SoloAJ

Where's Laurent Robinson? Give my alma mater some love. It's not like there is a huge plethora of WR talent in Atlanta. Robinson may not be the greatest ever, but I think he can get in the top 20 (or whatever you listed) for Rookie FF coontribution.

Swamp is right. Everyone was gushing over every pick he made until Mike Williams. And I thought it would turn out to be a good move personally becuase there was no guarantee of Rogers/Williams working out, so it was still a need. Too bad it still didn't work. As someone said, if it still isn't shored up, and is still a need, no reason not to take another 1st round WR. Furrey is good and all, but I think we can all agree that WR is still actually a need for Detroit. They have no depth behind Furrey, might as well draft CJ and make Furrey the depth.

I am down 33...Need 34 to win... I have Westbrook left. In our scoring system he has gotten 34 or more twice this year.... I need him to come through big time... 2 TD and 190 combined would do the trick..... Here's to hoping... (Stupid FWP...If I had started Alexander over him, I would only need 4 from Westy).

He was on his heels...understandable since that freight train of Jackson was coming at him.

So starting FWP over SA was a bad move I'm guessing....

Why has Evans done NOTHING but the rest of the... Wow wtf, awesome...a huge TD as I'm writing this... Nevermind...Go team? Seriously, were the Titans shutting him down until this TD or was he not out there or what? I'm happy now..but what was the holdup?

Simply put: My Westbrook+FWP < His LT+Betts Damn

The guy I'm playing has Betts now and LT later... UGH

Well? PPR, 10 yards = 1 point.

AR, Don't worry about the haters. All, You guys are acting a BIT absurd here. I had Colston in my starting lineup until this morning because I washoping he would come back. While I was knowing that I could check it Saturday (unlike AR maybe), I definitely wouldn't have complained to anyone if my internet down. Facct is, saying that his lineup needs to reflect "common sense" is equally absurd. FWP benched for Willis is possible, but I have heard a looooot of groaning from Willis owners who left him on the bench. Romo over Kitna is an udnerstandable one, but hardly one you would change as the commish. Summary: The haters in this thread are jokers.

Again, to me, if Plax didn't care..he wouldnt have just laid on the ground likea weirdo....I think that Plax has it in him to be a great WR...he just hasn't had that moment of clarity yet. I do think it will come eventually...if Eli shapes up.

Plax with the TD. Why the hatin?

JP, I am anything but an Arkansas fan. I simply think it is entirely too broad and sweeping to say that a team that lost by 30 should be inherently excluded from NT talk if appropriate...And in the case of Arkansas, it was without one of the best RBs in the nation and a 3rd string QB (i think?). People can say that doesnt make up 36 points, but it doesn't have to. EVERYTHING changes with every little thing. Butterfly effect is in effect here IMO. Knowing they were going up against USC without their stars...they could have been deflated from the get-go. Note: I'm not saying you think this JP, but many people do. "Well McFadden wouldn't make up 36 points" is a stupid statement to me. For the reasons above. As for me needing things spelled out...I was simply referencing the fact that you said that a 1 loss Ark shouldnt go over a 2loss USC (according to that other guys logic). As I said before, you were comparing apples to oranges. 1 loss Mich > 1 loss ND while I agree that 1 loss USC>1loss Ark.....your scenario involved USC losing to ND too....As I said, it was all hypothetical..but it didn't respond very well to the guys 'theory.' I'm not trying to picka fight by any means. On the contrary I'm trying to engage in discussion. And as I said before, I think your response was ill-placed. While it may be entirely valid as an argument in itself...within the context of that response, it wasn't fitting. 2nd Note: Sorry for my bad keyboard...it makes it really hard to type...especially the spacebar being busted-ish. And for reference: USC>UF>ARK>MICH>ND assuming win-outs for each team. IMO. Also, I thinkthere is plenty of good debate to be had. You jsut have to know what information is pertinent and what isn't. Andobviously less namecalling...Fair enough. Also, I thinkthere is plenty of good debate to be had. You jsut have to know what information is pertinent and what isn't. Andobviously less namecalling...Fair enough.

Quite simply, you are wrong. And beyond that, you're denying what you were trying to imply. Your posts are making very little sense. I suppose telling me to take my head out of my ass is accomplishing something in your mind. However, it is not. Something I think should be the main focus of the OSU/UM rematch idea...is how about the fact that just about everything that could have gone wrong for tOSU that was self inflicted, did go wrong. Two turnovers on snaps? Now, considering all ofthat... Carr got outcoached. Just about anyone on this forum could have coached that UM team to a victory basedon how things went. It was seriously like Carr was TRYING to lose that game by not running Hart up the gut every single play.... I don't think Michigan deserves another chance based a lot on that fact. Carr can not win against tOSU....It will nothappen. And all we will end up with is USC/UF/Ark/ND/whoever saying they deserved a shot. And everyone saying that Michigan is"clearly #2"....Please stop. It is not clear. Before this OSU game, everyone said they were #2 BECAUSE OF their defense....so much for that. Now they're #2 "clearly" because of their offense?

I realize that you're trying to be hgypothetical...but you're being an idiot trying to do so.. Your scenario has USC losing 2 games and Arkansas losing 1 game. That would be they go despite getting spanked by USC. The Michigan/ND scenario he referenced was with each team having one loss. Quit comparing things that aren't comprable. Ugh.