Trade Cooks for TColeman? w h i r

[Candygram4Mongo 8]

12 Team. Half ppr,

Me:

WRs: Hopkins, MT, Boyd, Cooks

RBs: Mixon, Collins, Barber, CThompson, McGuire

7-2

 

Him:

WRs: AJGreen, Baldwin, Ridley, Goodwin, Cobb

RBs: Barkley, AP, PLinsey, TColeman

5-4

 

I could offer straight up 1-for-1, or throw in an RB2 for WR2 to alleviate position depth for both teams.

 

Thoughts?

 

[weepaws 2,459]

How many WRs and Rbs do you start and how about a flex?

[Candygram4Mongo 8]

How many WRs and Rbs do you start and how about a flex?

 

2 RB

2 WR

1 RB/WR Flex

[weepaws 2,459]

Yeah I like the trade for you.

 

Not so sure I would do it if I own Coleman for Cooks m

 

I would make you pay more.

 

But go shopping everyone has their own value.

 

Hey good luck and thanks for the replay.

[Candygram4Mongo 8]

Not so sure I would do it if I own Coleman for Cooks m

 

I would make you pay more.

 

For me, Hopkins and MT are untouchable.

 

The first offer I put out was Cooks/Barber for Coleman/Cobb.

I think he'll reject that, but hopefully he counters.

 

If he comes back for Lindsay for Cooks, I don't think I would go for it.

 

I would pair any of Barber, Thompson or Richard with Cooks to get Coleman.

[weepaws 2,459]

I truly understand your point, but I wouldn’t do it for Cooks or any of those others.

 

I would want more.

 

B Cooks could lose even more time if the rams keep rolling.

 

And that other team needs a wr1.

 

Anyway that’s just my thoughts.

 

Good luck m

[Byrdman5 104]

I think that is a good offer. i would probably just do 2 for 1. u dont really need cobb.

 

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=482345

[Candygram4Mongo 8]

So he countered with this:

 

I give Hopkins/Collins.

I get Coleman/Baldwin.

 

No.

Hopkins is the only elite in this equation, and Baldwin is eternally questionable.

 

What do you think of giving Cooks straight up for Lindsey?