Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Strike

WINNING! MAGA!

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Baker Boy said:

From the guy who thinks we’re can fund single payer and free college for $115 billion.

if you don’t understand what is going on along the border today and the progress that has been made you can’t be helped. You are nothing more than an instant gratification Millennial.

I think we could absolutely fund a social program if we got rid of the huge flow of immigrants. Not that I want to, but we could. 

Instant gratification? This problems needed fixing since he 60s. You all want to claim we MAGA’d and kick the can down the road. He won his election because he said he would fix the immigration problem and it isn’t fixed and his second term is no guarantee. He could turn the immigration rhetoric up to 10, start tweeting about it etc... but he isn’t. He could definitely do more I know that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

I think we could absolutely fund a social program if we got rid of the huge flow of immigrants. Not that I want to, but we could. 

Instant gratification? This problems needed fixing since he 60s. You all want to claim we MAGA’d and kick the can down the road. He won his election because he said he would fix the immigration problem and it isn’t fixed and his second term is no guarantee. He could turn the immigration rhetoric up to 10, start tweeting about it etc... but he isn’t. He could definitely do more I know that. 

I see you still haven’t bothered to find out what we are doing on the border. You can’t fix a 50 year problem by your self but the strides he has made have been incredible. Vote for Warren and quit whining!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

I see you still haven’t bothered to find out what we are doing on the border. You can’t fix a 50 year problem by your self but the strides he has made have been incredible. Vote for Warren and quit whining!

Border crossings are only a small portion of the immigration problem. What about all the visas we give out every year? What’s he doing about those? That’s a far bigger issue than Mexicans running over the border. 

Yeah man I’m gonna vote for Warren, lol. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Louisiana Republicans score big legislative wins

Amid record turnout for what is usually a sleepy off-year, irregular election, Louisiana Republicans locked up enough seats in the state Senate to amount to a super majority. The party came within seven seats of winning a super majority in the state House, too, with eight runoff elections to come in November.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/465739-louisiana-republicans-score-big-legislative-wins

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Baker Boy said:

Louisiana Republicans score big legislative wins

Amid record turnout for what is usually a sleepy off-year, irregular election, Louisiana Republicans locked up enough seats in the state Senate to amount to a super majority. The party came within seven seats of winning a super majority in the state House, too, with eight runoff elections to come in November.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/465739-louisiana-republicans-score-big-legislative-wins

 

Yeah, but are the Dem's claiming they won regardless of that actual outcome?  I mean, they only respect elections when they win them  😁

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump is on his way to an easy win in 2020, according to Moody’s accurate election model

The Moody’s models have been backtested to 1980 and were correct each time — except in 2016, when it indicated Clinton would get a narrow victory.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/15/moodys-trump-on-his-way-to-an-easy-2020-win-if-economy-holds-up.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Baker Boy said:

Trump is on his way to an easy win in 2020, according to Moody’s accurate election model

The Moody’s models have been backtested to 1980 and were correct each time — except in 2016, when it indicated Clinton would get a narrow victory.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/15/moodys-trump-on-his-way-to-an-easy-2020-win-if-economy-holds-up.html

So out of 2 competitive elections in that timeframe it got one right and one wrong?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, bandrus1 said:

So out of 2 competitive elections in that timeframe it got one right and one wrong?

From the article...."The modeling has been highly accurate going back to the 1980 election, missing only once."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Mr. Hand said:

From the article...."The modeling has been highly accurate going back to the 1980 election, missing only once."

Right and the only 2 extremely competitive elections in that time period were Bush Gore and Clinton Trump  and they went 50/50 on them

 

shrug

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, bandrus1 said:

Right and the only 2 extremely competitive elections in that time period were Bush Gore and Clinton Trump  and they went 50/50 on them

 

shrug

And 2020 won't be competitive, so we can declare Trump the winner.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, bandrus1 said:

Right and the only 2 extremely competitive elections in that time period were Bush Gore and Clinton Trump  and they went 50/50 on them

 

shrug

Reagan was suppose to loose twice according to many polls and predictions. In 2016 the week before the election people were giving Hillary a 12 point lead while Moody gave her a slight edge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Baker Boy said:

Reagan was suppose to loose twice according to many polls and predictions. In 2016 the week before the election people were giving Hillary a 12 point lead while Moody gave her a slight edge.

regan was favored in both final November Gallop polls 47-44 and then 59-41 which I guess the 80 polls were closer than I realized even though the election was total destruction 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, bandrus1 said:

regan was favored in both final November Gallop polls 47-44 and then 59-41 which I guess the 80 polls were closer than I realized even though the election was total destruction 

 

Ronald Reagan Beat Jimmy Carter in a Landslide Despite Trailing 6% in Polls?

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/carter-reagan-polls/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

New trade deal, horrible NAFTA to be replaced. Democrats trying to claim credit, as if it were their idea. They weren't even talking about it until Trump brought it up and made it one of his campaign points. Promises made, promises kept. He should rename it the "magic wand" trade deal. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/17/2019 at 12:31 PM, bandrus1 said:

regan was favored in both final November Gallop polls 47-44 and then 59-41 which I guess the 80 polls were closer than I realized even though the election was total destruction 

in almost every election, republican support is understated and then the polls shift towards the end in favor of the republican. so if you only look at the final poll they seem ok bit if you look at the entire period of polling you see democrat bias.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

 

Can anyone figure out why the democrats would want that? I'm at a loss. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, riversco said:

in almost every election, republican support is understated and then the polls shift towards the end in favor of the republican. so if you only look at the final poll they seem ok bit if you look at the entire period of polling you see democrat bias.  

Because the Democrats religion is their party. And like any other zealot they are loud and proud. Explains everything you need to know about their behavior when it comes to politics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I voted for Dan. Talked to him at his campaign kickoff. It was at somebody's house. Really cool. About 30 of us in the living room asking questions. Super smart guy but agree, left out why the Democrats want it at zero. 

Only thing comes to mind is they don't want drug prices going down. Trump gets a major victory which Americans would notice immediately and they lose more voters. 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, FlyinHeadlock said:

I voted for Dan. Talked to him at his campaign kickoff. It was at somebody's house. Really cool. About 30 of us in the living room asking questions. Super smart guy but agree, left out why the Democrats want it at zero. 

Only thing comes to mind is they don't want drug prices going down. Trump gets a major victory which Americans would notice immediately and they lose more voters. 

Plus Drug companies can now market their own drugs for cheap on day 1 in Mexico and Canada instead of waiting 5 years.  High prices here, cheap prices there, win-win for big pharma.  I am sure the money trail to certain politicians is easy to see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×