larrymcirish 0 Posted August 30, 2006 this is not a "rate my team" or "i need help". rather, it is a continuation of the ongoing debate on draft order. i'm in a 14 team, non-ppr, redraft w. standard scoring league. lack of quality running backs led to my strategy. here is what i got. is this strategy as good as any? 1.6 ronnie brown 2.9 warrick dunn 3.6 chester taylor 4.9 donald driver 5.6 rod smith 6.9 lee evans 7.6 steve mcnair 8.9 kevin barlow 9.6 reggie brown (draft was before stallworth trade) 10.9 byron leftwich 11.6 ben troupe 12.9 dolphins d 13.6 josh brown 14.9 alex smith te 15.6 chiefs d 16.9 jason hanson Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
djrockstar 0 Posted August 30, 2006 I wouldn't get too caught up in positional drafting. Try value/value/value/value/value/value/QB. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NatronIsMean 0 Posted August 30, 2006 I wouldn't get too caught up in positional drafting. Try value/value/value/value/value/value/QB. DJ is dead right - you change your strategy based on the runs that are going and your needs. Early on, you try to go against the runs of everyone else, unless you are getting who you want anyway. Based on pressing need (you've been waiting on your RB2 or RB3, you just go for the guy you need regardless of runs. Go for value/tiers until forced to cover your needs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Riddlen 1 Posted August 30, 2006 positional drafting id garbage. You have to read trends and estimate DP as the draft is in progress Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
uubeee 0 Posted August 30, 2006 I wouldn't get too caught up in positional drafting. Try value/value/value/value/value/value/QB. Never drafted based on position. Draft based on what falls to you and when. What you need and the scoring system you live under. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mtammen 0 Posted August 30, 2006 I wouldn't get too caught up in positional drafting. Try value/value/value/value/value/value/QB. The problem with this thinking is it could lead to WR/WR in the first round if you are at the bottom. The key is a mix of both. Say round 1 and 2 and easy as you go RB/RB, but in round 3 and 4, you can say, I really want to go RB/WR, but if Randy Moss falls to me I will go WR/WR. It's about value as well as positional. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scottlaroc 0 Posted August 30, 2006 I wouldn't get too caught up in positional drafting. Try value/value/value/value/value/value/QB. best avail/ best avail/ best avail/ best avail/ all while keeping your starting position limits in mind. Only because this is a messed up year! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
barber2300 0 Posted August 30, 2006 Never drafted based on position. Draft based on what falls to you and when. What you need and the scoring system you live under. Exactly. I went into my draft thinking I was going RB, WR, RB, RB, but when Randy Moss fell to me in the 3rd round, 9th pick I had to take him. I still ended up getting Chester Taylor in the early 4th. You have to adjust to your draft. 1 (9) Lamont Jordan 2 (16) Chad Johnson 3 (33) Randy Moss 4 (40) Chester Taylor 5 (57) Thomas Jones 6 (64) Joe Horn 7 (81) Ahman Green 8 (88) Kurt Warner 9 (105) Keyshawn Johnson 10 (112) Michael Vick 11 (129) Chris Brown 12 (136) Braylan Edwards 13 (153) Brett Favre 14 (160) Ben Troupe 15 (177) Alex Smith (TE) 16 (184) Dolphins D (3 more spots left to pick off of free agency - 1 kicker and 2 bench spots) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites