Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
tubby_mcgee

So defense attorney tells jurors they can't be predudice against guy with tatted face.

Recommended Posts

I was watching Court TV.  Apparently its back on the air?


Anyway... guy on trial for killing daughter.    Guys face is tatted the fawk up.  Commentators/analysts said today, that in court, the defense attorney was worried that jurors would lean more toward guilty because he had a fawked up face.   They said during some portion of the trial, the defense attorney told the jurors, they could not discriminate or be prejudiced against him. 


Fawk that. 


As with ANY stereotype.... they are real for the most part. I've talked about this before. A committee didn't get together to decide to try to make pit bulls look more dangerous than other dogs, or create a rumor that Amish worked hard, etc.

Stereotypes are derived from the "eye test".    Not based on a committee getting together to make someone look bad, for fawks sake.

So,  this dude, is already got a two tally marks in "oh sh!t column before the jury gets the case.
1.) He's accused by police.  That makes him guilty in the eyes of many before anything else happens.
2.) He looks the part of a murderer/thug/focktard.

 

Here is a link to case.

case

 

good looking fella

 

Whether the jurors are "allowed" to discriminate or not....uhhhh...they'll do as they please. 

 

Discuss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, vuduchile said:

Guilty

 


I'm generally one NOT to jump to that conclusion without hearing a lot of the case.  I heard a little bit today (I'd never even heard of this case til today). 
I had it on in my shop most of day. 

From what I have seen, he's guilty, the mom isn't.  

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I took a look at the picture you linked to. After 3 seconds, I arrived at the correct verdict.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So don't discriminate on looks but tell your client to wear a suit. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, sderk said:

So don't discriminate on looks but tell your client to wear a suit. 

Yeah, he looks so professional with a suit and tie. Just a regular guy going to work at his accounting job. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes black suit, black shirt and black tie too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lawyers can say whatever the fock they want.  The jury should rule on the evidence and understand that the purpose of a defense lawyer is to create "reasonable doubt".  Simple as that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm so surprised hard drugs were involved. If only they were legal senseless deaths like these wouldn't happen. Eye roll. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, sderk said:

So don't discriminate on looks but tell your client to wear a suit. 

Bingo.  We all know that tisn't the way that guy rolls. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it the prosecutions job to:

A.) Get the correct verdict
B.) Show the evidence they have obtained.  This evidence should result in guilty verdict.
C.)  Make sure the guy on trial is found guilty.

(same thing for defense, but vice versa)


So which is it?  Or which TWO things?


I'd say C and possibly C and B.  For sure it's C.    Honestly, the prosecution is C. 

The answer should be
"A" and "B".

I sometimes think that the prosecution, is only out to get A PERSON found guilty, not necessarily the correct person. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, jury instructions are for the most part worthless. And it's not like the court doesn't know that. But they're crossing  t's and dotting i's. If he didn't give that instruction, then that would be grounds for mistrial or appeal.

Like they say, you can't unring a bell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He just looks like a guy with some sort of brain damage.  I know back in the day they would use electroshock therapy to reset the brain and maybe fix the damage.  Then there was a lobotomy.  Today there are drugs to try to fix it.  I wonder what meds he is on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, riversco said:

He just looks like a guy with some sort of brain damage.  I know back in the day they would use electroshock therapy to reset the brain and maybe fix the damage.  Then there was a lobotomy.  Today there are drugs to try to fix it.  I wonder what meds he is on.

 

 

Yeah, he's sitting with his mouth open.  That seems always mean something, and it usually isn't "smart". 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only crazy people tattoo their face and neck. Guilty 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Shouldn’t he have a jury of his peers???

They're all in prison  :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If only he claimed to be a tranny, muslim and worn a burka.  He'd be the darling of CNN (and the libs here).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People with face tattoos are not a protected group.......yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't fathom a person who you could more prejudice against.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People with face tattoos want you to be prejudiced about it. Its the whole point. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

People with face tattoos want you to be prejudiced about it. Its the whole point. 

Any person with a tattoo from the neck and up is a grade a, class 1, NITWIT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, edjr said:

Any person with a tattoo from the neck and up is a grade a, class 1, NITWIT

Terry Rozier was on espn this morning.  He has a big Owl? tattoo on his neck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Herbivore said:

Terry Rozier was on espn this morning.  He has a big Owl? tattoo on his neck.

Who?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Herbivore said:

Terry Rozier was on espn this morning.  He has a big Owl? tattoo on his neck.

He was awesome on Tecmo Super Bowl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, riversco said:

He just looks like a guy with some sort of brain damage.  I know back in the day they would use electroshock therapy to reset the brain and maybe fix the damage.  Then there was a lobotomy.  Today there are drugs to try to fix it.  I wonder what meds he is on.

yup. nowadays we coddle the freaks and losers. we used to ostracize these people. throw them in insitutions. now we call them special and let them breed and wonder why these things happen :wacko:

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guilty of being a complete dumbass at a minimum. That should get LWOP. If they find him guilty of murder, kill him.

I would say "yes sir, I would never judge based on looks', all the while already deciding his fate of the electric chair or LWOP in general population where they can bvttfvck him daily. I mean look at this POS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Kamala had her way, that guy would be able to vote. 

 

Guilty on all charges with a death penalty recommendation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×