers you so greatly? I'm sure in your simple little mind that makes perfect sense to you, so I'll let you have your Geek Board victory lap. Anyways.... Heather Locklear... HOT Pam Anderson... airbrushed Hell even look at touch-up free Eva Longoria pics. She's barely 31-32 and looks pretty damn average to below average without all the photoshop magic. Like I said, plenty of hot 40+ year old women. I just don't think Shania is one of them and even the hot ones aren't even in the same league as a tender, perky, wrinkle free 23 or 24 year old bombshell.

I could care less about Mike's new rules. I just find it silly that you feel the need to personally attack me because I find 40+ year old women generally unattractive. Unless ofcourse you're one of those aforementioned, my opinion really shouldn't provoke such anger. If that is the case or if you're on some sort of antidepressant or anger regulating medication then I do appologize as I'm just generalizing. I understand their are plenty of good looking older women.

Wow, no need to start making personal attacks. We're just stating one anothers opinion here chief. Second, I'm a university educated home owner living in one of the most expensive parts of the United States (and planet), Orange County, California. I'm also dating a "real life" 25 year old girl but would NEVER marry her (or any woman), or have children. Marriage and children are for people who either a] have a hard time getting laid, or b] can't afford their mortgage. Now let's stay away from the name calling and stick to Hell's Kitchen and 40 year old women being used goods. Play nice boys

I'm 29 but make a point of not dating girls over 25.

until she takes her clothes off and shows off her beautiful 42 year old varicose and cottage cheese covered legs. Then ofcourse you got her saggy boobs with stretched out nip's from her 2? kids sucking milk from them. Lets not forget about the beautiful stretch marks on the stomach those same kids lovingly left behind. Listen I don't deny some 40+ year old women are decent looking. Phoebe Cates still looks good, as well as Nicole Kidman. However the amount of women over 30 that are HOT are few and far between, and Shania ain't one of them.

Sorry I don't find 42 year old women attractive. Maybe if I was married to a 40 year old women who's spit out a couple little brats I would. Not to mention Shania dresses and does her hair like some reject out of an 80's movie (oh that's right she's country, they're always about 10 years behind in style). I'm in my late 20's and prefer women like Jessica Alba, Scarlett Johansson, etc. over women almost old enough to be my mother.

Wow, now that's an epiphany. Moments of clarity like this are once in a lifetime. So far looks like Ced Houston is #1 with Blaylock #2 but I wouldn't feel comfortable with either of them if I was J-E-T-S management.

What does not being able to sing have to do with a cooking show? Virginia is not very hot at all, but look at her supporting cast. It's not hard to look hot when you're surrounded by fat lesbians and beedy eyed chain smoking psycho's. It's like winning a beauty contest in some backwoods town. You might be hotter then the other 20 girls in your town but you're still uglier then 99% of the women in LA. Shania Twain looks like a hillbilly Fran Drescher

Volek top 10 QB

All the pretty neon lights over the human treadmill are neat though It's the midwest what do you expect. They don't call the midwest the armpit of America for nothing. It simply sucks on all levels of life.

Because I'm a Lions fan We find happiness in pain.

Little Caesars has 5$ large pepperoni pizza's hot and ready all day long. HTH

I couldn't agree more HTH

Liking everything but your QB's and RB. Vick will kill you all year long. The weeks he is on your bench he will go off and the weeks you put him in he will hurt a hammy or throw 3 int's 0 td's. Plummer is decent but definitely not a top 5 or even 10 FF QB so I wouldn't want to depend on him. You got depth at RB but they're all from the absolutely crappiest teams possible. Sure Chicago's D will keep them in games but that offense is horrible and doesn't allow alot of running room. I know Jones put up decent (think it was top 15) numbers last year but alot of his damage was done against the Lions, Pack, and Vikes which isn't saying much. 09/18 DET 20 for 139 yds 2 TD 10/16 MIN 23 for 89 yds 2 TD 10/30 @DET 22 for 72 yds 0 TD 12/04 GB 19 for 93 yds 0 TD 12/25 @GB 25 for 105 yds 1 TD 01/01 @MIN 12 for 62 yds 0 TD so there's 5 of his 9 TD's. 2 of the other 4 were against Cinci and Atlanta who don't exactly have great D's then he managed 1 against each Pitt and Washington (props for that). Luckily though Chicago plays all 3 divisional rivals the first 3 weeks so if Benson's mangina is hurt and Jones stays with Chicago those first 3 weeks should be golden. Droughns will be your most consistent 20-25 carry per game guy but Clev will be playing from behind quite a bit and Droughn's isn't a good pass catching back like Jordan or Tiki so he won't see much time when they're behind (which is pretty much always). This is an all around good team but I think you spent too many draft picks on RBBC/Hancuff situations. 7/10

I'm struggling with who to take with the 4th pick of my league. We award .5 PPR for RB's and because of this I was going to take Tiki. However now I'm leaning towards Portis due to Saunders use of throwing to RB's and WAS improved o-line/offense. Do you think Portis will either a] get enough completions to warrant this pick, or B] score 2+ more TD's to compensate for the 25 or so completions less he will get over Tiki. I'm even slightly considering passing on both and going right for Lamont but that OAK team scares me. What would you do? Thanks alot,

Yah you need to draft more Houston Texan's this year if you want a successful squad. I don't have access to external emaill at work so I'll send you the league details when I get home later.

Ok let's set it for Wed Aug 23 6:30pm PDT (9:30 eastern). I think a weeknight evening draft should be easiest for everyone. if you're in post in here and email me for the league information/password!

what about the morning/early afternoon of the 26th or a weeknight (6-7ish pm pacific) the week of the 21st-25th. If possible I'd like to do the draft August 26th around 9am pacific (noon eastern), Tuesday the 22nd or Wednesday the 23rd at 7pm west coast. I figure the draft takes about an hour so that should still get the east coast guys in bed with the wives around 11 pm.

Your team sucks just like you do at life. Caddy surely was not the best option at 1.8. I know you're a Tampa homer but wake up. Considering you drafted 8th and Peyton was already gone (most likely in addition to LJohnson, LT2, SA, Portis, Tiki, Edge) you still had Lamont, Sjax, and Ronnie. Personally I'd take any of those 3 (and Rudi) over Caddy and I think most would agree. Hass was a stretch and Delhomme was even more of a stretch. Dunn is not someone I'd want as my #2 RB as he's gonna put up decent yards but expecting more then 5 TD's is crazy. Not to mention your #3 RB is the backup/short yardage back to your #2. Who is going to be your bye week RB, Jerome Bettis? But as I said you pretty much suck at life so a team like this is only fitting for you. Good luck with this man.