Baker Boy 1,484 Posted July 5, 2018 The Left thinks bigotry is acceptable in the USA and they practice it daily, yet their message is of tolerance which makes them hypocrites. big·ot NOUN a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions. hy·poc·ri·sy NOUN the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense. They are a bunch of hate fill people who demand of others what they dont practice themselves. Where do you think this will go and what will the outcome be on society? I honestly dont see how anyone can be a part of this movement unless they are brainwashed. I can see why they hate the Constitution. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,014 Posted July 5, 2018 The title of your autobiography? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 1,652 Posted July 5, 2018 Cry-ba-by NOUN a person, especially a child, who sheds tears frequently or readily. Example: The Left thinks bigotry is acceptable in the USA and they practice it daily, yet their message is of tolerance which makes them hypocrites. big·ot NOUN a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions. hy·poc·ri·sy NOUN the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense. They are a bunch of hate fill people who demand of others what they dont practice themselves. Where do you think this will go and what will the outcome be on society? I honestly dont see how anyone can be a part of this movement unless they are brainwashed. I can see why they hate the Constitution. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,484 Posted July 5, 2018 Like I said they think it is OK, at least a few Bigots stepped forward right away. The word McCarthyism comes to mind, when did this thinking become acceptable? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,014 Posted July 5, 2018 The main plank of the new GOP Platform? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,484 Posted July 5, 2018 Keep them coming this is good stuff but it is scary how easily people will defend Bigotry. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,014 Posted July 5, 2018 Your mothers pet names for you? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,484 Posted July 5, 2018 Your mothers pet names for you? Your response to criticism is to insult since you can't otherwise defend your position. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,014 Posted July 5, 2018 Your list of 'Biggest Turn-on's" on White's Only Tinder? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted July 5, 2018 The end result of Hope and Change. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,484 Posted July 5, 2018 WATCH: Texas Teen Attacked in Restaurant for Wearing 'MAGA' Hat http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/07/05/watch-texas-teen-attacked-restaurant-wearing-maga-hat Campus fascists take over': University cancels conservative speaker Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/02/campus-fascists-take-over-university-cancels-conservative-speaker/#D7gBEBymrVULV1wW.99 DePaul cancels conservative’s speech http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/289999-depaul-cancels-conservatives-speech Tim Allen Show ‘Last Man Standing’ Cancelled for Political Reasons? https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tim-allen-cancelled-political-views/ Ann Coulter speech at UC Berkeley canceled, again, amid fears for safety https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2017/04/26/ann-coulter-speech-canceled-at-uc-berkeley-amid-fears-for-safety/?utm_term=.550ca4e79194 Student group cancels discussion on free speech because of generalized ‘safety’ concerns https://www.thecollegefix.com/post/43447/ James Woods is dropped by 'liberal' talent agent: 'It's the 4th of July and I'm feeling patriotic' http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/07/05/james-woods-is-dropped-by-liberal-talent-agent-its-4th-july-and-im-feeling-patriotic.html Etc., Etc., Etc. Hope and Change 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Electric Mayhem 35 Posted July 5, 2018 Not that I have the authority to speak on behalf of "THE LEFT", but here are my thoughts: Those that promote racism, sexism or other 'bad' values should not be allowed an open platform with no pushback, as they threaten to normalize their rhetoric. It should be made clear that those stances are not acceptable anywhere, but especially in a country that prides itself as a melting pot/liberty for all/all men are created equal place. Even I agree that it can go to far though, and there is no official authority on who or what should get the Nazi treatment. Nazis should get the Nazi treatment and fock whomever says otherwise. Some 'conservative' speakers are just Nazis in disguise looking to recruit and embolden their base. Others are getting dragged along as collateral damage, but only because their platforms have been hijacked by the douchebags with no internal housecleaning. I don't think THE LEFT ever had a platform of tolerance for all opinions. They promote tolerance of individuality, and that the rights of American should extend to everyone regardless of race, sexuality, gender or economic status. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,484 Posted July 5, 2018 Not that I have the authority to speak on behalf of "THE LEFT", but here are my thoughts: Those that promote racism, sexism or other 'bad' values should not be allowed an open platform with no pushback, as they threaten to normalize their rhetoric. It should be made clear that those stances are not acceptable anywhere, but especially in a country that prides itself as a melting pot/liberty for all/all men are created equal place. Even I agree that it can go to far though, and there is no official authority on who or what should get the Nazi treatment. Nazis should get the Nazi treatment and fock whomever says otherwise. Some 'conservative' speakers are just Nazis in disguise looking to recruit and embolden their base. Others are getting dragged along as collateral damage, but only because their platforms have been hijacked by the douchebags with no internal housecleaning. I don't think THE LEFT ever had a platform of tolerance for all opinions. They promote tolerance of individuality, and that the rights of American should extend to everyone regardless of race, sexuality, gender or economic status. What do you mean by Nazi? The roots of Nazi are Nationalsozialismus (National Socialism, later shortened to Nazi) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Electric Mayhem 35 Posted July 5, 2018 My own personal definition of Nazi is someone that promotes their race as superior while driving to eliminate other races, or their rights. And no, I don't care whether Hitler had political views that align to the current left. He killed Jews and gays. That's the part I'm really focused on here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted July 5, 2018 My own personal definition of Nazi is someone that promotes their race as superior while driving to eliminate other races, or their rights. so you mean someone/something planned parenthood? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawkeye21 1,852 Posted July 5, 2018 so you mean someone/something planned parenthood? How is that remotely similar? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 2,513 Posted July 5, 2018 Not that I have the authority to speak on behalf of "THE LEFT", but here are my thoughts: Those that promote racism, sexism or other 'bad' values should not be allowed an open platform with no pushback, as they threaten to normalize their rhetoric. It should be made clear that those stances are not acceptable anywhere, but especially in a country that prides itself as a melting pot/liberty for all/all men are created equal place. Even I agree that it can go to far though, and there is no official authority on who or what should get the Nazi treatment. Nazis should get the Nazi treatment and fock whomever says otherwise. Some 'conservative' speakers are just Nazis in disguise looking to recruit and embolden their base. Others are getting dragged along as collateral damage, but only because their platforms have been hijacked by the douchebags with no internal housecleaning. I don't think THE LEFT ever had a platform of tolerance for all opinions. They promote tolerance of individuality, and that the rights of American should extend to everyone regardless of race, sexuality, gender or economic status. Seems to always be a lot of focus on "Nazi" behavior, but does anyone ever call in question the Marxist/Communist behavior of the left? Why just ban Nazi behavior? I would say that Marxist/Communist behavior is as bad or even worse. Remember, Socialism has a body count of about 100+ million people in the 20th century alone between Stalin, Mao, North Korea and the Khmer Rouge. There is also a reasonable debate as to whether Hitler was a product of the left as well (The Nationalist Socialist Party). So while Nazi's are certainly bad, the real reigning in needs to happen on groups aligning with the left. Also, who gets to decide what are "bad values" and what aren't? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joneo 529 Posted July 5, 2018 The Left thinks bigotry is acceptable in the USA and they practice it daily, yet their message is of tolerance which makes them hypocrites. big·ot NOUN a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions. hy·poc·ri·sy NOUN the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense. They are a bunch of hate fill people who demand of others what they dont practice themselves. Where do you think this will go and what will the outcome be on society? I honestly dont see how anyone can be a part of this movement unless they are brainwashed. I can see why they hate the Constitution. Whats "funny" about this is the posters here who can't even respond to you without a childish retort and evading the point. Your point is so spot on they can't do anything but deflect. Just a pathetic bunch. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Guy 1,400 Posted July 5, 2018 WATCH: Texas Teen Attacked in Restaurant for Wearing 'MAGA' Hat http://insider.foxnews.com/2018/07/05/watch-texas-teen-attacked-restaurant-wearing-maga-hat Campus fascists take over': University cancels conservative speaker Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/02/campus-fascists-take-over-university-cancels-conservative-speaker/#D7gBEBymrVULV1wW.99 DePaul cancels conservative’s speech http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/289999-depaul-cancels-conservatives-speech Tim Allen Show ‘Last Man Standing’ Cancelled for Political Reasons? https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tim-allen-cancelled-political-views/ Ann Coulter speech at UC Berkeley canceled, again, amid fears for safety https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2017/04/26/ann-coulter-speech-canceled-at-uc-berkeley-amid-fears-for-safety/?utm_term=.550ca4e79194 Student group cancels discussion on free speech because of generalized ‘safety’ concerns https://www.thecollegefix.com/post/43447/ James Woods is dropped by 'liberal' talent agent: 'It's the 4th of July and I'm feeling patriotic' http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/07/05/james-woods-is-dropped-by-liberal-talent-agent-its-4th-july-and-im-feeling-patriotic.html Etc., Etc., Etc. Hope and Change The left knows no logic and has sick sour shix running through it's veins. They are simply attention whores who's audience is walking away. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,574 Posted July 5, 2018 My own personal definition of Nazi is someone that promotes their race as superior while driving to eliminate other races, or their rights. And no, I don't care whether Hitler had political views that align to the current left. He killed Jews and gays. That's the part I'm really focused on here. so the left they support Iran and other radical Islamic militant nations in killing gays and Jews meanwhile even our Nazis in this nation, I haven't heard of any gay or jew killing promotions Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Electric Mayhem 35 Posted July 5, 2018 I don't understand this thinking that "The left's views are based on hate." but somehow the right is immune to this criticism. The left's view are pretty much "we hate homophobes, misogynists, and racists." The rights are "We hate gays, women and dark skin colors." Who's correct here? If someone from the planet Altruistic Morality landed on Earth, do you honestly think they would align themselves with the right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 2,726 Posted July 5, 2018 My own personal definition of Nazi is someone that promotes their race as superior while driving to eliminate other races, or their rights.That's not a Nazi, that's a racist. I realize that words like racist and Nazi have lost the stigma that used to be associated with them because too many idiots have used the words frivolously but what you have described above is a racist not a Nazi. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,574 Posted July 5, 2018 I don't understand this thinking that "The left's views are based on hate." but somehow the right is immune to this criticism. The left's view are pretty much "we hate homophobes, misogynists, and racists." but we love ISLAM and IRAN The rights are "We hate gays, women and dark skin colors." Who's correct here? If someone from the planet Altruistic Morality landed on Earth, do you honestly think they would align themselves with the right? where have you EVER seen we hate women, gays, dark skin? MSNBC? Huffpo? Slate? VOX? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 2,726 Posted July 5, 2018 I don't understand this thinking that "The left's views are based on hate." but somehow the right is immune to this criticism. The left's view are pretty much "we hate homophobes, misogynists, and racists." The rights are "We hate gays, women and dark skin colors." Who's correct here? If someone from the planet Altruistic Morality landed on Earth, do you honestly think they would align themselves with the right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joneo 529 Posted July 5, 2018 Keep them coming this is good stuff but it is scary how easily people will defend Bigotry. Baker Boy, you forgot another definition that fits the left. ob·tuse əbˈt(y)o͞os,äbˈt(y)o͞os/ adjective 1. annoyingly insensitive or slow to understand. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Electric Mayhem 35 Posted July 5, 2018 so the left they support Iran and other radical Islamic militant nations in killing gays and Jews meanwhile even our Nazis in this nation, I haven't heard of any gay or jew killing promotions How exactly is the left supporting Iran and Islamic militants in killing gays and Jews. I mean, apart from the popular Democratic "Bullets for ISIS" GoFundMe. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,574 Posted July 5, 2018 How exactly is the left supporting Iran and Islamic militants in killing gays and Jews. I mean, apart from the popular Democratic "Bullets for ISIS" GoFundMe. the democrats support Muslim and the Palestine (controlled by Hamas a terrorist group) vs the Jews the democrats also supported giving money to terrorist Iran for some hostages, and to build bombs, and were outraged when Trump said nope no more maybe you can follow along after that Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Electric Mayhem 35 Posted July 5, 2018 That's not a Nazi, that's a racist. I realize that words like racist and Nazi have lost the stigma that used to be associated with them because too many idiots have used the words frivolously but what you have described above is a racist not a Nazi. Racist means you hold a negative opinion on someone because of their race. Nazi's also wanted to wipe Jews off the face of the planet by murdering them. Basically in the hierarchy of racism, you have: vanilla racists -> KKK members -> Nazis Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,082 Posted July 5, 2018 Not that I have the authority to speak on behalf of "THE LEFT", but here are my thoughts: Those that promote racism, sexism or other 'bad' values should not be allowed an open platform with no pushback, as they threaten to normalize their rhetoric. It should be made clear that those stances are not acceptable anywhere, but especially in a country that prides itself as a melting pot/liberty for all/all men are created equal place. Even I agree that it can go to far though, and there is no official authority on who or what should get the Nazi treatment. Nazis should get the Nazi treatment and fock whomever says otherwise. Some 'conservative' speakers are just Nazis in disguise looking to recruit and embolden their base. Others are getting dragged along as collateral damage, but only because their platforms have been hijacked by the douchebags with no internal housecleaning. I don't think THE LEFT ever had a platform of tolerance for all opinions. They promote tolerance of individuality, and that the rights of American should extend to everyone regardless of race, sexuality, gender or economic status. Who get's to determine this? What are the thresholds? If you didn't vote for Obama does that make you "racist"? If you voted for Trump does that make you "sexist"? If you are for tougher immigration laws does that make you a "Nazi"? Who gets to define who is and who isn't all these things? The reason I ask is because those terms are thrown around so much at so little of things that they're watered down. The whole Boy who Cried Wolf thingy. A lot of what's protested against isn't freakin' KKK marches. It's a comedian or speaker at a campus. It's a freaking fast food restaurant who's closed on Sundays. It's a press secretary doing her job. None of that hardly passes the smell test of what you're alluding too. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,082 Posted July 5, 2018 Racist means you hold a negative opinion on someone because of their race. A negative opinion, like just one. Well shiit.....I'd wager 99% of the world is racist then. Gah, I hold negative opinions of white rednecks who live in my town. I guess I'm racist against my own race. If everyone is "racist" is anyone really racist? Thought for the day. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,574 Posted July 5, 2018 Who get's to determine this? What are the thresholds? If you didn't vote for Obama does that make you "racist"? If you voted for Trump does that make you "sexist"? If you are for tougher immigration laws does that make you a "Nazi"? Who gets to define who is and who isn't all these things? The reason I ask is because those terms are thrown around so much at so little of things that they're watered down. The whole Boy who Cried Wolf thingy. A lot of what's protested against isn't freakin' KKK marches. It's a comedian or speaker at a campus. It's a freaking fast food restaurant who's closed on Sundays. It's a press secretary doing her job. None of that hardly passes the smell test of what you're alluding too. exactly, and who determines what is a "bad" value is thinking a man is a man and a woman is a woman a bad value? is thinking killing a baby is a bad value? is thinking not having open borders and defending our country a bad value? what are some of your values Electric Mayhem? cause after you take away our bad values they will come after yours, the progressive left never stops, they just push further and further Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 1,652 Posted July 5, 2018 A negative opinion, like just one. Well shiit.....I'd wager 99% of the world is racist then. Gah, I hold negative opinions of white rednecks who live in my town. I guess I'm racist against my own race. If everyone is "racist" is anyone really racist? Thought for the day. What do you call the person who races the most? A racest Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,636 Posted July 5, 2018 Has bladder boy ever published anything that he didn't cut and paste? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Electric Mayhem 35 Posted July 5, 2018 where have you EVER seen we hate women, gays, dark skin? MSNBC? Huffpo? Slate? VOX? Build the Wall ALL lives matter If they just followed police orders they would be alive today If they just didn't break the law they would be alive today Why do we need affirmative action? Gerrymandering is fair We are going to obstruct everything Obama does to delegitimize his Presidency Gays should not be able to marry Trans women only want to use Women's rooms to rape women Voter ID laws Gay conversion therapy promotion Anger at the removal of Confederate monuments Promotion of the Confederate flag "On both sides... on both sides" They're taking our jobs Also they only want stuff for free Refugees are M-13 rapists Women should not be in the military Women should not be in active duty Gays should not be in the military ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Electric Mayhem 35 Posted July 5, 2018 the democrats support Muslim and the Palestine (controlled by Hamas a terrorist group) vs the Jews the democrats also supported giving money to terrorist Iran for some hostages, and to build bombs, and were outraged when Trump said nope no more maybe you can follow along after that I've never heard of the first thing you mentioned - shoot me a link. As for the negotiation of hostages? That rings more like a "pro releasing of hostages" than "pro militants". If they were pro-militant they would have just given them the money with nothing in exchange, right? Also, if you're in the mood to be pissed at a party for arming Iran and militants, while not giving a rat's ass about hostages in the process, might I remind you of this little nugget: "The IranContra affair, also referred to as Irangate, Contragate or the IranContra scandal, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration. Senior administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was the subject of an arms embargo. They hoped, thereby, to fund the Contras in Nicaragua while at the same time negotiating the release of several U.S. hostages. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress." LOLS 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,574 Posted July 5, 2018 Build the Wall - not racist ALL lives matter -not racist If they just followed police orders they would be alive today - true If they just didn't break the law they would be alive today - true Why do we need affirmative action? -absolutely Gerrymandering is fair - its fair if both sides do it We are going to obstruct everything Obama does to delegitimize his Presidency - sounds like business as normal Gays should not be able to marry - Obama quote Trans women only want to use Women's rooms to rape women - said nobody ever Voter ID laws - how is that racist? you need an ID to drive, to cash a govt check, to cash any check, to rent a place to live Gay conversion therapy promotion - oh cause thinking therapy for confused kids is gay conversion therapy Anger at the removal of Confederate monuments - why does history need to be removed? fail to learn from history and you are doomed to repeat it ( I am sure you are fine with that Little House on the Prairie writer being called a racist too) Promotion of the Confederate flag - nobody promotes the flag, but it does serve as a historical representation of a once divided country (I am sure you are good with illegals flying whatever shithole flag they want) "On both sides... on both sides" - true They're taking our jobs - true Also they only want stuff for free - true Refugees are M-13 rapists - some are Women should not be in the military - to an extent I agree women bring chaos to large groups of men...I know I know, nature and all that men are pigs whatever Women should not be in active duty - see above they can do other stuff just not front line, its a man's natural instinct to protect women and children Gays should not be in the military - Clinton ... next again not a single thing you listed was homophobic, racist, or sexist 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,574 Posted July 5, 2018 I've never heard of the first thing you mentioned - shoot me a link. As for the negotiation of hostages? That rings more like a "pro releasing of hostages" than "pro militants". If they were pro-militant they would have just given them the money with nothing in exchange, right? Also, if you're in the mood to be pissed at a party for arming Iran and militants, while not giving a rat's ass about hostages in the process, might I remind you of this little nugget: "The IranContra affair, also referred to as Irangate, Contragate or the IranContra scandal, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration. Senior administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was the subject of an arms embargo. They hoped, thereby, to fund the Contras in Nicaragua while at the same time negotiating the release of several U.S. hostages. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress." LOLS I can tell you right now since I was about 12 years old I dont give a rats ass about that stuff during the Iran Contra stuff, but I think its bad sorry I don't feel bad for any hostages who go into those shitholes, and get caught, they know what they are facing, it is and always should be US policy to not pay for the release of hostages Palestine support https://www.timesofisrael.com/poll-democratic-support-for-israel-palestinians-nearly-identical/ https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/15/politics/democrats-views-on-israel-shifting/index.html under Obama https://www.republicanviews.org/democratic-views-on-israel/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Electric Mayhem 35 Posted July 5, 2018 Who get's to determine this? What are the thresholds? If you didn't vote for Obama does that make you "racist"? If you voted for Trump does that make you "sexist"? If you are for tougher immigration laws does that make you a "Nazi"? Who gets to define who is and who isn't all these things? The reason I ask is because those terms are thrown around so much at so little of things that they're watered down. The whole Boy who Cried Wolf thingy. A lot of what's protested against isn't freakin' KKK marches. It's a comedian or speaker at a campus. It's a freaking fast food restaurant who's closed on Sundays. It's a press secretary doing her job. None of that hardly passes the smell test of what you're alluding too. My response above included this sentence: "Even I agree that it can go to far though, and there is no official authority on who or what should get the Nazi treatment." There is a lot of grey area. Everyone probably draws their own lines of what is considered "TOO FAR!!!!!" I don't think anyone is calling Sanders a Nazi, they are just sick of her bold faces lies and arrogance in telling them. I'd be happy to share my own personal values if you actually care. They lean left, but not always. I try to use sympathy when I can, and empathy when I can't to define my morality. I'm sure some of my stances are silly, but they at least strive to be altruistic, even though they may miss. I don't think THE RIGHT's stances can say the same, nor do I think they have any desire to do so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,574 Posted July 5, 2018 My response above included this sentence: "Even I agree that it can go to far though, and there is no official authority on who or what should get the Nazi treatment." There is a lot of grey area. Everyone probably draws their own lines of what is considered "TOO FAR!!!!!" I don't think anyone is calling Sanders a Nazi, they are just sick of her bold faces lies and arrogance in telling them. I'd be happy to share my own personal values if you actually care. They lean left, but not always. I try to use sympathy when I can, and empathy when I can't to define my morality. I'm sure some of my stances are silly, but they at least strive to be altruistic, even though they may miss. I don't think THE RIGHT's stances can say the same, nor do I think they have any desire to do so. EM you put your stances, I will put mine, then we can come to a middle ground as far as too far, the 1st amendment means nothing is too far, and I believe that wholeheartedly call me a white trash cracker, I dont care, call someone a nagger whatever, incite violence is where the 1st amend ends, and thats what is being done by Maxine and her ilk 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites