The Moz 69 Posted September 7, 2007 By Day of Islam I mean the senerio that is in that one guys book. The ultimate plan of Bin Laden and his peoples. 7 Nuclear Bombs in 7 US cities ( DC, Miami, NYC, LA, Las Vegas , Houston , Boston ) all going off at the exact same time. Juts wondering what would happen if this occured. In America: I am pretty sure we could get through it as a country -- but IMO our economy would be that of Canada afterwards , no longer would be a superpower , would take 10 - 20 years to rebuild the cities and economy . Right afterwards : If Hillary is in office ( assuming she survives ) - likely nothing - which in all honesty might be the best thing to do in the long term as tough as it would be to swallow. If Obama -- a measured response most directed at Pakistan - possibly nuclear. If Thompson or Gulliani is in Office ( assuming they survive ) - Definitley would be a nuclear response - how measured would depend on who was president. Gulliani more measured -- Thompson more kill everyone. Bush -- maybe Tehran , Mecca , Medina , Ryhiad , Syria , Pakistan -- would all be hit heavily with Nukes. anyone have any thoughts on what might play out if this actually occured. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,086 Posted September 7, 2007 I would personaly take out the entire Islamic world. There would be no focking around. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davebg 0 Posted September 7, 2007 I would personaly take out the entire Islamic world. There would be no focking around. Agreed. Maybe...MAYBE we tip of the Israelis to get the fock out, but likely not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted September 7, 2007 Bush -- maybe Tehran , Mecca , Medina , Ryhiad , Syria , Pakistan -- would all be hit heavily with Nukes. I have no clue how it would play out, but I find it hard to believe that even Bush and Co. would start randomly lobbing nukes in response to a terrorist attack. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,086 Posted September 7, 2007 I have no clue how it would play out, but I find it hard to believe that even Bush and Co. would start randomly lobbing nukes in response to a terrorist attack. Why the fock not! Do you realy believe that it is just one person that hates the US that much to use NUKES? It is and will remain an entire people. Islamics. They teach their young to hate and raise them to randomly kill. Only one way to solve that problem. Kill them all and let God sort them out. and no I would not Nuke them unless they Nuke us first. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,316 Posted September 7, 2007 Looking over the list, I'd say all those cities are expendable. So long as they stay out of the midwest we'll be OK. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted September 7, 2007 Why the fock not! Do you realy believe that it is just one person that hates the US that much to use NUKES? It is and will remain an entire people. Islamics. They teach their young to hate and raise them to randomly kill. Only one way to solve that problem. Kill them all and let God sort them out.and no I would not Nuke them unless they Nuke us first. You know, I actually started to type a response to this, then I figured "What's the point?" Later. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Moz 69 Posted September 7, 2007 Looking over the list, I'd say all those cities are expendable. So long as they stay out of the midwest we'll be OK. Tough talk from a man that lives in China ! I would agree with Miami and LA though -- just saying is all Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
davebg 0 Posted September 7, 2007 Looking over the list, I'd say all those cities are expendable. So long as they stay out of the midwest we'll be OK. Do you have any idea how much primo poon would be lost if all of those cities were nuked? I don't think I'd want to live in a country that looks like the audience for Jerry Springer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Moz 69 Posted September 7, 2007 but I find it hard to believe that even Bush and Co. would start randomly lobbing nukes in response to a terrorist attack. Sorry -- I wouldn't couldn't put anything past GWB.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,086 Posted September 7, 2007 You know, I actually started to type a response to this, then I figured "What's the point?" Later. Pvssy I'm bored and want to argue Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Snuff 10 Posted September 7, 2007 You know, I actually started to type a response to this, then I figured "What's the point?" Later. We could just apologize to all of the terrorists and Islamic folk about how we are responsible for the situation in the ME, and how they still live in the stone age, eventhough conflict and the Flintstones have been part of their culture for thousands of years before the US became a nation. And then we could rebuild and welcome them to live on our lands at the current US residents' expense. I have a feeling many people here would welcome that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted September 7, 2007 We could just apologize to all of the terrorists and Islamic folk about how we are responsible for the situation in the ME, and how they still live in the stone age, eventhough conflict and the Flintstones have been part of their culture for thousands of years before the US became a nation. And then we could rebuild and welcome them to live on our lands at the current US residents' expense. I have a feeling many people here would welcome that. Yeah, that or random nuking would be pretty much our only options, obviously. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Snuff 10 Posted September 7, 2007 Yeah, that or random nuking would be pretty much our only options, obviously. Us fuel guys got it going on in da head. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akaoni 0 Posted September 7, 2007 Why the fock not! Do you realy believe that it is just one person that hates the US that much to use NUKES? It is and will remain an entire people. Islamics. They teach their young to hate and raise them to randomly kill. Only one way to solve that problem. Kill them all and let God sort them out.and no I would not Nuke them unless they Nuke us first. So if, let's say an Egyptian carried out the attacks, you'd nuke Malaysia? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,316 Posted September 7, 2007 Tough talk from a man that lives in China ! I would agree with Miami and LA though -- just saying is all I don't think even the Bush administration could botch uncovering a plan that grand. Well, not after the last one anyways. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites