Daltnator 19 Posted August 17, 2013 I am getting a gut feeling the more I read about Bradford for this year. With Jake long in town and and a gifted speedy Austin and a RB that will be busting his arse to prove himself, I am starting to like Bradford. How crazy would I be to wait late in the draft and try to grab him as my QB1? I think he may overachieve this year. Granted. I know he wont produce Big 3 numbers, but if I load up at RB and WR depth, maybe his abilities can help my team get to the post season! Maybe, Silly or Stupid?? Im also really high on Boldin and Amendola as WR1s. How high in the draft do folks think they will go? I just like getting others opinions, so fire away!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ralphster 274 Posted August 17, 2013 How does Bradford look? Like a high end QB2. Someone nice to pair with Romo or RG3 if you wait on QBs. I have him as QB15 this year. Boldin is showing 'good chemistry' with Kaep but will be a possession WR in SF. Still valuable as a WR3; 77-865-5 imo. Amendola will perform as a WR1 in most games until he breaks his mangina, I'd project him for about 90-1000-6. Plenty of value for where he's being drafted though (late 4th). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daltnator 19 Posted August 17, 2013 How does Bradford look? Like a high end QB2. Someone nice to pair with Romo or RG3 if you wait on QBs. I have him as QB15 this year. Boldin is showing 'good chemistry' with Kaep but will be a possession WR in SF. Still valuable as a WR3; 77-865-5 imo. Amendola will perform as a WR1 in most games until he breaks his mangina, I'd project him for about 90-1000-6. Plenty of value for where he's being drafted though (late 4th). Thanks man! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 3,314 Posted August 17, 2013 QB1 would be crazy, but I think he's a nice QB2 option with upside. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
enefelcom 0 Posted August 17, 2013 Agree--QB2 w/ upside. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5Year1 23 Posted August 17, 2013 I would take a wait and see on Bradford. Unless its a 16 team league, I don't see him as a QB 1 ahead of people like Romo, Luck and RGIII who you can probably get mid draft. If there is roster room, drafting him late as a wait and see back up is OK. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
montana 89 Posted August 17, 2013 How does Bradford look? Like a high end QB2. Someone nice to pair with Romo or RG3 if you wait on QBs. I have him as QB15 this year. Boldin is showing 'good chemistry' with Kaep but will be a possession WR in SF. Still valuable as a WR3; 77-865-5 imo. Amendola will perform as a WR1 in most games until he breaks his mangina, I'd project him for about 90-1000-6. Plenty of value for where he's being drafted though (late 4th). Romo & Bradford have same bye week. If I take Romo, I grab Palmer #2. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ralphster 274 Posted August 17, 2013 Romo & Bradford have same bye week. If I take Romo, I grab Palmer #2. Good looking out Montana Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Viking14 5 Posted August 17, 2013 How can he be bad, Bradford. Good receivers now including a pass catching running back and their weakness is DEFENSE. A lot of points scored - SWEET!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zac3434 5 Posted August 17, 2013 Our weakness is defense? I think not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ralphster 274 Posted August 18, 2013 Our weakness is defense? I think not. QFT. The rams have been improving on defense the last few years. They are criminally underrated right now imo. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 2,459 Posted August 18, 2013 I am getting a gut feeling the more I read about Bradford for this year. With Jake long in town and and a gifted speedy Austin and a RB that will be busting his arse to prove himself, I am starting to like Bradford. How crazy would I be to wait late in the draft and try to grab him as my QB1? I think he may overachieve this year. Granted. I know he wont produce Big 3 numbers, but if I load up at RB and WR depth, maybe his abilities can help my team get to the post season! Maybe, Silly or Stupid?? Im also really high on Boldin and Amendola as WR1s. How high in the draft do folks think they will go? I just like getting others opinions, so fire away!! i see bradford has a high number 2 backup ..but he could make a good 1 and like you said load up on them rb wr imo ..best part about ff is to roll the dice and lets see what happens.if you see his points last season he was a med to low 2 ..i think they have better talent around him this season .but wow they play 6 very tough divison games this season that divison is very good the best i say Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,583 Posted August 18, 2013 Bradford is a safe boring option this year. Someone who I like to pair with boom/bust qbs like Vick or RG3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LandenChase 0 Posted August 18, 2013 STL has a brutal schedule for QBs. As a matter of fact, Bradford has the toughest schedule in the league. I would almost rather Cutler, Freeman, or Alex Smith. I know it sounds crazy, but Bradford may not have the great season some are thinking. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fantasy Noob 10 Posted August 18, 2013 I agree with LandenChase. Tough schedule, his WR's still suck and at the end of the day he just isn't that good. It seems odd since his rookie season was so promising but he seems to have just settled in to pure mediocrity. Maybe he takes the next step with the O-line improvements. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5Year1 23 Posted August 18, 2013 STL has a brutal schedule for QBs. As a matter of fact, Bradford has the toughest schedule in the league. I would almost rather Cutler, Freeman, or Alex Smith. I know it sounds crazy, but Bradford may not have the great season some are thinking. But he still did better than all 3 last year. Cutler and Freeman are very erratic and Freeman just killed his Fantasy players over that 4 game stretch late in the season. Bradford is definitely not a #1, so we are not "expecting a great season", but he is a serviceable back up and a better choice than these guys and several others as the #2 in a 2 QB league. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cstriker 2 Posted August 18, 2013 I dont know how schottenheimer has a job in the NFL as a OC. His scheme is what is ultimately going to hold any talented team back imo. Sorry for bradford, but yet another OC change is needed for him to fully realize his potential. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
