Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
listen2me 23

Tyreek in trouble

Recommended Posts

https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2019/07/09/tyreek-hill-denies-2014-assault-in-new-audio-f-king-ruined-my-life/amp/

 

More of the explosive audio that embroiled Tyreek Hill in a child abuse investigation was aired on Tuesday, and in it, the Kansas City Chiefs star denies assaulting his then-girlfriend (now-fiancee) and child.

The original clip, first aired by KCTV 5 in April, revealed an argument between Hill and his fiancee Crystal Espinal over injuries sustained by the couple’s 3-year-old son.

The case against Hill was later declared “inactive.”

On Tuesday, Kansas City sports station 610 KCSP aired the entire conversation, secretly recorded by Espinal, in which the former couple argues about a 2014 incident Hill pleaded guilty to — domestic abuse by strangulation — which resulted in Hill being kicked off the Oklahoma State football team.

“You f–king ruined my life and you lied on me in 2014,” Hill says to Espinal in the clip. “I’m still not over that. I didn’t touch you in 2014.

 
“If you want to rewind that night, we can rewind that night, too. You was in my house. And did I pick you up and slam you? Hell no. I picked you up and put you out my door and after that you left.”

Espinal repeatedly asked Hill “where did the bruises come from?” while he said, “Did I hit you, though?”

Espinal also told Hill that “you had your hand around my neck,” but Hill responds, “No, I did not.”

The argument then shifted toward the couple’s son, where Espinal alleged that Hill broke the infant’s arm in March.

After the initial audio aired, police were called to the couple’s home in Overland Park, Kansas over an anonymous call from someone worried about Espinal.

The NFL and the Chiefs have heard the full recording, according to multiple reports.

Hill remains indefinitely banned from the Chiefs’ facilities, with the NFL having met with the wideout and a ruling expected prior to training camp.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like he may not have even been guilty of the 2014 crime.

Whoever got great value on Hill, because we didnt jump to asinine conclusions, we need to pat ourselves on  the back. Not just for getting good value, but also for not crucifying Hill without knowing what even happened. I have been told by people that my stance on Hill disgusts them (even when I said he should be suspended for his actions if guilty). Well it should equally disgust people that a man was crucified possibly for nothing. If it was up to some people, he would have been banned two minutes after the abbreviated audio came out. People would have happily banned Hill just because it makes them feel morally superior.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you did.... No I didn't.... 

I don't see anywhere where there is proof he is innocent. That being said, I don't know any truths or lies about these stories.

One fact I do know, Hill's been with a chick that they seem to get into extreme possible violent situations as well as him having a kid whose arm ended up broken. And his temper doesn't help him much in this situation. 

He is not a responsible parent or he would have seen that it would have been best they part a long time ago. He could still be with his kid and not have all the drama that his kid will end up learning from at a very young impressionable age. 

He's a really good entertainer when he is on the field though. Even if he is an ass. And if the Chiefs suspend him, good for them. If they don't suspend him, good for fantasy football.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure why the local TV station (KCTV5) that first aired a portion of this 11 minute audio, didn't make play or make the entire clip available originally. Unless there was a legal reason not to, this is yet another bad look for a media outlet. 🤨

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Mike FF Today said:

Not sure why the local TV station (KCTV5) that first aired a portion of this 11 minute audio, didn't make play or make the entire clip available originally. Unless there was a legal reason not to, this is yet another bad look for a media outlet. 🤨

Really bad. I think we know why it happened that way. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Really bad. I think we know why it happened that way. 

Do you think the media in the US is racist? Or are you implying something else about their motivation?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×