RLLD 3,455 Posted May 14, 2019 Link Quote Attorney General William Barr has appointed a U.S. attorney to examine the origins of the Russia investigation and determine if intelligence collection efforts targeting the Trump campaign were "lawful and appropriate," a person familiar with the situation told Fox News on Monday evening. John Durham, the U.S. attorney in Connecticut, will conduct the inquiry, the source said. The move comes as the Trump administration has pushed for answers on why federal authorities conducted the surveillance -- as well as whether Democrats were the ones who improperly colluded with foreign actors. Ruh-Roh..... I assume the Dem's will support this investigation with the same level of vigor as the one into Trump, right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted May 14, 2019 Politically motivated witch hunt! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
avoiding injuries 1,220 Posted May 14, 2019 The media spin has already begun. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,380 Posted May 14, 2019 Remember when the Lefty's called the spying a hoax? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted May 14, 2019 4 minutes ago, Cdub100 said: Remember when the Lefty's called the spying a hoax? Most of those guys ran from here when the truth made them out to be fools. There's a couple of fools still lingering Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 14, 2019 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D6fVddeWsAEvZ_a?format=jpg&name=small It's been opened for months. The above link is from James Baker's Oct 3rd, 2018 testimony. PANIC in DC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted May 14, 2019 “John Durham is a fierce, fair prosecutor. As a career prosecutor, John has dedicated his life to public service and the pursuit of justice. He knows how to try tough cases, having taken on organized crime and government corruption. He will be an outstanding U.S. attorney,” Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy said in a statement. We'll see if Lispy Blewthemall feels the same way Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,380 Posted May 14, 2019 13 minutes ago, drobeski said: “John Durham is a fierce, fair prosecutor. As a career prosecutor, John has dedicated his life to public service and the pursuit of justice. He knows how to try tough cases, having taken on organized crime and government corruption. He will be an outstanding U.S. attorney,” Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy said in a statement. We'll see if Lispy Blewthemall feels the same way He sounds like a rapist or racist. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crackattack 513 Posted May 14, 2019 Just so I know ahead of time, are conservatives happy with these appointees to lead the investigation? Are liberals? This way, when the investigation is over, we can see who backtracks or flip flops. We can see who calls them deep state plants or angry conservatives on a witch hunt if the results aren't to their liking. Tia 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,455 Posted May 14, 2019 1 hour ago, Cdub100 said: Remember when the Lefty's called the spying a hoax? Vividly....called it a hoax, called a Trump a liar, said Trump was lying when he said it......oh yes, i remember the propaganda arm of the Democratic party doing everything they could to impugn the mere notion of malfeasance.... HOW DARE anyone suggest something out of sorts being done by the Democrats..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,640 Posted May 14, 2019 You mean other than Rod Rosenstein order number 3915 - 2 0 1 7 (b)(i)? https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3726408-Rosenstein-letter-appointing-Mueller-special.html Yes, it's a freaking mystery where this investigation came from. And who authorized this Rod Rosenstein guy anyway? https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/politics/blog/bal-trump-to-nominate-rod-rosenstein-deputy-attorney-general-20170131-story.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 1,480 Posted May 14, 2019 24 minutes ago, crackattack said: Just so I know ahead of time, are conservatives happy with these appointees to lead the investigation? Are liberals? This way, when the investigation is over, we can see who backtracks or flip flops. We can see who calls them deep state plants or angry conservatives on a witch hunt if the results aren't to their liking. Tia I'm a Libertarian, and I will be disappointed if people are convicted and jailed over these investigations. I would rather see people convicted and hung for treason, so there is no chance for a pardon. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crackattack 513 Posted May 14, 2019 2 minutes ago, lickin_starfish said: I'm a Libertarian, and I will be disappointed if people are convicted and jailed over these investigations. I would rather see people convicted and hung for treason, so there is no change for a pardon. So you're pleased with the lead investigators? I agree with your punishment if found guilty of treason For the record. I'm fine with the appointed prosecutor's. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted May 14, 2019 18 minutes ago, wiffleball said: You mean other than Rod Rosenstein order number 3915 - 2 0 1 7 (b)(i)? https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3726408-Rosenstein-letter-appointing-Mueller-special.html Yes, it's a freaking mystery where this investigation came from. And who authorized this Rod Rosenstein guy anyway? https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/politics/blog/bal-trump-to-nominate-rod-rosenstein-deputy-attorney-general-20170131-story.html So sad.... so you're cool with this guy investigating right ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Herbivore 905 Posted May 14, 2019 1 hour ago, Ray Lewis's Limo Driver said: Vividly....called it a hoax, called a Trump a liar, said Trump was lying when he said it......oh yes, i remember the propaganda arm of the Democratic party doing everything they could to impugn the mere notion of malfeasance.... HOW DARE anyone suggest something out of sorts being done by the Democrats..... what is this about? don't remember. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted May 14, 2019 So far, all we have proof of is the Russians meddled, Hillary had an illegal private server, Hillary paid for dirt on Trump, and Trump wasn't involved in any of it. I assume there is more, so I am fine with the investigation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 15, 2019 On 5/14/2019 at 3:03 PM, wiffleball said: You mean other than Rod Rosenstein order number 3915 - 2 0 1 7 (b)(i)? https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3726408-Rosenstein-letter-appointing-Mueller-special.html Yes, it's a freaking mystery where this investigation came from. And who authorized this Rod Rosenstein guy anyway? https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/politics/blog/bal-trump-to-nominate-rod-rosenstein-deputy-attorney-general-20170131-story.html Since you're pointing out Rod.......do you accept his and Barr's conclusions of the Mueller Report? Mueller did........... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 15, 2019 https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dispute-erupts-over-whether-brennan-comey-pushed-steele-dossier-as-doj-probe-into-misconduct-begins Finger pointing escalating between Comey and Brennan. There are so many strings unraveling with this Russia investigation, it's hard to keep track of them all. Bruce Ohr.......the DOJ employee was CIA for several years. Was he still under Brennan's control? Strzok the FBI guy.............same thing. A few others who facilitated the State Dept meeting with Christopher Steele as well. Brennan started a huge amount of this at the behest of who? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
12th Man 884 Posted May 15, 2019 She was never supposed to lose 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted May 15, 2019 Ya have to wonder what was it they had to hide ? Crimes so egregious that they were willing to commit treason in order to hide it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted May 15, 2019 1 hour ago, Filthy Fernadez said: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dispute-erupts-over-whether-brennan-comey-pushed-steele-dossier-as-doj-probe-into-misconduct-begins Finger pointing escalating between Comey and Brennan. There are so many strings unraveling with this Russia investigation, it's hard to keep track of them all. Bruce Ohr.......the DOJ employee was CIA for several years. Was he still under Brennan's control? Strzok the FBI guy.............same thing. A few others who facilitated the State Dept meeting with Christopher Steele as well. Brennan started a huge amount of this at the behest of who? Every time I read about Comey, I get more and more impressed. Appointed to be a false front, he covers his butt better than anyone in this mess. Tells me right off the bat, he was not one of the "in crowd" with McCabe, Strozk, et al. Why do I have a feeling that he has the goods and he is ready to spill all of them under the right circumstances. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 15, 2019 15 minutes ago, TimmySmith said: Every time I read about Comey, I get more and more impressed. Appointed to be a false front, he covers his butt better than anyone in this mess. Tells me right off the bat, he was not one of the "in crowd" with McCabe, Strozk, et al. Why do I have a feeling that he has the goods and he is ready to spill all of them under the right circumstances. Comey's a focking enigma. I'm not sure if he's playing a part in this theater or if he's dirty AF. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted May 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said: Comey's a focking enigma. I'm not sure if he's playing a part in this theater or if he's dirty AF. He hasn't covered up anything that can be pinned on him. He is obviously wary of the Clintons. The left was mad he was fired, but other than that, they aren't putting him on a pedestal. It all adds up to him being an outsider in their scheme. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,640 Posted May 16, 2019 13 hours ago, Filthy Fernadez said: Since you're pointing out Rod.......do you accept his and Barr's conclusions of the Mueller Report? Mueller did........... No he didn't. Even Barr admitted that. M wrote a letter specifically protesting Barrs Narnia like summary. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetillman/mueller-barr-letter-testimony Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,640 Posted May 16, 2019 11 hours ago, TimmySmith said: Every time I read about Comey, I get more and more impressed. Appointed to be a false front, he covers his butt better than anyone in this mess. Tells me right off the bat, he was not one of the "in crowd" with McCabe, Strozk, et al. Why do I have a feeling that he has the goods and he is ready to spill all of them under the right circumstances. So, Comey was appointed to be a false front against Trump years before the election even happened. Wow, he is good! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted May 16, 2019 5 hours ago, wiffleball said: So, Comey was appointed to be a false front against Trump years before the election even happened. Wow, he is good! Trump on the brain. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,455 Posted May 16, 2019 I think the question now just might be, who turns on who first. And who is eventually outed on this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted May 16, 2019 6 hours ago, wiffleball said: So, Comey was appointed to be a false front against Trump years before the election even happened. Wow, he is good! They spied on Cruz too...Obama and his goons were real sleazy sh!tbags. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JustinCharge 2,397 Posted May 16, 2019 What makes this investigation into the Russia investigation so interesting is that there doesn't seem to be a "big fish" at the end of it. Obama is basically out of politics. Hillary is an old woman that will probably die of natural causes in 10 years. I can't see Biden winning the nomination so even if they find something on him, it doesn't matter politically and Biden is probably dead of natural causes in 10 years as well. So where is this going? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
12th Man 884 Posted May 16, 2019 4 minutes ago, riversco said: What makes this investigation into the Russia investigation so interesting is that there doesn't seem to be a "big fish" at the end of it. Obama is basically out of politics. Hillary is an old woman that will probably die of natural causes in 10 years. I can't see Biden winning the nomination so even if they find something on him, it doesn't matter politically and Biden is probably dead of natural causes in 10 years as well. So where is this going? The biggest political scandal in American history. The biggest threat to our country since the Cold War. That’s where it’s going. Jesus. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JustinCharge 2,397 Posted May 16, 2019 1 minute ago, 12th Man said: The biggest political scandal in American history. The biggest threat to our country since the Cold War. That’s where it’s going. Jesus. I just cannot think of any investigation that had no big fish at the end of it before. Whitewater had Bill Clinton. Iran-Contra had Reagan. Watergate had Nixon. Without a big fish at the end, I think you run a real risk of the public getting very fatigued with the story and eventually they will want it to just go away. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,455 Posted May 16, 2019 I think that I hope what this delivers at the end of the day is some separation between politics and the FBI/CIA/DOJ. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,380 Posted May 16, 2019 4 minutes ago, riversco said: What makes this investigation into the Russia investigation so interesting is that there doesn't seem to be a "big fish" at the end of it. Obama is basically out of politics. Hillary is an old woman that will probably die of natural causes in 10 years. I can't see Biden winning the nomination so even if they find something on him, it doesn't matter politically and Biden is probably dead of natural causes in 10 years as well. So where is this going? I disagree Obama is not out of politics, and non of those people are dying in 10 years. Hopefully this is going to where this will never happen again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 1,480 Posted May 16, 2019 1 hour ago, riversco said: So where is this going? It had better be going to the gallows. Hillary, Obama, Comey, Clapper, Strozk, Ohr, McCabe, and others should be swinging by their necks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,455 Posted May 16, 2019 I wan to avoid being like the Democrats on this......yes, we need to investigate and see if there are serious issues at play, PROVABLE issues. And then see what action is appropriate to ensure accountability, but just as important to employ safeguards to not allow it to happen again.... Political vengeance is a Democrat tactic, as a conservative I want us to hold ourselves to a higher level, lets not devolve into the hate and violence of the left. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JustinCharge 2,397 Posted May 16, 2019 2 hours ago, Cdub100 said: I disagree Obama is not out of politics, and non of those people are dying in 10 years. Hopefully this is going to where this will never happen again. This could be heading towards finding obama guilty of spying on trump in 2016. What is the move then? Life in prison for obama? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,455 Posted May 16, 2019 5 minutes ago, riversco said: This could be heading towards finding obama guilty of spying on trump in 2016. What is the move then? Life in prison for obama? No. I hate to say this but going after Obama....to me...is not the way to go here. I do not want to go down any road where the next guy up exacts anything that even smells like possibly being political vengeance......I cannot see that as being helpful in any way. I suspect you could do this to any and every president that ever was or will be. They have to make decisions, and I want those decisions to NOT be personally or politically movivated, nor influenced by what might happen later.... I just cannot get behind it... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JustinCharge 2,397 Posted May 16, 2019 If you wanted to push the democrats into rioting in the streets, threatening to put obama in prison might be the most effective strategy. They hero worship him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
12th Man 884 Posted May 16, 2019 16 minutes ago, riversco said: This could be heading towards finding obama guilty of spying on trump in 2016. What is the move then? Life in prison for obama? Hussein should hang for treason. I would gladly be the executioner. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites