Meglamaniac
-
Posts
9,276 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
11
Posts posted by Meglamaniac
-
-
1 minute ago, thegeneral said:
Now do the methheads of Bumhole, West Virginia. Sadly in this country you can be a big fock up.
I tried to look into the above city but was unable to locate it.
-
2 hours ago, TheNewGirl said:
A friend of mine was telling me about a book she read way back in the 70s called something like “F*ck Taxes” but for the life of me I cannot fine this book.
Basically about how the lay-person can use tax code to their benefit.
Anyone have any insights or recs that are similar?
These may help
- "How to Legally Avoid Paying Taxes" (1970) by Barry Steiner. One of the most famous layman-friendly books of its era, it provided everyday Americans with actionable advice on deductions, exemptions, and income-shifting tactics.
- "The Rape of the Taxpayer" (1973) by Philip M. Stern. Though more of a critical look at the tax system, it was a massive bestseller that exposed the loopholes the wealthy used, giving everyday readers a roadmap of how the code operated.
- "J.K. Lasser's Your Income Tax": Throughout the 1970s, the Lasser Institute published updated, highly practical annual guides designed to be easily read by laymen, full of specific line-by-line instructions and year-specific changes.
- "Sylvia Porter's Money Book" (1975) by Sylvia Porter. This comprehensive personal finance guide included heavily referenced, layman-friendly sections on minimizing income, property, and estate taxes. [1, 2, 3]
-
1
-
2 minutes ago, Fnord said:
I don't know what specific laws you're talking about that are being violated, but that's what law enforcement is for. Otherwise, 1A makes your solution problematic.
OK
-
5 minutes ago, Fnord said:
Based on their religion? Which ones don't belong?
Those that continue to act on religious beliefs that violate current US laws.
-
2 minutes ago, Fnord said:
I'm not sure what post you're talking about; I've never accused you of spreading hate.
This post
"This isn't just about selling daughters. They force women to cover the majority of their body's. They attempt to enact Sharia law wherever they go, including the US. Despite their laws conflicting with our own laws."
-
1 minute ago, Fnord said:
Because these threads are almost always framed as being negative toward an entire population. It's never "look what this POS did!" It's always "look at how all these people are such animals!"
The post I quoted in no way spreads hate, you yourself agreed that that some attempt to install Sharia Law. I'm not going to get into what you think/feel about other threads/posts as I didn't comment on them.
-
1 minute ago, Caine Mutiny said:
But this is ignorant BS too.
No, really it's not, there are multiple examples of people calling for Sharia Law
-
Just now, Fnord said:
Sure. And they've never been successful, so this is all just another way to spread hate.
I'm not sure how speaking the truth is spreading hate
-
22 minutes ago, Fnord said:
Link to locations in the US under Sharia law?
To be fair he said
"They attempt to enact Sharia law wherever they go, including the US."
-
9 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:
Sadly, we have to chalk this up as another transgender mass killing.
This simply can't be true, it can't Tim told us in no uncertain terms these were conservatives and most likely MAGAS
"And because almost all of the irrational hatred against Muslims comes from the right, it also makes sense that they are conservative, perhaps MAGA (since the most virulent anti Muslim rhetoric in this country in recent years has come from MAGA types like Trump, Laura Loomer, Tommy Tuberville, etc.)"
-
7 minutes ago, Fnord said:
I had to google teen takeovers, never heard of them. Unsurprisingly, many of the links were from Fox News. I didn't click on them but did do some more research. What I found was, again unsurprisingly, not quite what you make it out to be.
Basically, these things are put together via viral SM posts. Most of them at least begin as a way for teens to hang out and socialize. This is a good thing! Then, as they go on, much like your average protest, things get squirrelly. Some idiots get in a fight, a few more idiots vandalize property, and then sometimes some uberidiots start shooting. Cops show up to break it up, and the kids doing nothing wrong get thrown in with the troublemakers. This is a bad thing.
I'm in favor of measures that get teens out of the house, off of their devices, and offer a chance to socialize with each other. The old grumps here (of which I am definitely one) I think take for granted that younger folks today don't have nearly the outlets we had for in person socializing, despite their access to information being about a million times more than what we had. Any time you have a big gathering of people, there are going to be folks intent on being disorderly jerks. Cut the kids some slack, prosecute the ones actually committing crimes, and lets figure out positive ways for our young to gather together and enjoy each other's company like we used to.
It's become a huge issue here in Florida, lots of violence, lots of arrests and even loss of life. These things as they currently exists are not good things
-
Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:
Are you willing to tell us who you used to be? The alias thing is so fockin childish.
Gutter has no choice but to post under this alias
-
27 minutes ago, thegeneral said:
You're right
-
1
-
-
Just now, thegeneral said:
Ok
touche
-
2
-
-
4 minutes ago, thegeneral said:
Oh. I didn’t realize this.
Yep, it's pointless to continue, we've both said our peace on the subject
-
1 minute ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:
Things proved in court & real life events available on live video & in photos are not opinions.
OK
-
1
-
-
43 minutes ago, thegeneral said:
Ok then. I guess we are done!
Pretty much what OK means
-
Just now, thegeneral said:
Hundreds of arrested Jan 6ers used that as their defense in court or when interviewed.
Link to hundreds please
-
Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said:
Your emotionalism while posting ‘I know nothing about it’ is definitely a separate issue.
OK
-
1
-
-
Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said:
Really. What do you base this on? Was it the guillotine for the VP or the Shaman in Buffalo headdress who evidenced a higher commitment to Constitutional principle?
It's called an opinion, just because you don't agree with it doesn't mean chit
HTH
-
1 minute ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:
I haven’t followed this, says one local man posting in 24 font & bold Arial.
Keep moving the goalposts buddy, it's making you look really dumb
-
1 minute ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:
You agree they were convicted, yes?
Do you agree their motive was devotion to Trump?
Yes
No
-
1 minute ago, thegeneral said:
I don’t know what people would do but this would be number one story on Fox for weeks and people would understandably be very pissed at how outrageous it is
Instead we get whatabouts, the “I haven’t followed this”, and silence.
You're displaying enough outrage for all of us
-
1 minute ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:
Those people are convicted of breaking the law. That’s not an opinion.
broke the law for him.
100% opinion

kayak fishing
in The Geek Club
Posted
Yes yes but did you do any fishing?