drobeski 3,061 Posted February 22, 2015 what difference did it make that Williams did it? Other than you think of him as a mouthpiece for the left? Really, neither made much of a difference...one lost his credibility as he should have. Can't be a news guy and embelish like that. THe other will fight and his supporters don't care if he lies. ask his bosses ? pretty sure i didn't suspend him. Who's mentioned what williams did other than you ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 22, 2015 ask his bosses ? pretty sure i didn't suspend him. Who's mentioned what williams did other than you ? Its f7nny how you cared so much when it was Williams and you blasted him. Now all of a sudden lying doesn't matter. Id ask why is that...but the reason is clear. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 22, 2015 Its f7nny how you cared so much when it was Williams and you blasted him. Now all of a sudden lying doesn't matter. Id ask why is that...but the reason is clear.link? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
avoiding injuries 1,652 Posted February 22, 2015 One thing that's come out of all this...with how defensive liberals have gotten about Brian Williams, there's no more denying where the networks stand politically. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,063 Posted February 22, 2015 One thing that's come out of all this...with how defensive liberals have gotten about Brian Williams, there's no more denying where the networks stand politically. Haven't seen anyone get "defensive" about Brian Williams. Have seen a lot of people point out the hypocrisy of the right though Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 22, 2015 link? So you are denying that you said anything about Williams? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 22, 2015 One thing that's come out of all this...with how defensive liberals have gotten about Brian Williams, there's no more denying where the networks stand politically. Who here was defensive about Williams? Seems plenty have gotten defensive about O'Reilly and the consensus from everyone was that Williams was lying and was wrong and deserved losing his job. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,063 Posted February 23, 2015 Said he had an M16 pointed at his head: http://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2015/02/22/rs-stelter-intv-bts-engberg-new-bill-oreilly-video.cnn Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 6,899 Posted February 23, 2015 This isn't going to end well for Mr. Bill. No one really cared that he forced an intern to have phone sex with him, while he jammed a di1do up his ass. Now he has crossed the line Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 23, 2015 This isn't going to end well for Mr. Bill. No one really cared that he forced an intern to have phone sex with him, while he jammed a di1do up his ass. Now he has crossed the line clinton forced real sex with his intern. oh chit, wrong bill Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,439 Posted February 23, 2015 O'Reilly's job is making up stories that will pass for news without having any reference to accuracy, so really, he was just doing his job...he'll probably get a raise. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magnificent Bastard 192 Posted February 23, 2015 clinton forced real sex with his intern. oh chit, wrong bill I don't think President Clinton had to force himself on anyone, chicks dig him. And W Bush was a coke head. Fact. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 6,899 Posted February 23, 2015 clinton forced real sex with his intern. oh chit, wrong bill You'll have to make up something better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 23, 2015 So you are denying that you said anything about Williams? No answer to this either drobeski? You seem to be turning into phurfur with your inability to answer direct questions. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 6,899 Posted February 23, 2015 No answer to this either drobeski? You seem to be turning into phurfur a politician with your inability to answer direct questions. fixed Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 23, 2015 i said stuff about orielly in this thread creapo...and.hillary in another, Hillary is more significant than both but you hacks dont care now scram fruitcake Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 23, 2015 i said stuff about orielly in this thread creapo...and.hillary in another, Hillary is more significant than both but you hacks dont care now scram fruitcake You don't read well do you? You denied saying things about Brian Williams above. What you said about O'Reilly? Other than calling those who were going after him liberal hacks? You have basically turn the other way on his lies and defended him...while you blasted Williams. I don't give a fock about Hillary...you keep bringing her up as if anyone on this board supports her. You are a hypocritical hack...as often pointed out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 23, 2015 brian williams is a lying lefty hack, fact. what else you want to know creepster ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted February 23, 2015 I'm pretty sure everyone knows that. And has no problem with him losing his job for it. His question is, what are your feelings on O'Reilly if it's shown that he did the same thing? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,063 Posted February 23, 2015 I gotta hand it to O'Reilly, if he gets out of this--and I'm sure he will-- then he really turned this around to his advantage. Apparently talking about it on his show, so he's using it as another talking point and to gain ratings/drum up interest. Clever. Williams could not have done that because his show was legitimate news. But as an entertainer O'Reilly is playing by a whole different set of rules Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GobbleDog 1,010 Posted February 23, 2015 Even if it's true, it wouldn't have the sane effect as Williams lying. O'Reilly is an opinion guy. Not a journalist. Williams is supposed to be reporting the news. Facts. For him to be a known liar ruins his credibility.I watch(ed) Brian Williams because he has the best anchorman persona of all the major networks. Not for his "honest reporting" because he doesn't do any actual investigation. That's the job of the real reporters. Now that he's been caught embellishing a personal story, people act like he can't be trusted to say "in the news today..." as if the next sentence will be totally fictitious. As for Orielly, nobody cares what he says anyway except for die hard conservatives. And they don't care if he lies, as long as it corresponds with whatever Rush Limbaugh says. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted February 23, 2015 I know, Gobbledog. I said as much myself earlier in the thread. O'Reilly isn't expected to tell the truth the way Williams was. And his fanboys certainly don't care. They'd be more inclined to stop listening to him if he ever told the total truth and praised someone who was a Democrat. He says exactly what he knows his listeners want him to say. But unlike Williams, the public knows that O'Reilly is just an op-ed guy. He's not supposed to be reporting facts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 23, 2015 I'm pretty sure everyone knows that. And has no problem with him losing his job for it. His question is, what are your feelings on O'Reilly if it's shown that he did the same thing?i still think he's a blowhard Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,439 Posted February 23, 2015 i still think he's a blowhard so you feel a kinship with him? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 23, 2015 so you feel a kinship with him? hey look its that wicked unfunny gay loser mike honcho ready for hillary mikey ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BunnysBastatrds 2,606 Posted February 23, 2015 I don't think President Clinton had to force himself on anyone, chicks dig him. And W Bush was a coke head. Fact. Bill Clinton's brother nick named Bill "The Shovel" for the large amounts of bumps he would take. Fact. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 23, 2015 brian williams is a lying lefty hack, fact. what else you want to know creepster ? Not quite a hack...he is a liar though. Its funny that it took you til the end to finally say BOR was a hack...but you defended him this whole thread and whined that those bringing up his lies were just lefty hacks. Typical of your normal behavior of being a hypocritical hack. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,902 Posted February 23, 2015 Guys like O'Reilly have it made. Get nailed being a hypocritical dooshbag liar and all you have to do is claim witch hunt / biased media. Guys like BOR are immune to facts, common sense and reality. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,439 Posted February 23, 2015 hey look its that wicked unfunny gay loser mike honcho ready for hillary mikey ? You must have been the coolest guy around....in 1984. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BunnysBastatrds 2,606 Posted February 23, 2015 I watch(ed) Brian Williams because he has the best anchorman persona of all the major networks. Not for his "honest reporting" because he doesn't do any actual investigation. That's the job of the real reporters. Now that he's been caught embellishing a personal story, people act like he can't be trusted to say "in the news today..." as if the next sentence will be totally fictitious. As for Orielly, nobody cares what he says anyway except for die hard conservatives. And they don't care if he lies, as long as it corresponds with whatever Rush Limbaugh says. One reports the news and one comments on the news. There is a big difference between the two. Or their is supposed to be a big difference between the two. With today's biased media, it's becoming more acceptable for those that are supposed to report the news to slant a story based on their beliefs. Print media has been getting away with this for decades. I'm actually surprised Williams got a six month time out for this. I don't feel he should have. He tried to strengthen his credibility and got caught. The network execs got scared and didn't back him. You rarely see the left do that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted February 23, 2015 Bill Clinton's brother nick named Bill "The Shovel" for the large amounts of bumps he would take. Fact.And? He was an awesome President. I couldn't give two sh!ts if he did blow or heroin or crack. Nor would I care if I found out Reagan did. Those two could have been doing anything they liked in their personal time. Doesn't change how great they were for our country. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magnificent Bastard 192 Posted February 23, 2015 Bill Clinton's brother nick named Bill "The Shovel" for the large amounts of bumps he would take. Fact. And you're an alcoholic so........... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 23, 2015 And? He was an awesome President. I couldn't give two sh!ts if he did blow or heroin or crack. Nor would I care if I found out Reagan did. Those two could have been doing anything they liked in their personal time. Doesn't change how great they were for our country.sending our mfg jobs to china was great Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,902 Posted February 23, 2015 sending our mfg jobs to china was great Really? You're going to defend your hero GWB and use an avatar of him or years, then rip Clinton for NAFTA? Hack. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted February 23, 2015 Really? You're going to defend your hero GWB and use an avatar of him or years, then rip Clinton for NAFTA? Hack. It's not like you're surprised, right? Fatty Hackington could never admit that Clinton was a good President. Him and RP love to claim that the board lefties are just as big of hacks as they are, but this is the true test. I have openly admitted since day one that Clinton and Reagan were the two best of my lifetime. Those two jerkoffs could NEVER admit that Clinton was great. They stick right to the party line. The lunatic fringe right. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted February 23, 2015 Really? You're going to defend your hero GWB and use an avatar of him or years, then rip Clinton for NAFTA? Hack. so nafta was great for the country? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,902 Posted February 23, 2015 so nafta was great for the country? Just seems like a sort of nitpicky thing to hammer Clinton over given your love affair with GWB. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Magnificent Bastard 192 Posted February 23, 2015 so nafta was great for the country? Better than Sarah Palin and the Iraq war. Nafta sucked, was passed by a Republican Congress, and those jobs, for the most part, were going away anyhow. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HenryHill9323 65 Posted February 23, 2015 It's not like you're surprised, right? Fatty Hackington could never admit that Clinton was a good President. Him and RP love to claim that the board lefties are just as big of hacks as they are, but this is the true test. I have openly admitted since day one that Clinton and Reagan were the two best of my lifetime. Those two jerkoffs could NEVER admit that Clinton was great. They stick right to the party line. The lunatic fringe right. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted February 23, 2015 One reports the news and one comments on the news. There is a big difference between the two. Or their is supposed to be a big difference between the two. With today's biased media, it's becoming more acceptable for those that are supposed to report the news to slant a story based on their beliefs. Print media has been getting away with this for decades. I'm actually surprised Williams got a six month time out for this. I don't feel he should have. He tried to strengthen his credibility and got caught. The network execs got scared and didn't back him. You rarely see the left do that. Now...sure...though, the lies being exposed was not just BOR commenting on things. Now, yes, he is just a commenter and already known as quite biased...add liar to it. As I said...he makes a great guest on shows and is a very good writer...the rest of his persona though...oof. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
