Jump to content

TimHauck

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    17,429

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Posts posted by TimHauck

  1. Posted

    12 minutes ago, nobody said:

    Dumb.  As soon as the infection rate R0 drops below 1, the infection will die off.  You don't need anywhere close to mass vaccination for that to happen.  

    That's how all of us with common sense knew all you jab pushers were full of shìt.  You can't have 35% of your population vaccinated, another 35% having recent previous infection and still see the infection numbers we were seeing.  That was obvious to people with common sense all the while you covidians tried to tell us it was a "pandemic of the unvaccinated."

    Actually June 2021 just before Delta hit  was the lowest cases of the pandemic until 2023.  Further evidence the vaccines were working better before the variants.

    • Haha 1

  2. Posted

    44 minutes ago, Strike said:

    ROFLMAO.  You're very selective in certain things.  You made a big deal about how it was as combination of natural immunity and virus related immunity that helped defeat the disease but now you're acting like it's only the vaccinated who helped defeat the disease.  What percentage of the 1/3 that weren't vaccinated do you figure had natural immunity?    Covid would have petered out a lot quicker than it did had we not shut sh*t down, even without a marginally worthless vaccine. 

    And stop it with all the BS about variants.  You know what one of the traits of virus variants is?  They are almost always much less problematic than the original.  They lose their potency as they mutate.  We probably have 1000's of variants now.  We don't even hear about new variants, and we aren't seeing a resurgence in cases despite the FACT that barely anyone is getting booster shots.

    Where did I say “only the vaccinated helped defeat the disease”?  Hint: I didn’t.

    First of all, in relation to your earlier comment about society “functioning pretty much like it did pre Covid,” that’s referring to the fact that there isn’t much concern about Covid KILLING a significant number of people, thanks to vaccine and natural immunity.  Covid is still out there, but people don’t really report positive tests anymore (nor should they).

    But the response you quoted was in relation to @nobody saying Covid INFECTIONS as a whole should’ve “petered out” if the vaccine was actually 95% effective.  But the fact that many people were both unvaccinated and not previously infected made that even less likely to happen.  Pre-Omicron, I’d estimate around 50% of unvaccinated adults had natural immunity.  Again not including kids.

    Not sure what the point of your ramble about variants is. The Delta variant was one obvious exception to your claim.  And the fact that somewhere around 90% of deaths during the Delta wave were unvaccinated is further proof that a significant number of those without natural immunity were also unvaccinated.

  3. Posted

    6 minutes ago, nobody said:

    So now you're just making up things I didn't say.  What a surprise.

    First you said it “would’ve petered out quickly” (direct quote) if the vaccines were actually 95% effective. 

    Then you said “95% effective should actually mean what? Everyone gets it?”  (direct quote)

     

    Sorry I don’t speak gaslighter 

  4. Posted

    5 minutes ago, nobody said:

    Your making the distinction between 95% of people vs 95% effective by acting like 95% effective should actually mean what?  Everyone still gets it?  Keep that gaslighting going like people weren't told what they were told.

    So no middle ground between “everyone gets it” and “should have petered out quickly”?  Keep that gaslighting going 

  5. Posted

    3 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

    Fortunately, I don’t have time to be here all day like you. I do like the idea of you sitting here all day, waiting for me to reply.

     

    Nice try, you were posting in other threads 

  6. Posted

    11 minutes ago, nobody said:

    I get the difference, but in the end, the numbers shouldn't diverge that much.  

    Diverge that much from what? Your asinine claim that Covid “should have petered out quickly”?  Before the mandates, I believe we only had something like 2/3 of adults vaccinated, obviously not counting kids, not sure what makes you think it should have “petered out quickly.”

    Of course in addition to vaccines being far less effective against Omicron infection, natural immunity was far less effective against Omicron infection as well.  Remember when @lod001 said it was impossible to get reinfected?  He eventually admitted the variants changed that.  What a gaslighter!

    • Thanks 1

  8. Posted

    9 minutes ago, nobody said:

    I'm not reading all that from a known gaslighter, but let me guess.  It's a bunch of words explaining how I didn't see what I saw.

    Well you already displayed twice you don’t know what vaccine effectiveness is, so you don’t know what you saw either

  9. Posted

    2 minutes ago, nobody said:

    I'm sure whatever test they ran spit out a result saying it was 95% effective.  And I have a clear memory of officials claiming that people that get the jab won't get covid.  There were no caveats on variants.  There was no talk of reducing severity.  You won't get it (or at least 95% of people wouldn't get it)... Full stop.

    That's not what happened.  Therefore, those claims were false.  No amount of spin or gaslighting us will change that.  You're a shill for the jab, and you're not trustworthy.

    There were some people that said “you won’t get it,” and they were wrong as I’ve said in the past, because by definition it being 95% effective means you can get  (and again, that doesn’t mean “95% of people won’t get it). Most of the people that said that however were not scientists, such as Biden and Rachel Maddow.  The one possible exception being Walensky, I forget exactly what she said.  Fauci gets lumped in there because he said it like once and was likely taken out of context, but he gave dozens of interviews about it and in pretty much all of them would call out the 95%.  

    And of course as I posted earlier which made @Baker Boy disappear, in addition to the trials, there were multiple real-world studies that also found it ~95% effective (I’m sure you’ll find something wrong with them meanwhile complain if I dispute a fraudulent ivermectin study).  And even with Delta it was still ~60-80% effective, so it wasn’t “waaay” less than 95% until like 6+ months after most people’s initial doses, not 2.

  10. Posted

    1 hour ago, nobody said:

    They love to gaslight.  

    You're absolutely right that this was the narrative.  Now he's splitting hairs about variants, but those were never part of the story originally because of they said, "it's 95% effective today, and it'll be waaaaay less than that in two months," they wouldn't have coerced as many people into getting jabs.

    He also loves the well it was only 95% thing as an out which is another gaslight.  If only 5% of the jabbed could still have gotten it, it would've petered out very quickly.  The jab never prevented shìt.  By the time it got widespread, the variants it may have been effective against were already gone.

     

    So are you denying it was ever 95% effective?

    You don’t understand how vaccine effectiveness is calculated.  To be 95% effective, means you have a 95% less chance of catching it than an unvaccinated (and not previously infected) person.  It doesn’t mean only 5% of vaccinated people will ever catch it.

    • Confused 1

  12. Posted

    24 minutes ago, jonmx said:

    25 percent of Americans are rich?  Typical authoritarian bastard point.  We are only going after 25 percent of the population!  You bastards love your slavery. 

    Honestly 25% having ANY is less than I would have guessed. How many of that 25% has like $1000 or less of it?

  13. Posted

    It will be interesting to see how much the “manifesto” is considered as evidence.  Apparently Ye specifically wrote “this is fiction” at the beginning. Sounds like there is other evidence that they were potentially planning to kill people, but I feel like someone being charged because of a “fictional work” is something @jonmx would consider to be part of the government’s plot to control us all or whatever nonsense he usually spouts

  15. Posted

    On 4/2/2024 at 3:20 PM, jonmx said:

    If you think the 80,000 new IRS agents will be going after the rich, you are mistaken.  75,000 will be going over the crypto exchanges with a fine tooth comb. 

    Doesn’t “the rich” hold most of the crypto?

  17. Posted

    On 7/30/2017 at 12:54 AM, WhiteWonder said:

     

    i can probably only think of one of their songs although I do personally know their manager (or former manager not sure) and they are from Jersey i believe.

     

    Some of 'the Used', some 'Simple Plan', most all Fallout Boy, 'Something Corporate' which became 'Jacks Mannequin' which is very light and relaxing music actually.... and the singer went solo a year or two ago with a song you probably heard a lot on the radio

     

     

     

     

    but mostly it was a song or two here and there from various bands.

     

    For the most part thats how I choose my music. Songs more so than groups/artists. Very few groups/artists that I am die hard loyal to.

    Something Corporate is back together and touring

  21. Posted

    12 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

    Again, spreading your fake BS. 

    I live and travel the deep South. It's EXTREMELY RARE to see a Confederate Flag anywhere unless it's a museum or historical site such as a Civil War Battlefield, etc. 

    It's not uncommon to see Trump Flags. But they are NEVER accompanied with a Confederate flag. NEVER!!!! 

    So can you please stop lying and pushing your false narratives? 

    Lol, see what I mean @TheNewGirl?  GC righties denying the obvious, even Confederate flags at all.  I’m not saying that combo is everywhere, but you should see at least one on a 15 minute drive around most rural areas.

  23. Posted

    11 hours ago, TheNewGirl said:

    Meh. I don't really care much about flags, bumper stickers, whatever. If that's how these folks want to spread their love/hate, that's cool. 

    Either way, it doesn't have any effect on my day if I don't let it. 

    Agree, my main issue is people like @Baker Boy denying they’ve ever seen a house with both a Confederate flag and a Trump flag despite claiming to live in a red state.  It’s weird to deny something so blatantly obvious, reminds me of how @RLLD keeps saying the current economy is “the worst economy the lower classes have seen in their lifetime” which is so wrong it’s laughable.

  25. Posted

    35 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

    Remember when they said you couldn't spread Covid if you were vaxxed, then shamed and banned the unvaxxed from working, going anywhere or even working. 

    Ohhhh good times eh Timmay?  

    Yeah we were basically just talking about that dummy, as anyone saying “you couldn’t spread it” was likely based on the incorrect belief that you couldn’t get it in the first place.  But anyone saying those things was wrong as I’ve called out in the past, the trials showed it was 95% effective against infection so it was always possible to get (and spread) it.  Before Delta, that number was pretty accurate, and really only went down slightly with Delta.

    Oh, they banned people from working or even working?  I was always against the mandates anyway, but there has been data show that the workplace mandates saved the most lives of any measure that was taken.  Also, being “banned from going anywhere” is an extreme exaggeration, but I know you know that.

×