theplaymaker 0 Posted September 10, 2006 Pro football is like nuclear warfare. There are no winners, only survivors. ~Frank Gifford Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
J5 0 Posted September 10, 2006 Alright I have 3 questions all for different leagues. Start Kitna or Brooks: The Lions play a better defense but Martz should call for the pass alot. Brooks has not been very consistent but SD does not have much of a passing defense and he has Moss under the Monday night lights. This one has me changing my mind alot. Start T. Jones or Foster: Who would you go with here? Jones may lose carries to Benson and their qb is bad. They are also on the road. Foster is getting a revamped ATL defense and does not have Smith to keep the defense honest Start Mason or Henry: I was going to start Housh but it looks like he may not play. Henry has a great opportunity but also gets Surtain whose coverage he may not be used to and the Bengals may spread the ball around. Mason is the #1 but plays against TB and McNair while familiar with Mason may take some time to get it together in Baltimore. My opponent also has Palmer. This wr would be my #3 with Holt and Chambers. Chambers only got me 5 points. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theplaymaker 0 Posted September 10, 2006 Alright I have 3 questions all for different leagues. Start Kitna or Brooks: The Lions play a better defense but Martz should call for the pass alot. Brooks has not been very consistent but SD does not have much of a passing defense and he has Moss under the Monday night lights. This one has me changing my mind alot. Start T. Jones or Foster: Who would you go with here? Jones may lose carries to Benson and their qb is bad. They are also on the road. Foster is getting a revamped ATL defense and does not have Smith to keep the defense honest Start Mason or Henry: I was going to start Housh but it looks like he may not play. Henry has a great opportunity but also gets Surtain whose coverage he may not be used to and the Bengals may spread the ball around. Mason is the #1 but plays against TB and McNair while familiar with Mason may take some time to get it together in Baltimore. My opponent also has Palmer. This wr would be my #3 with Holt and Chambers. Chambers only got me 5 points. My mantra is when in doubt, play your best guys. Kitna certainly has a better outlook than Brooks. Right now you know Kitna is the better start. Sure Moss plays well on Monday night and maybe you think the SD defense is suspect but be carefull about basing Brooks outlook on Moss, mainly because you have Brooks and not Moss. Besides Moss scored against San Diego only once, and that was three years ago. San Diego will romp and Moss is liable to sulk on the sidelines, or disappear in the game as it gets out of reach. As far as WR, I like Mason. Remember when Mason was a stud? He was playing in TEN with McNair throwing to him. He was his go to guy then and he is going to be his go to guy now. Read the play by plays of the preseason games and add up all the incomplete passes with the complete passes and get how many times the QB was going to a guy. Mason got most of the third down looks and most importantly the red zone looks. It's like Starsky & Hutch back together again, kickin butt and takin' names. nah, but seriously, Mason has great upside this season, I like him more than most people but you can't denty the chemistry is right for a good season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BIGPLAYER06 0 Posted September 10, 2006 http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.p...howtopic=230636 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theplaymaker 0 Posted September 10, 2006 “Football is an incredible game. Sometimes it's so incredible, it's unbelievable.” Tom landrey Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
whatadai 0 Posted September 10, 2006 T.J. Houshmandzadeh or Antonio Bryant? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theplaymaker 0 Posted September 10, 2006 T.J. Houshmandzadeh or Antonio Bryant? I like Bryant this year. he has tons of upside and has shown flashes of what he is capable of in Dallas and Cleveland. he has built a good repoire with Alex Smith and they play Arizona this week, hardly a team that instills fear. having said that, I would go with Housh. Bryant has a lot of positives going for him but the bottom line is that he is playing in SF. Nobody in SF was very useful for fantasy football, that's how bad they were. He's got a new QB throwing to him and they haven't played a down of real live NFL football which is similar to guruella warefare on amphetimines. Housh will likely be the main guy as Smith hasn't practiced all week. Even if he does play, he will probably be limited so Housh should be the guy getting the looks. Hey, I like Bryant. I drafted him too. Hopefully he will payoff for us but he could also bomb miserably as well so best to wait if you have a proven WR on a team with a solid passing game. for me I'm starting him because my other option would be Brew Bennett and the QB situation over there is a mess. I'm thinking about dropping him for Eric Moulds. If I did that, I would start Moulds and if I did that I would play moulds over Bryant. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
P Park Pimps 1 Posted September 10, 2006 If Housh sits, who should I fill in for him, Laverneus Coles, Matt Jones, or Braylon Edwards??? Or should I drop Edwards for Chris Henry??? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
