iglehart 0 Posted August 14, 2010 I am the commish of a league with veto power. I have only vetoed one trade in my 6 years. The reason I vetoed the trade was because I suspected collusion. I do not suspect collusion this time and have been asked by 1/2 the league to veto this trade. I would like opinions! Charles for Turner Both would be keepers Charles would be kept at 16th round and could be kept for 2 years Turner would be kept at a 3rd round and could only be kept for 1 year. Thanks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
madd futher mucker 36 Posted August 14, 2010 It makes no sense to post on both boards. Traditionally trade veto questions are good on the main bored. The main board is not appropriate for rate my team and who do i start questions. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MRclutch4 0 Posted August 14, 2010 You said they "would be keepers" if the trade went through. Does that mean that they aren't keepers right now? If they aren't keepers right now, i'd say veto the trade. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iglehart 0 Posted August 15, 2010 Sorry, posted here first and did not get responses. Yes they are both keepers before the draft. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrgymrat 0 Posted August 16, 2010 (Seems like posting this on the "A Little Help!" board shouldn't be a problema) I would let the trade go thru. Obviously the person wanting Charles knows what he is getting (w/ an extra yr as a keeper having some value). They're really not that far apart regardless of Thomas Jones for this yr. Certainly not anywhere vetoing IMO Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Longus 2 Posted August 16, 2010 I am the commish of a league with veto power. I have only vetoed one trade in my 6 years. The reason I vetoed the trade was because I suspected collusion. I do not suspect collusion this time and have been asked by 1/2 the league to veto this trade. I would like opinions! Charles for Turner Both would be keepers Charles would be kept at 16th round and could be kept for 2 years Turner would be kept at a 3rd round and could only be kept for 1 year. Thanks if you dont suspect collusion and these were both keepers already then i would not veto. although i would try to make a trade with the team that wants JC bc he obviously doesnt really know what a good trade is. http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=367165 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tippett56 0 Posted August 16, 2010 Don't veto the trade. The guy getting Charles is giving up a LATE round pick for him which isn't a bad idea. It's not like he is trading Turner for a Kicker! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bishop82 61 Posted August 16, 2010 Don't veto the trade. The guy getting Charles is giving up a LATE round pick for him which isn't a bad idea. It's not like he is trading Turner for a Kicker! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
