Bert 1,128 Posted November 20, 2006 those 25 and under are involved a disproportionately large number of hunting accidents. also hunting and driving have nothing to do with eachother. go hunting with someone under 25. go driving with someone under 25. go sky diving with someone under 25. what's your point ? so, like I said. Please expain to me why it's a crappy stat. I'm ready to listen. those 25 and under are involved in a disproportionately large number of auto accidents. those 25 and under are involved in a disproportionately large number of boating accidents. those 25 and under are involved in a disproportionately large number of sking accidents. and I would bet those 25 and under are involved in a disproportionately large number of sky diving accidents. My point is take any activity and those 25 and younger are going to have disproportionately more accidents. It's not about the activity it is about age. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TD Ryan2 316 Posted November 20, 2006 My point is take any activity and those 25 and younger are going to have disproportionately more accidents. It's not about the activity it is about age. fair enough... the 25 and under crowd have more accidents in all activities... but considering that "hunting accident" is generally defined as "getting shot", I'd say the activity does matter. go play softball with 'em. go play darts with 'em. think twice if you're gonna' skydive or go hunting with 'em. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DuckStupid 40 Posted November 20, 2006 fair enough... the 25 and under crowd have more accidents in all activities... but considering that "hunting accident" is generally defined as "getting shot", I'd say the activity does matter. go play softball with 'em. go play darts with 'em. think twice if you're gonna' skydive or go hunting with 'em. Yeah, and never play russian roulette with them, fockers always seem to lose. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites