Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
DanXIII

Slate making FFToday famous (again?)

Recommended Posts

https://slate.com/human-interest/2018/07/james-gunn-dan-harmon-mike-cernovich-the-far-rights-pedophilia-smear-campaign-is-working.html

 

 

 

On FFTodayForums.com, a user who quotes Trump in his profile posted a link to the video under the title, “#Himtoo Dan Harmon next up for being a pedophile.” Farther down the thread, others commented that “this is the crew constantly moralizing at the rest of us” and that “Hillary spent half her campaign hanging out with them … they couldn’t trot enough of them out on the stage at the DNC.” It’s not entirely clear to whom them refers in that comment, but it’s most likely trans people. (The July 2016 Democratic National Convention was the first in history to feature a transgender speaker.) Another user explicitly linked pedophilia to the issue of trans bathroom access, which the GOP has tried to restrict through legislation: “You mean you are opposed to your little girl using the same restroom as a grown man who decides to take a little extra peek between the door crack when hes walking by and hears her going tinkle? Bigot.”

 

 

Shitposting MAGAtards coming through in a big way! Congrats!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was talking about Hollywood elites, not Trans. So surprised the "reporter" got it wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sho got a job at Slate?

Sure...would be nice to get paid to beat the snot out of you like that author did.

But no, I do it for free.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure if they poke around here a little bit more they will find other enjoyable things too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was talking about Hollywood elites, not Trans. So surprised the "reporter" got it wrong.

Yep, of course they did. It was plainly obvious who you were talking about - Hollywood celebs.

 

I'll bet any money the writer at slate knew who you were talking about too but Twisted it to fit the narrative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure if they poke around here a little bit more they will find other enjoyable things too.

 

:nono:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure...would be nice to get paid to beat the snot out of you like that author did.

But no, I do it for free.

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey maybe this will increase our member totals to double-digits...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MIke must be so proud.

Would honestly be curious what runs through his melon. Most of the time I'm convinced that he sees nothing but volume. There's no good or bad as long as there's volume. That's how the stuff is monetized after all. Sometimes so much so, that I tend to think he has a couple of these 'guys' stirring crap deliberately.

 

On the flip side, I take him at his word in the rules thread. I can't believe that even Joe Bryant wants to be Joe Bryant. Just too damn much work. To the extent one group or type of people Tend to seek each other out and cluster together, so be it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, of course they did. It was plainly obvious who you were talking about - Hollywood celebs.

 

I'll bet any money the writer at slate knew who you were talking about too but Twisted it to fit the narrative.

And they wonder why they are not trusted, actually hated. The world is a diverse, interesting place. There is no need to make things up, yet they do it all the time. This is just another example, and we can all see it in action.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And they wonder why they are not trusted, actually hated. The world is a diverse, interesting place. There is no need to make things up, yet they do it all the time. This is just another example.

Wow. This is Rich.*

 

 

 

 

 

*Seth Rich. Eating Pedo Pizza in the Hogwarts-esque pedo basement kept warm by the huge stockpile of stolen uranium.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Wiffle and Shonuff are jealous. With all the word vomit they spew out every night and day and nobody quoted them. Lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The next few days should be fun.

We're gonna get jihaded. :lol:

 

 

 

 

Good luck fockers. :banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Amazing how much the deranged left is digging in over these pedo problems that are surfacing in Hollywood.

 

Disney fired a guy for tweeting about raping children and what does the MSM and celebrities do?

 

Defend him!

 

"It doesn't actually hurt children to joke about raping them on Twitter".-- Slate

 

Out of one corner of their mouth they are crying about children separated from their parents and out of the other side of their mouth they are drooling over pedo art and toddler rape jokes.

 

These people are sick.

 

And lol at slate trying to shame people for not being pro-pedo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We're gonna get jihaded. :lol:

 

 

 

 

Good luck fockers. :banana:

 

Strong outside chance that no one reads Slate heh

 

I only found that because someone completely unaffiliated with them tweeted the article.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Slate has zero credibility. Who in their right mind would link FFToday as a source for an article. :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What kind of journalist quotes a random message board in an article? It'd be like a sportswriter quoting PFT commenters to prove a point.

 

Internet commenters, for the most part, are trolls and morons. This place is no different. Just open up any political thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It'd be like a sportswriter quoting PFT commenters to prove a point.

 

 

 

As an aside, the *actual* "PFT Commenter" is leagues worse than "random PFT commenter"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What kind of journalist quotes a random message board in an article? It'd be like a sportswriter quoting PFT commenters to prove a point.

 

Internet commenters, for the most part, are trolls and morons. This place is no different. Just open up any political thread.

The kind that is trying defend pedos on all scales, all the way down to a 3 hamster driven low rent board.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Slate has zero credibility. Who in their right mind would link FFToday as a source for an article. :doh:

 

Sh*t, I'm not sure any of us who dare to read the political mental diarrhea the usual suspects post can be considered in our right minds

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt we see any more traffic because FFToday isn't mentioned until the 8th paragraph or so.

 

The 2 main questions I have are:

 

1. How did she even find this place?

2. How did the OP find her low rent blog article?

 

For anyone wondering what she looks like:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CMOA2K7WEAAQYJQ.jpg

The one on the left? :huh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, maybe, yes, ed thread.

No, No, yes, ed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really? And you guys are still against abortion?

 

(Still)Born This Way

You make a compelling case. :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt we see any more traffic because FFToday isn't mentioned until the 8th paragraph or so.

 

The 2 main questions I have are:

 

1. How did she even find this place?

2. How did the OP find her low rent blog article?

 

For anyone wondering what she looks like:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CMOA2K7WEAAQYJQ.jpg

 

is this one of those rank 'em posts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How the fock did they find us? :lol:

We should probably tidy up a bit.

 

I'll go delete all of my Leslie Jones / Harambe threads.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What kind of journalist quotes a random message board in an article? It'd be like a sportswriter quoting PFT commenters to prove a point.

 

Internet commenters, for the most part, are trolls and morons. This place is no different. Just open up any political thread.

And then has to twist the post to fit their point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×