Camisado 0 Posted July 24, 2006 I have been offerd carnell williams and ronnie brown for ladanian tomlinson i alredy have warrick dunn would you do this deal? the scoring is basic Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCNickNasty 0 Posted July 24, 2006 you are basically giving up 2 first round picks, although late in the 1st, for LT. If you want LT bad enough do it, but I wouldn't be mad at having those 2 along with dunn for insurance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
unckeyherb 2 Posted July 24, 2006 you are basically giving up 2 first round picks, although late in the 1st, for LT. If you want LT bad enough do it, but I wouldn't be mad at having those 2 along with dunn for insurance. maybe I'm nuts, but are n't you giving up LT for two first round picks? If this is a competetive keeper league I would say do it. Those two should be money for a long time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RamslovaMartzhata 3 Posted July 24, 2006 Wrong bored, no rules given as far as keepers go.. but yes, I'd do it in most circumstacnes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Raider 84 29 Posted July 24, 2006 Id do it for sure if it's a keeper league. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Force of Two 0 Posted July 24, 2006 I would probably take it the Help Board... Your one freebie...I would do that deal in a heartbeat Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Parja 0 Posted July 24, 2006 Assuming you can start 2 RBs, I'd do it. you are basically giving up 2 first round picks, although late in the 1st, for LT. If you want LT bad enough do it, but I wouldn't be mad at having those 2 along with dunn for insurance. Why does this happen EVERY time there's a question like this? R>C>P Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
illmadden 0 Posted July 24, 2006 It depends on who you have for your #2 RB and depth in your bench. Because my expectations of LT is much higher than those of Cadillac and Brown. I'm expecting another 20 TD year from LT. From Cadillac and Brown, 10-15 TD's apiece. My question is, why would you fill two slots when there's a possiblity of LT gaining that same amount by himself? For example, I have LT and S-Jax. Why would I trade LT for Cadillac and Brown and have to be forced to sit Jackson down? If it's a keeper league, then I would make the trade because of the upside the two have. But re-draft league, I wouldn't... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akaoni 0 Posted July 24, 2006 It depends on who you have for your #2 RB and depth in your bench. Because my expectations of LT is much higher than those of Cadillac and Brown. I'm expecting another 20 TD year from LT. From Cadillac and Brown, 10-15 TD's apiece. My question is, why would you fill two slots when there's a possiblity of LT gaining that same amount by himself? For example, I have LT and S-Jax. Why would I trade LT for Cadillac and Brown and have to be forced to sit Jackson down? If it's a keeper league, then I would make the trade because of the upside the two have. But re-draft league, I wouldn't... He already said that he had Dunn as a 2nd back, and as such, I would think that trading LT for the Auburn teammates would be a "Dunn deal." Sorry I couldn't resist... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Parja 0 Posted July 24, 2006 It depends on who you have for your #2 RB and depth in your bench. Because my expectations of LT is much higher than those of Cadillac and Brown. I'm expecting another 20 TD year from LT. From Cadillac and Brown, 10-15 TD's apiece. My question is, why would you fill two slots when there's a possiblity of LT gaining that same amount by himself? For example, I have LT and S-Jax. Why would I trade LT for Cadillac and Brown and have to be forced to sit Jackson down? If it's a keeper league, then I would make the trade because of the upside the two have. But re-draft league, I wouldn't... Dunn is his #2. You learn so much when you read the WHOLE post. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
illmadden 0 Posted July 24, 2006 Dunn is his #2. You learn so much when you read the WHOLE post. Yes, and if YOU would notice...I also state "depth in his bench." I mean, he might favor dunn over backs i would consider better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyeaser 3 Posted July 24, 2006 hell yeah do it.. i would have already done it......worst case you can still trade dunn later if you need to , or if you use a flex in your league, i would love to have them 3....this is crazy IMO not even close... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joecat 0 Posted July 24, 2006 If it's a redraft, do it then trade dunn away if you need wr help. It would help to see your whole team. If its a keeper it should be dunn already!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
anty63 0 Posted July 25, 2006 You would be an idiot if you didn't take that trade. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lukinman 0 Posted July 25, 2006 without a doubt smart move something scares me with lt having rogers as a qb this year..if rogers dont perform, its gonna be a tough year for lt..box will be stacked Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
t.j 35 Posted July 25, 2006 without a doubt smart move something scares me with lt having rogers as a qb this year..if rogers dont perform, its gonna be a tough year for lt..box will be stacked It's Rivers. And Rivers won't hold back LT. He's had two years of offseason, training camps, and learning from the sideline to help him pick up the NFL game. He'll do fine, and the Chargers will lean on LT while Rivers gets the hang of applying his knowledge on the field. That said, Caddy and Ronnie is nice compensation. All it takes is an LT injury and this trade takes you from the poorhouse to the penthouse. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
