nos23 1 Posted August 30, 2006 who will have the better season between these two? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JREarly 0 Posted August 30, 2006 mike clayton? i am not familiar with. maybe i am just a little bit slow. stallworth will be the #1 in Philly. so take him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nos23 1 Posted August 30, 2006 michael clayton from the bucs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PackYourNut 47 Posted August 30, 2006 Mark Clayton from the Ravens will outperform those two... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
adanley 1 Posted August 30, 2006 As long as Galloway is healthy, I'd stay away from Clayton. Galloway looks as good as ever. Not sure how Stallworth is going to do as he doesn't have a great history, but I think he could easily repeat last years numbers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IronFistIFFL 0 Posted August 30, 2006 As long as Galloway is healthy, I'd stay away from Clayton. Galloway looks as good as ever. Not sure how Stallworth is going to do as he doesn't have a great history, but I think he could easily repeat last years numbers. .... said the galloway owner. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nos23 1 Posted August 30, 2006 said the galloway owner. well said. clayton in my eyes has way more talent than galloway. Everyone is writting him off because of last years sats. Lets not forget his rookie season and that he was rated in the top 10 to start off last year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
adanley 1 Posted August 30, 2006 Funny that I've never had Galloway before and had Clayton the last two years. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kellys Heroes 0 Posted August 30, 2006 The Bucs and Jagurs game was on last week... Both galloway and Clayton looked good.. I noticed how fast Clayton seemed again.. He was injured last yr so I would try my luck and Take him between 8 and 10.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GrassyKnollSniper 0 Posted August 30, 2006 who will have the better season between these two? Ask yourself this question. Will the #1 receiver on a team that will throw 60% of the time be more productive than the 2nd receiver on a team that will throw 40% of the time? There`s your answer! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
adanley 1 Posted August 30, 2006 Ask yourself this question. Will the #1 receiver on a team that will throw 60% of the time be more productive than the 2nd receiver on a team that will throw 40% of the time? There`s your answer! Exactly. Why should my opinion matter less because I have Galloway and Stallworth. I backed up my talk. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IronFistIFFL 0 Posted August 30, 2006 Exactly. Why should my opinion matter less because I have Galloway and Stallworth. I backed up my talk. sub-jec-tive [suhb-jek-tiv] - placing excessive emphasis on one's own moods, attitudes, opinions, etc.; unduly egocentric. ob-jec-tive [uhb-jek-tiv] - not influenced by personal feelings, interpretations, or prejudice; based on facts Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
adanley 1 Posted August 30, 2006 sub-jec-tive [suhb-jek-tiv] - placing excessive emphasis on one's own moods, attitudes, opinions, etc.; unduly egocentric. ob-jec-tive [uhb-jek-tiv] - not influenced by personal feelings, interpretations, or prejudice; based on facts I guess that hiding the fact that you have a vested interest in a certain player makes you objective. I'm sure that none of the other posters have any of these players either. I'm just being honest from personal experience, as I have had Clayton the last two years. Look what happened to Claytons stats the games Galloway played. Look for yourself. I have yet to see many objective posts in regards to players on this bored. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yowza 0 Posted August 30, 2006 Let me see... Third year WR that is with the same team, who went bonkers his rookie year, was hurt most of last year. OR Conistantly nicked WR on a new team who has never really met expectations. Plus, who says #2 WRs on ateam never outperform #1s on other teams. The 60-40 "rule" above makes absolutely no sense. Oh yeah, I am a Michael Clayton owner. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GrassyKnollSniper 0 Posted August 30, 2006 I guess that hiding the fact that you have a vested interest in a certain player makes you objective. I'm sure that none of the other posters have any of these players either. I'm just being honest from personal experience, as I have had Clayton the last two years. Look what happened to Claytons stats the games Galloway played. Look for yourself. I have yet to see many objective posts in regards to players on this bored. My two leagues haven`t drafted yet. I own no players at this time. Does that make me objective? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
