Which Trade.

[NebraskaRRT 0]

16 team start qb, rb, wr, wr, te, flex, k, d

 

 

Just having a tough time figuring out what deal would be the best for my team going forward. Not sure if he would take cotchery..it might take evans. I like evans.

 

So doing trade 1....

 

McNair

LJ, Gore, Buck, Morris, MJD, Jacobs

Boldin, Holt, Evans, Cotchery

Gates

 

Trade 2,.....Lamont or Bryant would be flex

 

McNair

LJ, Lamont, Buck, morris, MJD, Duece

Boldin, Holt, Bryant, Cotchery or Evans

Gates

 

I just feel that Gore will continue to put up monster numbers. I cant resist getting 2 elite wr on my team for starters. Either way for a 16 team i would be in great position...minus the QB position. Working on fixing that. Sad to say I am 2-2 (double header in week 2). Had second in points in week 1..faced #1 in points. Bye week with LJ and Gates out hit my team hard.

 

After looking at thinks Deal 2 looks better...I think....

[NebraskaRRT 0]

Decision is split so far..

[ramblin'wreck 0]

I personally like trade 2 better. THis way you have a WR insurance in Bryant. With Losman at QB, I am not so sure about Evans.

 

 

THanks for helping with mine.

[ZUL8TER 0]

I like #2

[Gost8 0]

#2

[NebraskaRRT 0]

I see some #2...why? Anyone else?

[NebraskaRRT 0]

Please say why?

[Stopper 0]

#2. Lamont is a dog right now, but if the Raiders get their sh!t together, he'll be ok.

[bobpate17 0]

aight here is why I voted for first trade. Gore has been good so far. he can start #2. he will be better than duce and L. Jordan. on the other hand u loose bryant and gain holt. u r not loosing any thing from your starting lineup in trade 1. second trade means taking risk. why take risk if u don't need to.

[mike06 0]

id have to go with #2

[kcBlitzkrieg 29]

aight here is why I voted for first trade. Gore has been good so far. he can start #2. he will be better than duce and L. Jordan. on the other hand u loose bryant and gain holt. u r not loosing any thing from your starting lineup in trade 1. second trade means taking risk. why take risk if u don't need to.

 

 

I guess Im in the minority here but I agree with the above...there is no reason to take the risk here with Lamont, who you have no idea what kind of production to expect out of him...and if and when he does start to produce its not going to be on a consistent basis. I you stick with trade #1 you are going to lose some depth at wideout but you are going to have 2 stud WRs along with 2 top producing backs, plus Jacobs' potential down the line. Gore is much more valuable and will produce consistently for you over Duece or Jordan. Id go with the first.