piece of work 0 Posted April 30, 2007 Wow......It really looks like they have filled alot of holes. I am a cowboy fan so this doesnt excite me but they really look like they are on the up and up. I believe they gave up nexts yrs #1 pick for the OT staley late first. This must mean they feel like they will finish pretty good next yr. And most importantly protecting a smith and blocking for gore. Pat Willis......wow ...... and being coached by singletary..... both are high character guys with mean streaks on the field....they are clones of one another.... great pick and fit. This team is well coached (two yrs ago they sucked but played very hard for coach nolan) never gave up, they are young, and also have tons of raw talent. Oh yeah...... they got DJAX.........HUGE move they needed for a vet wr......possession asmith can depend on . And last.... Vernon Davis has flown under the radar..... he will be a monster this year. Get ready folks.....it is hard for me to say but SAN FRAN is here to stay for a long time........ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
swamp dog 0 Posted April 30, 2007 well, the pats are the most improved team (if that's possible for them) but i like what the 49ers have done and are doing a lot. they appear to be the new, emerging power in the west. might be 1 year away yet...but could very well win that division outright this year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TD Ryan2 316 Posted April 30, 2007 SF has had a great off season. but also, they had the most cap-space to play with so there's no excuse for NOT having a good off season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Parja 0 Posted April 30, 2007 Wow......It really looks like they have filled alot of holes. Typically not how you want to start a discussion in favor of a team from San Francisco, but I digress. Yes, they've had a pretty impressive offseason and draft. Probably 2nd most improved overall. The "Most Improved Team...Period" title is currently held by New England. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
piece of work 0 Posted April 30, 2007 well, the pats are the most improved team (if that's possible for them) but i like what the 49ers have done and are doing a lot. they appear to be the new, emerging power in the west. might be 1 year away yet...but could very well win that division outright this year. cant argue with you dog.....ne has gotten alot better. I could see san fran going 10-6 a very good possibility. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted April 30, 2007 They have had fantastic offseason. But perception is not always reality (look at Arizona). Don't mean to piss in your cheerios but the niners have to do it on the field. Being a paper tiger means nothing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Parja 0 Posted April 30, 2007 They have had fantastic offseason. But perception is not always reality (look at Arizona). Don't mean to piss in your cheerios but the niners have to do it on the field. Being a paper tiger means nothing. This is true. Should definitely be an interesting season for the NFC West. At least on paper, those teams are all looking to be pretty evenly matched. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
football_scooter 0 Posted April 30, 2007 They have had fantastic offseason. But perception is not always reality (look at Arizona). Don't mean to piss in your cheerios but the niners have to do it on the field. Being a paper tiger means nothing. Right - because beating Denver at home last year and knocking them out of the playoffs, as well as sweeping Seattle last year were "on paper" in your mind. These unsupported snipes are just retarded. At least have some logic to your bashing Hawker - this crap is played. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Demon 0 Posted April 30, 2007 San Francisco = most overhyped team for next year The loss of Norv Turner is going to hurt more than San Fran homers want to admit. I see Alex Smith regressing and costing the team a chance at the playoffs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted April 30, 2007 Right - because beating Denver at home last year and knocking them out of the playoffs, as well as sweeping Seattle last year were "on paper" in your mind. These unsupported snipes are just retarded. At least have some logic to your bashing Hawker - this crap is played. Did the niners make the playoffs last year? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
piece of work 0 Posted April 30, 2007 Right - because beating Denver at home last year and knocking them out of the playoffs, as well as sweeping Seattle last year were "on paper" in your mind. These unsupported snipes are just retarded. At least have some logic to your bashing Hawker - this crap is played. totally agree.................. For some reason Nolan and his staff of singletary etc get this team to play well over there head..... ex at den, sweep sea. Now that they have some talented vets and new blood coming in I can see them getting back to there old winning form. They will be ready next year............. trust me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
swamp dog 0 Posted April 30, 2007 Right - because beating Denver at home last year and knocking them out of the playoffs, as well as sweeping Seattle last year were "on paper" in your mind. These unsupported snipes are just retarded. At least have some logic to your bashing Hawker - this crap is played. see, you do this all of the time. no need to fly off the handle. everyone in this thread is giving props to the 49ers. and the poster you're attacking is giving props to the 49ers offseason. saying the 49ers still have to do it on the field and prove it isn't "retarded" nor should it cause you to fly into a homeristic rage. chill. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted April 30, 2007 totally agree.................. For some reason Nolan and his staff of singletary etc get this team to play well over there head..... ex at den, sweep sea. Now that they have some talented vets and new blood coming in I can see them getting back to there old winning form. They will be ready next year............. trust me. Have they achieved their old winning ways yet? The answer is no. That's why I said do it on the field first. If that rains on few niner parades oh well. I have been hearing for the past three years how Arizona was ready to take off and guess what? Every year they still suck. I want to see the niners do it on the field. I don't care that they beat a Denver team with a rookie QB at the helm or the fact that they swept Seattle (without a healthy Hass or SA). Do it on the field and then talk all you want. Unitl then, you're a paper tiger. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 6,580 Posted April 30, 2007 Wait till they don't make the playoffs and have no 1st round pick next year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted April 30, 2007 see, you do this all of the time. no need to fly off the handle. everyone in this thread is giving props to the 49ers. and the poster you're attacking is giving props to the 49ers offseason. saying the 49ers still have to do it on the field and prove it isn't "retarded" nor should it cause you to fly into a homeristic rage. chill. Exactly. All I said was yes they have had a stupendous offseason. Yet until you go out on the field and actually win , it's all talk. No reason to go postal IMO. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Belushi 9 Posted April 30, 2007 I look for them to win their division this year. I wasn't that impressed earlier in the off-season, although they did some nice things to fill some holes. But the offence looked like a mess with no WR's and another new offensive co-ordinator. But now with DJax there early in the off-season, I think it's a huge boost for the team. While Lelie and Battle won't scare anyone, having DJax and possibly Davis should make defences respect the passing game and open things up. Let's face it, the defences in their division isn't that great. So the offence should be respectable. And the defence looks better, although considering last year it couldn't have been much worse. The Seahawks have taken a step back this year. St. Louis has a great offence but no defence. Should be a great battle for the division, but I think the 49ers have a real shot at winning their division. Allot hinges on how Alex Smith does this year though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Laurence Maroney's Nuts 2 Posted April 30, 2007 see, you do this all of the time. no need to fly off the handle. everyone in this thread is giving props to the 49ers. and the poster you're attacking is giving props to the 49ers offseason. saying the 49ers still have to do it on the field and prove it isn't "retarded" nor should it cause you to fly into a homeristic rage. chill. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Foghorn Leghorn 0 Posted April 30, 2007 As a Niner fan, I'm absolutely ecstatic with what they've done this offseason. Patrick Willis will be the anchor of their defence for years to come. Giving up next year's first rounder for Staley, while a bit pricey, and getting Jackson for very little will help in trying to get Alex Smith to that all important "next level". That being said, I'm of the opinion that they are still one year away from winning the division, for the following reasons: -There are a lot of new faces around, and they will need some time to gel and learn systems different to what they're used to. -Seattle, while not improving dramatically, is still the best team to beat on paper and look to be healthy going into 2007. I think Hasselbeck, Alexander, Branch, Hackett, et al. take one more run at the NFC Championship before breaking up. Can the Niners win the division? Sure. But I think a more likely scenario is that they challenge for (and get) a wild card this year, and win the division in 2008. Of course, it definitely will be fun to be a Niner fan in 2007! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
piece of work 0 Posted April 30, 2007 Like I said I am not a sanfran fan but with zero wr's last yr and a mediocre/bad def they played really well ON THE FIELD......with the new players coming in and vdavis/gore/asmith another yr under there belt they will be good.... possibly 10-6. I wouldnt say they are paper champs........They are on the verge of really making some noise. By the way arizona had a much worse team going into last yr with kwarner..... never bought that hype..... Sorry some of you did????????? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
football_scooter 0 Posted April 30, 2007 San Francisco = most overhyped team for next year The loss of Norv Turner is going to hurt more than San Fran homers want to admit. I see Alex Smith regressing and costing the team a chance at the playoffs. And of course you don't bother supporting these retarded contentions in the slightest - better to simply not say anything rather than come in saying something stupid without trying to make a case for it. Fact: the system Turner installed isn't changing in the slightest since they promoted from within. Oops - there goes the only semblance of a point you might have had. Wait till they don't make the playoffs and have no 1st round pick next year. See - this is the retardation of which I speak. Pay attention to the NFL please. The Niners got that 1st rounder back from Indy. I swear, one day edjr will talk out of his mouth instead of his ass and we'll all die of shock. oh, that's pwnd by the way. Exactly. All I said was yes they have had a stupendous offseason. Yet until you go out on the field and actually win , it's all talk. No reason to go postal IMO. All I asked for was that for a change you support your contentions. Obviously you're a Seahawks fan, and your history is to bash the Niners. You think I haven't noticed that or something? That you get a clean slate with every topic you try to snipe? Save your praise since you can't stop yourself from bashing - neither is interesting because without supporting commentary you lack credibility to any of your comments, better or worse. but that's ok - mischaracterize my asking for supporting data as "going postal" - tactics of a weak mind. Maybe instead you should just say WHY you think something bad about the Niners instead of expecting people to take your assertions as gospel. That way you won't get pwnd as much. Like I said I am not a sanfran fan but with zero wr's last yr and a mediocre/bad def they played really well ON THE FIELD......with the new players coming in and vdavis/gore/asmith another yr under there belt they will be good.... possibly 10-6. I wouldnt say they are paper champs........They are on the verge of really making some noise. By the way arizona had a much worse team going into last yr with kwarner..... never bought that hype..... Sorry some of you did????????? Outstanding post. This is exactly what I meant - I think "paper tiger" is a ridiculous contention. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgcrawfish 232 Posted April 30, 2007 Typically not how you want to start a discussion in favor of a team from San Francisco, but I digress. Yes, they've had a pretty impressive offseason and draft. Probably 2nd most improved overall. The "Most Improved Team...Period" title is currently held by New England. I'm going to allow for New England improving their talent base, there is no doubt there. But crowning the Pats already is a bit premature. They brought in two of the more selfish receivers in recent history in Moss and Stallworth, both with a tendency to take off plays in which they aren't the primary target. The "i only act like a crybaby jackass when I'm losing" excuse is the Moss M.O. The Redskins are infamous for bringing in high priced hired-guns and looking great on paper, but never meshing on the field. To quote a very wise man..."They are who we thought they were. The Pats are who we thought they were. That's why we took the damn field. If you wanna crown 'em then crown their ass." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,058 Posted April 30, 2007 I'd argue that the Pats have improved more, but no question San Fran has taken big steps and should win that division this year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GeminiV 0 Posted April 30, 2007 Wait till they don't make the playoffs and have no 1st round pick next year. They have Indy's first round pick next year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted April 30, 2007 All I asked for was that for a change you support your contentions. Obviously you're a Seahawks fan, and your history is to bash the Niners. You think I haven't noticed that or something? That you get a clean slate with every topic you try to snipe? Save your praise since you can't stop yourself from bashing - neither is interesting because without supporting commentary you lack credibility to any of your comments, better or worse. but that's ok - mischaracterize my asking for supporting data as "going postal" - tactics of a weak mind. Maybe instead you should just say WHY you think something bad about the Niners instead of expecting people to take your assertions as gospel. That way you won't get pwnd as much. Outstanding post. This is exactly what I meant - I think "paper tiger" is a ridiculous contention. Hmmm where to start with this? I didn't realize that saying a team had to win on the field first before crowning their asses is bashing but if it makes you feel better--here's your for a great offseason. The Niners win!!!!! Supporting commentary? You mean like the 'Zona example I used to show how a team gets crowned every offseason and then shites the bed every regular season? Not enough commentary for ya? Ok when was the last time the niners did anything (besides beating the Seahawks last year as obviously that was your SB)? Why do I not think the niners are ready for prime time? First, I don't belive in Alex Smith. I know you checked him into the HOF after the first quarter of last year's first preseason game against the Bears but the guy has not impressed me and this year he has no excuses if he doesnt; get the job done. I could give a shite whether you like or dislike my assertions. The bottom line is despite a great offseason, the niners have done NOTHING on the field. Until they clinch the division or a wild card berth they are nothing more then paper tigers or the Zona Cardinals with the for a great offseason. have a great day Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jesus Christ 0 Posted April 30, 2007 cant argue with you dog.....ne has gotten alot better. I could see san fran going 10-6 a very good possibility. I hope not the Pats have their 1st round pick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
football_scooter 0 Posted April 30, 2007 The bottom line is despite a great offseason, the niners have done NOTHING on the field. Until they clinch the division or a wild card berth they are nothing more then paper tigers or the Zona Cardinals with the for a great offseason. have a great day Except have a QB go from his rookie through sophmore season and improve dramatically across the board, win 7 games (when predicted to win 4) and beat the toughest team in the division (your crappy Seachickens) twice for the series sweep. Surprised you didn't notice that, being a Seahawks fan and all. Or are you suggesting that the Niners beating the Seahawks wasn't on the field? I think you should change your all-caps to SOMETHING, since you're clearly wrong here. Once again - assertions straight out of your ass, unsupported and so easily dismissed. Credibility - 1 FlaHawker - 0 That fact is that they not only improved from the 7-9 team that swept the toughest team in the division and knocked Denver out of the playoffs, they improved DRAMATICALLY. They now have arguably the best secondary in the division, and they directly weakend Seattle by taking away their best receiver - and don't fool yourself with Burleson or Branch: DJax was their most reliable receiver. Seattle will struggle to pass the ball in 2007 - mark my words. Niners also added an OT who will save us 50 yards a game from Kwame Harris' false starts. By the way, that Alex Smith you're so unimpressed with? He was better than Hasselbeck last year. Stats don't lie. Games staterd: Smith - 16 Hasselback - 12 Attempts Smith - 442 Hasselback - 371 Completions: Smith - 257 (58.1%) Hasselback - 210 (56.6%) PaYards: Smith - 2890 Hasselback - 2442 PaTDs/Ints: Smith - 16:16 Hasselback - 18:15 Rushing Yds/TDs: Smith - 44 for 147 with 2 TDs Hasselback - 18 for 110, with 0 TDs QB Rating: Smith - 74.8 Hasselback - 76.0 And you hate Alex Smith? Looking at the performances from last year, it looks pretty even to me, with Smith winning most of the catagories, and getting narrowly edged out of the ones he didn't. I'd rather have the guy who managed to start 16 games with the better completion %. Especially considering Smith was in his 2nd year and Hasselbeck was in his 8th. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
piece of work 0 Posted April 30, 2007 Except have a QB go from his rookie through sophmore season and improve dramatically across the board, win 7 games (when predicted to win 4) and beat the toughest team in the division (your crappy Seachickens) twice for the series sweep. Surprised you didn't notice that, being a Seahawks fan and all. Or are you suggesting that the Niners beating the Seahawks wasn't on the field? I think you should change your all-caps to SOMETHING, since you're clearly wrong here. Once again - assertions straight out of your ass, unsupported and so easily dismissed. Credibility - 1 FlaHawker - 0 That fact is that they not only improved from the 7-9 team that swept the toughest team in the division and knocked Denver out of the playoffs, they improved DRAMATICALLY. They now have arguably the best secondary in the division, and they directly weakend Seattle by taking away their best receiver - and don't fool yourself with Burleson or Branch: DJax was their most reliable receiver. Seattle will struggle to pass the ball in 2007 - mark my words. Niners also added an OT who will save us 50 yards a game from Kwame Harris' false starts. By the way, that Alex Smith you're so unimpressed with? He was better than Hasselbeck last year. Stats don't lie. Games staterd: Smith - 16 Hasselback - 12 Attempts Smith - 442 Hasselback - 257 Completions: Smith - 257 (58.1%) Hasselback - 210 (56.6%) PaYards: Smith - 2890 Hasselback - 2442 PaTDs/Ints: Smith - 16:16 Hasselback - 18:15 Rushing Yds/TDs: Smith - 44 for 147 with 2 TDs Hasselback - 18 for 110, with 0 TDs QB Rating: Smith - 74.8 Hasselback - 76.0 And you hate Alex Smith? Looking at the performances from last year, it looks pretty even to me, with Smith winning most of the catagories, and getting narrowly edged out of the ones he didn't. I'd rather have the guy who managed to start 16 games with the better completion %. Especially considering Smith was in his 2nd year and Hasselbeck was in his 8th. You go on with your bad self scoot..... San Fran was 7-9 with a bunch of goof balls on def and Mr. Goof ball himself as the #1 wr.... Antonio Bryant. Imagine what they can do with more vets coming in....free agency and raw talent.....draft. We can argue all day long but I am sold on San Fran being most improved free agency and draft....NE is right there but I do not see them improving a 12-4 record much but San Fran can drastically improve on 7-9. Once again Vernon Davis....if healthy is flying way under the radar for this coming yr..... imho. thanks, pow Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgcrawfish 232 Posted April 30, 2007 Scooter is right, at this point the Niners are a team on the rise and Seattle appears to be a team on the backend of their peak. When healthy (insert big * here) DJackson is a very good receiver and as FS pointed out, directly weakens a Seahawks team that wasn't much better than the Niners last season and lost both meetings to them. With what looks to be solid drafting, free agent spending and trades, they've filled or at least partially filled several of their holes and have some pretty good weaponry w/ Gore, DJax, Davis and an improving Alex Smith. There's no way you can't say that the Seahawks weren't looking back over their shoulder at the gaining Niners last year, and I think this is the year they'll be looking up at them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
football_scooter 0 Posted April 30, 2007 Once again Vernon Davis....if healthy is flying way under the radar for this coming yr..... imho. thanks, pow completely agree with this - Vernon Davis will blow up in 2007. When he came back at the end of last year he was pumped and looked excellent...in an offseason interview he'd said he's never been hurt before and was very upset that he wasn't able to contribute more. I love players that put it on themselves to contribute. The "anti-Moss" - rather than blaming circumstance or those around him for the team's woes, here's a kid that says "my team would have been better if only I'd been better" - that's the sort of character Nolan's been acquiring. The last 2 years have helped the niners for the next 10, IMO. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgcrawfish 232 Posted April 30, 2007 completely agree with this - Vernon Davis will blow up in 2007. When he came back at the end of last year he was pumped and looked excellent...in an offseason interview he'd said he's never been hurt before and was very upset that he wasn't able to contribute more. I love players that put it on themselves to contribute. The "anti-Moss" - rather than blaming circumstance or those around him for the team's woes, here's a kid that says "my team would have been better if only I'd been better" - that's the sort of character Nolan's been acquiring. The last 2 years have helped the niners for the next 10, IMO. Shhhhhhh...quiet already...don't start any Vernon Davis buzz...in fact, he's still hurt and needs a titanium rod placed in shin...yeah, that's the ticket...sssssshhhhhhhhhhhh Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
swamp dog 0 Posted April 30, 2007 Scooter is right, at this point the Niners are a team on the rise and Seattle appears to be a team on the backend of their peak. When healthy (insert big * here) DJackson is a very good receiver and as FS pointed out, directly weakens a Seahawks team that wasn't much better than the Niners last season and lost both meetings to them. With what looks to be solid drafting, free agent spending and trades, they've filled or at least partially filled several of their holes and have some pretty good weaponry w/ Gore, DJax, Davis and an improving Alex Smith. There's no way you can't say that the Seahawks weren't looking back over their shoulder at the gaining Niners last year, and I think this is the year they'll be looking up at them. on the other hand, why would the walrus trade to a team in his own division if he felt jackson was still a threat of some sort? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
football_scooter 0 Posted April 30, 2007 on the other hand, why would the walrus trade to a team in his own division if he felt jackson was still a threat of some sort? You question the move as though Holmgren is some sort of genius. They had to get rid of DJax. They wanted a 4th rounder. SF was the only team to pony it up. They apparently tried dealing him to several other teams, but no takers at that price. But DJax gave them no alternative. Forced their hand, as it were. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jarvis Basnight 119 Posted April 30, 2007 Actually, it's debatable that the 49ers will be the most improved team in their own division. The Rams added James Hall, Drew Bennett, Randy McMichael, Dante Hall, and Chris Draft, to go with Carriker, Leonard, a cb, and adding OL and DL help in the draft. Seems like they've had a really active and solid off season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Belushi 9 Posted April 30, 2007 Except have a QB go from his rookie through sophmore season and improve dramatically across the board, win 7 games (when predicted to win 4) and beat the toughest team in the division (your crappy Seachickens) twice for the series sweep. Surprised you didn't notice that, being a Seahawks fan and all. Or are you suggesting that the Niners beating the Seahawks wasn't on the field? I think you should change your all-caps to SOMETHING, since you're clearly wrong here. Once again - assertions straight out of your ass, unsupported and so easily dismissed. Credibility - 1 FlaHawker - 0 That fact is that they not only improved from the 7-9 team that swept the toughest team in the division and knocked Denver out of the playoffs, they improved DRAMATICALLY. They now have arguably the best secondary in the division, and they directly weakend Seattle by taking away their best receiver - and don't fool yourself with Burleson or Branch: DJax was their most reliable receiver. Seattle will struggle to pass the ball in 2007 - mark my words. Niners also added an OT who will save us 50 yards a game from Kwame Harris' false starts. By the way, that Alex Smith you're so unimpressed with? He was better than Hasselbeck last year. Stats don't lie. Games staterd: Smith - 16 Hasselback - 12 Attempts Smith - 442 Hasselback - 371 Completions: Smith - 257 (58.1%) Hasselback - 210 (56.6%) PaYards: Smith - 2890 Hasselback - 2442 PaTDs/Ints: Smith - 16:16 Hasselback - 18:15 Rushing Yds/TDs: Smith - 44 for 147 with 2 TDs Hasselback - 18 for 110, with 0 TDs QB Rating: Smith - 74.8 Hasselback - 76.0 And you hate Alex Smith? Looking at the performances from last year, it looks pretty even to me, with Smith winning most of the catagories, and getting narrowly edged out of the ones he didn't. I'd rather have the guy who managed to start 16 games with the better completion %. Especially considering Smith was in his 2nd year and Hasselbeck was in his 8th. I'm trying to support you, man, but these points make no sense. How do you compare season totals when one guy played 16 games and one played 12? It's not like Hass is injury prone. The guy missed a few games, and also had to play without his starting RB for most of the year. I think the Niners are on the rise and could win the division, but no way is Alex Smith in Hass's league. Gore carried that team last year. Granted, Smith had no real WR's to throw to either. Might things change this year? Maybe. But Smith can't carry Hass's jock yet. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
football_scooter 0 Posted April 30, 2007 I'm trying to support you, man, but these points make no sense. How do you compare season totals when one guy played 16 games and one played 12? It's not like Hass is injury prone. The guy missed a few games, and also had to play without his starting RB for most of the year. I think the Niners are on the rise and could win the division, but no way is Alex Smith in Hass's league. Gore carried that team last year. Granted, Smith had no real WR's to throw to either. Might things change this year? Maybe. But Smith can't carry Hass's jock yet. I just pointed out the stats, I didn't say Alex Smith is a better Qb than Hasselbeck. But if you're high on Hasselbeck after last season it's somewhat irrational to be hating on Smith, since he was more productive. That's the only point I was making. Feel free to infer anything else you like though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
piece of work 0 Posted April 30, 2007 I just pointed out the stats, I didn't say Alex Smith is a better Qb than Hasselbeck. But if you're high on Hasselbeck after last season it's somewhat irrational to be hating on Smith, since he was more productive. That's the only point I was making. Feel free to infer anything else you like though. Noones is saying he is better......... it just means alex smith stock is rising.....ex AFLAC stock and Matt Hasselbeck's stock is fallin....ex Ewing Oil......just my opinion agree w/ ya scoot........... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
piece of work 0 Posted May 1, 2007 Noones is saying he is better......... it just means alex smith stock is rising.....ex AFLAC stock and Matt Hasselbeck's stock is fallin....ex Ewing Oil......just my opinion agree w/ ya scoot........... anyone want some bobby ewing or JR ewing stock ....... oil is on the up and up........ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
culboarder11 0 Posted May 1, 2007 SF is better this year.. but the same thing has been said about Arizona EVERY YEAR. Seattle is still the team to beat... If they stay healthy like 2 years ago, they will most likely be NFC Champs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
piece of work 0 Posted May 1, 2007 SF is better this year.. but the same thing has been said about Arizona EVERY YEAR. Seattle is still the team to beat... If they stay healthy like 2 years ago, they will most likely be NFC Champs. nfc champs or nfc west champs ?????????? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Savage Beast 1 Posted May 1, 2007 SF better keep improving their entire team, because Alex Smith is a Rex Grossman clone but even worse. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites