Jump to content

Meglamaniac

Members
  • Posts

    9,276
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Posts posted by Meglamaniac

  1. 1 minute ago, Sean Mooney said:

    The post of mine you responded to was me saying: "Notice they don't discuss anything real. It's just the same tired schtick and ignoring content of people's posts."

    That was when you decided this was time for you to jump in on the discussion and say "LOL

    Says the guy counting and calling posters he doesn't like  Sycophant"

     

    So again I will ask a very simple question- what in the posts I received in response to what I posted from any of those 4 initially was worth responding to." Which of them was I inaccurate in pointing out that there was nothing real discussed by them and it was just ignoring the content of people's posts.?

    You conveniently left out the "Sycophant" part of the post I responded to, not suprising. 

    READ

    Nothing, nothing was worth a response, that's my whole point but you decided to respond so just own it

  2. Just now, Sean Mooney said:

    And yet I'm the only one taking direct hits from you. I notice you didn't directly quote them to express your displeasure. It ain't about a thicker skin- my skin is plenty thick- it's about some some dude trying to lay all the issues at my feet. Now maybe you can take your own advice and move the hell on. 

    None of their posts were hypocritical, it's who they are.

    You're not the only one I point out when they are being hypocritical

    What issues are at your feet LOL

    I'm not the one whining like a little bich, no need for me to move on. 

  3. Just now, Sean Mooney said:

    Your argument is stupid. Pure and simple. You are going at the person who was actually on topic and sharing thoughts and excusing the people who just went to insults right away. None of them engaged to the original post until I said something.

    Here's an idea- instead of coming at me solely...how about you apply the whole argument to the other side. I know you want to play message board police but find someone else to do it against. 

     Not excusing anyone including you, HTH

    I'll post how I want to post, ether get thicker skin or move on

  4. 1 minute ago, Sean Mooney said:

    Simple question for you. Which response was looking for me to actively engage in a discussion with it? I'm not getting pissy. I'm calling you out for jumping into something (yet again) and completely ignoring one side of the ledger because it doesn't fit your argument. 

    My argument that your posts were hypocritical?  There's nothing to 'fit', that's what they are.

    Here's an idea, if you don't like the way posters post then don't post like they do.

    You didn't have to respond to them but you did all the while screaming they don't merit a response.  You could have simply responded to those engaging your original post, one I actually thought was very well said but you didn't, you jumped into the cesspool.

  5. Just now, Caine Mutiny said:

    Not “get Trump”. Stand up to Trump. 
     

    And not really Trump either, the movement he represents. If you want to accuse me of MAGA Derangement Syndrome that would be more accurate. Guilty as charged; I believe it’s the most dangerous, most poisonous, most anti-American large political movement in the history of this country, and it must be stopped and eradicated by any peaceful legal means possible. 

    Semantics 

  6. Just now, Sean Mooney said:

    Same thing you always do. Make a big comment, get called, and then immediately try to pass it back.

    Again- you see I made a big sweeping post outlining a lot of thoughts. Which response back was I supposed to engage with? The dancing banana or "Shut the fuk up"? Save your hypocrisy talk 

    What big comment????

    Dude take a break

    If you want to be a hypocrite then be one but don't get all pissy when someone calls you out for it

  7. Just now, Sean Mooney said:

    Seriously dude? This was my first post today on this stuff

    The first response was this which is why I said "Sycophant #1" (and later said a second comment was made by the person after this)

    This was the response of the person I referred to as "Sycophant #2

    This was the response of "Sycophant #3"

    And this was "Sycophant #4"

     

    So save me the fake fooking outrage about me calling people sycophants and mocking that they don't address content of the post and instead fall back on dumb insults and ignoring the topic at hand. 

    LOL you seem triggered, maybe step away for a bit

    There's no fake outrage, there's no outrage, there is simply me pointing out your hypocrisy with the posts I noted

  8. 7 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said:

    Fock off with  your resorting to violence crap. 90% of the violence in the Trump era is by right wing extremists and everybody knows it. As for democracy right now the progressive left are the only ones who seem to care about it at all. 

    Careful, last time you started telling people to fock off you had to find a new username

    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 2
  9. 12 minutes ago, Caine Mutiny said:

    The Governor of Colorado just commuted Tina Peters’ conviction, under pressure by Trump: 

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/colorado-democrats-formally-censure-gov-polis-tina-peters-commutation.amp
     

    This dude, Chuck Schumer, Corey Booker, Hakeem Jeffries, take your pick- always giving in to Trump. So sick of it. I’ve never been a fan of the progressive wing, the AOC-Mamdami wing. Don’t love their ideas. But you know what? I don’t give a sh!t anymore. If they are the only ones willing to fight this despot in the White House then so be it. Let them take over the party. Somebody has to stand up to this idiot. 

    So basically anyone out to get Trump.  We knew this for a long time, it's just nice to see you finally admit it

  10. 11 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

    What content in their post was worth responding to. HT is the only one who said anything that had value to the discussion and it was after his first post. 

    The other three literally added nothing. It's what they do constantly. I've always said that on some instances HT will try to contribute.

    They added just as much as

    Sycophants #1 entered the chat I see

    Sycophants #2 and #3 entered the chat I see

    There is Sycophant #4....

     

     

  11. 31 minutes ago, Fnord said:

    Another good reason to avoid the south, I guess. 

    Over the years while out at bars or clubs I've experienced times when there's a line for the men's pisser but not for the women's. I'm talking about private bathrooms here, one person at a time, not large ones meant for multiple people.

    I've had to pee badly enough that I've used the women's restroom if it's empty and seen plenty of other dudes do the same. If a gal comes along, obviously they get priority seating. I can now get arrested for that in South Carolina? WEAK. What a stupid ass state.

    I'm curious, if the owner/manager of the establishment had a problem with it at the time you were doing it would you take issue with them telling you to stop using the wrong bathroom? 

×
×
  • Create New...