Filthy Fernadez Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/04/justice-department-investigating-clinton-foundation-over-pay-to-play-allegations.html http://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/01/04/report-department-of-justice-reopens-investigation-into-hillarys-email-server Guess the DOJ/FBI are looking to get back to actually enforcing the Laws of the country. Quote
Filthy Fernadez Posted January 5, 2018 Author Posted January 5, 2018 Listening in on a few of the talking heads that were already trying to tell people to 'move on' from investigating Hillary and Bill. Not before they pay their pound of flesh. Quote
wiffleball Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 Well Great, hopefully they can just dust off the first 7 investigations. Might as well go all in and start looking for Bush's missing emails too. Quote
Filthy Fernadez Posted January 5, 2018 Author Posted January 5, 2018 Well Great, hopefully they can just dust off the first 7 investigations. Like Comey email draft version 1.0 where he mentions Felony and/or criminal? Quote
lickin_starfish Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 You can't have it both ways. If Hill and Bill shouldn't be investigated, then neither should Trump. Justice for all. Quote
wiffleball Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 You can't have it both ways. If Hill and Bill shouldn't be investigated, then neither should Trump. Justice for all. When they finish Trump off for the 7th time? Then that comment will be relevant Quote
avoiding injuries Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 This would explain the house fire the Clintons had last weekend. 1 Quote
cbfalcon Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 You can't have it both ways. If Hill and Bill shouldn't be investigated, then neither should Trump. Justice for all. The left leaning posters accept your trade. One unemployed lady for The President of the United States. Hopefully the other league posters dont try and veto this trade. Quote
lickin_starfish Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 If Trump broke the law, lock him up. I have no problem with it. It is blatantly obvious what Hillary did, and she needs to go to jail. Quote
cbfalcon Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 If Trump broke the law, lock him up. I have no problem with it. It is blatantly obvious what Hillary did, and she needs to go to jail. We will see what can be proved up in each case. Just know that we are Thrilled to have you supporting Muellers efforts in regards to the Trump investigation. Quote
Alias Detective Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 We will see what can be proved up in each case. Just know that we are Thrilled to have you supporting Muellers efforts in regards to the Trump investigation. So now proof is what is needed? Not just speculation and random people offering 10 million to create impeachment info...you are a tool. 1 Quote
cyclone24 Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 Lol....but but Trump!! Be interesting to see if she actually gets nailed when she doesn't have everyone under the sun covering for her. 1 Quote
cbfalcon Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 So now proof is what is needed? Not just speculation and random people offering 10 million to create impeachment info...you are a tool. There will always be crazies that want punishment first and to ask questions later....but for the reasonable thinkers, It's always been the case that proof is needed. Quote
Filthy Fernadez Posted January 5, 2018 Author Posted January 5, 2018 When they finish Trump off for the 7th time? Then that comment will be relevant Clintons don't have the DOJ/FBI on their side this time. Also, the DNC and MSM may play along to wrestle back control from the Clintons. If they're smart, they play along then decry it when elections roll around. Quote
DankNuggs Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 I heard on the radio that Huma sent her DoD passwords to a yahoo email that got hacked by the russians Quote
IGotWorms Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 Whats next, a new investigation on JFKs mistresses? About as relevant today Quote
Hardcore troubadour Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 Now the libs don't want an investigation. Jeez, make up your minds. It's either justice you seek or it isn't. Quote
IGotWorms Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 Now the libs don't want an investigation. Jeez, make up your minds. It's either justice you seek or it isn't. I dont give a sh1t. Just not sure why anyone else does either. She lost the g0ddamn election. Its over, been over for more than a year. Once again: move on. Quote
Strike Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 I dont give a sh1t. Just not sure why anyone else does either. She lost the g0ddamn election. Its over, been over for more than a year. Once again: move on. Because if she committed CRIMES she should be prosecuted. This has nothing to do with the election. Idiot. 1 Quote
cbfalcon Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 Because if she committed CRIMES she should be prosecuted. This has nothing to do with the election. Idiot. I guess I get it. Sure, she isn't even news worthy at this point so people like me could care less, but hatred is a very powerful emotion and you need the satisfaction of seeing her go down.....I am trying to imagine it being 2020 and info coming to light about a retired Paul Ryan type. I'd like to believe I'll be living in that present and not worried about insignificant politicians from the past, but there is a solid chance I'd still crave seeing him go down. Quote
Filthy Fernadez Posted January 5, 2018 Author Posted January 5, 2018 I dont give a sh1t. Just not sure why anyone else does either. She lost the g0ddamn election. Its over, been over for more than a year. Once again: move on. "Move on" when Democrats ard investigated fairly......"Let's keep digging" when Repubs getting investigated illegally. Integrity is a virtue....I suggest you become acquainted with it. Quote
Filthy Fernadez Posted January 5, 2018 Author Posted January 5, 2018 Just curious if left leaners want to defnd Hillary or just are against anything that helps Trump. Anyone care to shed light on that? Quote
Strike Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 I guess I get it. Sure, she isn't even news worthy at this point so people like me could care less, but hatred is a very powerful emotion and you need the satisfaction of seeing her go down.....I am trying to imagine it being 2020 and info coming to light about a retired Paul Ryan type. I'd like to believe I'll be living in that present and not worried about insignificant politicians from the past, but there is a solid chance I'd still crave seeing him go down. Nothing to do with hatred. I have a personal problem with ANYONE who would put our country's security at risk for financial gain. I consider it treasonous behavior. And, as an I.T. person, I understand how unbelievably negligent she was with her bathroom basement server. Quote
cbfalcon Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 Nothing to do with hatred. I have a personal problem with ANYONE who would put our country's security at risk for financial gain. I consider it treasonous behavior. And, as an I.T. person, I understand how unbelievably negligent she was with her bathroom basement server. Fair enough. Just stay consistent with that stance and I'll respect it. Quote
Strike Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 Fair enough. Just stay consistent with that stance and I'll respect it. I've been consistent with it. Just as I've been consistent in saying that NEITHER Trump nor HItlery were qualified to be President. This isn't about some partisan witch hunt. Quote
IGotWorms Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 I guess I get it. Sure, she isn't even news worthy at this point so people like me could care less, but hatred is a very powerful emotion and you need the satisfaction of seeing her go down.....I am trying to imagine it being 2020 and info coming to light about a retired Paul Ryan type. I'd like to believe I'll be living in that present and not worried about insignificant politicians from the past, but there is a solid chance I'd still crave seeing him go down. I dunno, I think I really am better than the folks on the other side of the coin here. When Obama came in did I want to see members of Ws administration charged with war crimes? No. I believe some of them like Rumsfeld and Cheney probably couldve been for that Iraq war bullsh1t, plus there was all the illegal detention and torture stuff. But I thought it was more appropriate to move on and not risk the precedent of punishing your previous political enemies. Apparently wide swaths of the right have no such compunction, including the stupid piece of sh1t they elected president Quote
drobeski Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 I dont give a sh1t. Just not sure why anyone else does either. She lost the g0ddamn election. Its over, been over for more than a year. Once again: move on. gfy Quote
EternalShinyAndChrome Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 We will see what can be proved up in each case. Just know that we are Thrilled to have you supporting Muellers efforts in regards to the Trump investigation. Sure! I'll take President Pence! I'm sure you'll be on board with that as long as the orange man isn't there, right? Quote
wiffleball Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 For the dim wits here, and of course the rest of the Trumpsters around the country, this is just one more show anything to try and distract from the real issue. But, hey, as long as I don't have to hear Hillary speak, I couldn't give a rat's ass. But a couple things just so you guys don't keep wallowing in ignorance. When I speak of the 7 investigations, remember that there are congressional investigations and doj FBI investigations. Just as there are now. So, Congress largely headed by Gowdy investigate the hell out of this and still couldn't find anything to get Hillary on with a sufficient charge. That's number one. It's fun to blame the FBI I guess. But again, this was a republican lead and controlled investigation not once not twice but multiple times. Then there was the FBI investigations. Two. If we're going to do this, then let's go back and look at George Bush. Word is, about 9 million emails went missing under his administration. You know how it works, sauce for the goose... From what I remember from the investigations, they're going to have to find a memo directly from Hillary saying delete all of these emails right now! And that wasn't the case. There was a long standing deletion order based upon length of time. Your standard records retention if you will. If I'm Prosecuting, the best bone I can dig at is that the records retention policy wasn't suspended when Congress or the FBI said they had started an investigation. It's not an active crime, but it is a passive Omission at least. An overly aggressive prosecutor can probably push for malfeasance. But that's a damn slippery slope given the confidence of this Administration. Quote
Alias Detective Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 Whats next, a new investigation on JFKs mistresses? About as relevant today Was it relevant when she was running for President of the USA? Quote
wiffleball Posted January 6, 2018 Posted January 6, 2018 When I speak of the 7 investigations, remember that there are congressional investigations and doj FBI investigations. Just as there are now. So, Congress largely headed by Gowdy investigate the hell out of this and still couldn't find anything to get Hillary on with a sufficient charge. That's number one. It's fun to blame the FBI I guess. But again, this was a republican lead and controlled investigation not once not twice but multiple times. Then there was the FBI investigations. Two. If we're going to do this, then let's go back and look at George Bush. Word is, about 9 million emails went missing under his administration. You know how it works, sauce for the goose... From what I remember from the investigations, they're going to have to find a memo directly from Hillary saying delete all of these emails right now! And that wasn't the case. There was a long standing deletion order based upon length of time. Your standard records retention if you will. An overly aggressive prosecutor can probably push for malfeasance. But that's a damn slippery slope given the confidence of this Administration. Quote
Filthy Fernadez Posted January 6, 2018 Author Posted January 6, 2018 I dunno, I think I really am better than the folks on the other side of the coin here. Apparently wide swaths of the right have no such compunction, including the stupid piece of sh1t they elected president You're not better than the folks wanting criminals prosecuted for their crimes. But then again, why would we expect more from someone who'd support illegals guilty of felonies (rape, murder, etc) getting protected in Sanctuary Cities? Regardless of the risk to the lawful residents there all because you don't want any of Trump's agenda items moving forward. And please name where a Republican received millions from foreign governments in return for pushing through their agenda. Post that and I'll support that person going to jail. See how that works? You prosecute criminals regardless of their political status or have no laws at all. When I speak of the 7 investigations, remember that there are congressional investigations and doj FBI investigations. From what I remember from the investigations, they're going to have to find a memo directly from Hillary saying delete all of these emails right now! And that wasn't the case. There was a long standing deletion order based upon length of time. Your standard records retention if you will. The two investigations named have not been truly investigated otherwise we would already have: 1. Hillary testifying under oath about the email server BEFORE the FBI wrote the exoneration letter in regard to the email server 'investigation'. The first draft of that alluded to evidence showing criminal activity/intent. 2. Charges filed against Huma Abedin/Cheryl Mills for lying to the FBI (which negates their immunity deal so we may see them charged in the future). Again, interviewed AFTER exoneration letter written. 3. The money trail is CLEARLY visible in the Uranium One investigation. That's above and beyond the FBI informant information that was disregarded by Mueller. It's laughable you even try to defend those investigations. Quote
EternalShinyAndChrome Posted January 6, 2018 Posted January 6, 2018 Yes, I am better than you Negative. Quote
IGotWorms Posted January 6, 2018 Posted January 6, 2018 Negative. Jailing your political opponents is one of those litmus tests. If youre for it: youre a dangerous idiot who focking sucks. HTH Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.