More Crazy, Sleepy Joe

[Fireballer 2,369]

Hes the gift that keeps giving

 

[naomi 343]

Full video here and another video from the same event with a NAACP leader who references much of the same story, remarking how Biden stood his ground. https://www.mediaite.com/news/watch-joe-biden-tells-story-of-facing-down-razor-wielding-gang-leader-named-corn-pop/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

He still sounds short some marbles without the clip editing, and even with the story apparently being somewhat true.

[Voltaire 4,554]

Did I ever tell you about the time I was almost assaulted by Frosted Flake and CoCo Puff?

[sderk 1,040]

8 hours ago, Fireballer said:

Hes the gift that keeps giving

 

This should get the black vote.

 

[Voltaire 4,554]

10 hours ago, naomi said:

 

He still sounds short some marbles without the clip editing, and even with the story apparently being somewhat true.

Biden's secret weapon in the primaries is the other Dems are too PC to go there..... until Castro went there. One reason that I want Biden to make the General election is so that I can hear Trump's perspective on this.

It's amusing that the only sane Democrat suffers from mild dementia.

[sderk 1,040]

5 hours ago, Voltaire said:

Biden's secret weapon in the primaries is the other Dems are too PC to go there..... until Castro went there. One reason that I want Biden to make the General election is so that I can hear Trump's perspective on this.

It's amusing that the only sane Democrat suffers from mild dementia.

Mild?

[Big Guy 1,400]

what a nutbag 

did you guys see the video of him dropping his upper teeth?

[drobeski 3,061]

Corn pop

[sderk 1,040]

Corn pop. From the Mod Squad? Or maybe a bad guy from Beretta?

[drobeski 3,061]

Wiffs boy 

[Big Guy 1,400]

 

[Fireballer 2,369]

OG/BYN???  Anyway, great story.  Im sure this wont end up in sexual assaults. Housing women identifying as men with men prisoners?  And a man Is that "identifying" as a woman is housed with women? Is that whats hes saying?  How is this guy leading?

 

[DonS 3,063]

1 hour ago, Fireballer said:

OG/BYN???  Anyway, great story.  Im sure this wont end up in sexual assaults. Housing women identifying as men with men prisoners?  And a man Is that "identifying" as a woman is housed with women? Is that whats hes saying?  How is this guy leading?

 

If you know you're guilty as fock and going to prison you might as well start wearing a dress during the trial in order to guarantee an endless supply of poosay while serving your sentence. 

[Voltaire 4,554]

Argh. He’s lost his lead in Iowa in the latest poll. Hang in there Joe. We need you to win this nomination. Stop appearing in public.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,493]

1 minute ago, Voltaire said:

Argh. He’s lost his lead in Iowa in the latest poll. Hang in there Joe. We need you to win this nomination. Stop appearing in public.

If Joe doesn't get the nomination and Warren does I'm not sure how I would feel.

On one hand, if Trump loses to Warren then it's going to be awesome to watch Hillary meltdown over another woman getting the crown that she thought she was supposed to get.

Of course, on the other hand, if Trump beats Warren that would be great too and watch the Left go apesh#t.

[sderk 1,040]

The left needs to run a black,  transgender (born male now "female"), raised in Columbia, reality tv show actor, who is an illegal immigrant and  who is best friends with robert dinero.

[Voltaire 4,554]

9 hours ago, sderk said:

The left needs to run a black,  transgender (born male now "female"), raised in Columbia, reality tv show actor, who is an illegal immigrant and  who is best friends with robert dinero.

That’s tough. They might have to settle for Beta.

[drobeski 3,061]

11 hours ago, sderk said:

The left needs to run a black,  transgender (born male now "female"), raised in Columbia, reality tv show actor, who is an illegal immigrant and  who is best friends with robert dinero.

Michelle ?

[sderk 1,040]

10 minutes ago, drobeski said:

Michelle ?

Ding ding ding ding... We have a winner here!

[Fireballer 2,369]

I love Joe.  Imagine this guy being your top candidate

 

 

[Utilit99 4,099]

14 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

I love Joe.  Imagine this guy being your top candidate

 

 

That child abuser is the best of the left. What can they do?

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,493]

Dude is no way ready to be president.  Way too old, senile and just weird:

https://www.businessinsider.com/biden-bites-wifes-finger-in-bizarre-campaign-stop-moment-2019-11

Quote

Joe Biden nibbled on his wife's finger in a bizarre campaign stop moment

 

[MDC 5,877]

Trump / Biden would have some epic creepy old senile man debates.  

[Fireballer 2,369]

9 minutes ago, MDC said:

Trump / Biden would have some epic creepy old senile man debates.  

True story

[IGotWorms 3,300]

Lol like any Trump supporter can ever claim another candidate is unhinged.

I agree in normal times he’d seem a bit odd, but, well...

My issue is he’s too old. Bernie too. Buttigieg is too young and inexperienced. Warren is fading. It’s a rough time for sure

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,493]

8 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Lol like any Trump supporter can ever claim another candidate is unhinged.

I agree in normal times he’d seem a bit odd, but, well...

My issue is he’s too old. Bernie too. Buttigieg is too young and inexperienced. Warren is fading. It’s a rough time for sure

who claimed he was "unhinged"?

[Utilit99 4,099]

36 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

who claimed he was "unhinged"?

If you are still talking about biden, he's not unhinged. He's just a child molester at heart.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,493]

1 minute ago, Utilit99 said:

If you are still talking about biden, he's not unhinged. He's just a child molester at heart.

Yes - in the JOE BIDEN thread - I'm talking about Joe Biden.   

Worms is saying we're calling him "unhinged", which is not even close to "weird" or "old".  And I find it funny that someone like Worms would even bring up the word "unhinged" since he and his side have been in a perpetual state of "unhinged" since at least November 2016.

[TBayXXXVII 2,106]

I'd like to say that the reason why Biden is the front runner is because there's still a lot of normal Democrats out there, but that would be blind optimism.  The truth is, the only real reason is that there are too many socialists still in the running.  Biden will lose ground once the rest of the field is reduced to either Sanders or Warren.  To note, it will be Warren as the Democrats won't allow there to be 2 old white guys vying for the nomination.  Bernie will probably get screwed again.  In the end, the party and media will again force Warren as their representative because they're trying to remove the white man from their party.  Trump will end up beating Warren because she'll need to move too far left to get the nomination that she'll lose the Independent vote.

 

What the Democrats (the normal ones), need to do is to separate themselves from the radical element.  To those who are Democrat that don't think the radical element is that popular in their ranks, all you need to do is to look at your side's candidates... they're all socialists except for Biden.  Tulsi was your best chance at a normal Democrat candidate, and your party is doing everything they can to silence her.  The normi's need to force out the socialists and regain their voice in their party.  They need to stop their media from attacking Republican's.  The plus side to this situation is that Trump will be re-elected and the Republican's will take back the House and control Washington.  With luck, all the socialist azzwipes will leave the country and get us back to normal.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,493]

10 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

I'd like to say that the reason why Biden is the front runner is because there's still a lot of normal Democrats out there, but that would be blind optimism.  The truth is, the only real reason is that there are too many socialists still in the running.  Biden will lose ground once the rest of the field is reduced to either Sanders or Warren.  To note, it will be Warren as the Democrats won't allow there to be 2 old white guys vying for the nomination.  Bernie will probably get screwed again.  In the end, the party and media will again force Warren as their representative because they're trying to remove the white man from their party.  Trump will end up beating Warren because she'll need to move too far left to get the nomination that she'll lose the Independent vote.

 

What the Democrats (the normal ones), need to do is to separate themselves from the radical element.  To those who are Democrat that don't think the radical element is that popular in their ranks, all you need to do is to look at your side's candidates... they're all socialists except for Biden.  Tulsi was your best chance at a normal Democrat candidate, and your party is doing everything they can to silence her.  The normi's need to force out the socialists and regain their voice in their party.  They need to stop their media from attacking Republican's.  The plus side to this situation is that Trump will be re-elected and the Republican's will take back the House and control Washington.  With luck, all the socialist azzwipes will leave the country and get us back to normal.

Great Post! 

However, we need to purge our country of Socialists.  The fact that the Democrat Party has been taken over and essentially being run by Socialists should scare everyone. 

[Fireballer 2,369]

8 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

 The truth is, the only real reason is that there are too many socialists still in the running.  Biden will lose ground once the rest of the field is reduced to either Sanders or Warren.  

I think hes still there because hes the candidate that will carry the highest black vote.  Kamala isnt fooling anyone.

[fandandy 3,311]

On 9/15/2019 at 8:38 PM, Voltaire said:

Did I ever tell you about the time I was almost assaulted by Frosted Flake and CoCo Puff?

Did you file a police report with Captain Crunch?

[KSB2424 3,082]

I actually feel bad for him. Seriously.  Something isn’t right. :sad:

[IGotWorms 3,300]

1 hour ago, TBayXXXVII said:

I'd like to say that the reason why Biden is the front runner is because there's still a lot of normal Democrats out there, but that would be blind optimism.  The truth is, the only real reason is that there are too many socialists still in the running.  Biden will lose ground once the rest of the field is reduced to either Sanders or Warren.  To note, it will be Warren as the Democrats won't allow there to be 2 old white guys vying for the nomination.  Bernie will probably get screwed again.  In the end, the party and media will again force Warren as their representative because they're trying to remove the white man from their party.  Trump will end up beating Warren because she'll need to move too far left to get the nomination that she'll lose the Independent vote.

 

What the Democrats (the normal ones), need to do is to separate themselves from the radical element.  To those who are Democrat that don't think the radical element is that popular in their ranks, all you need to do is to look at your side's candidates... they're all socialists except for Biden.  Tulsi was your best chance at a normal Democrat candidate, and your party is doing everything they can to silence her.  The normi's need to force out the socialists and regain their voice in their party.  They need to stop their media from attacking Republican's.  The plus side to this situation is that Trump will be re-elected and the Republican's will take back the House and control Washington.  With luck, all the socialist azzwipes will leave the country and get us back to normal.

Well you’re way off in that the only one who’s “socialist” is Bernie and he just calls himself that. Warren is very much a capitalist and will tell you all the time, but in the trust-busting vein of teddy Roosevelt. Was Roosevelt a socialist?? The rest aren’t even close and I notice you failed to mention Buttigieg.

 The real problem is they don’t have a strong centrist candidate. Biden is too old and Buttigieg too young and inexperienced. Nobody takes Booker seriously and for good reason. Klobuchar should have more of a following but let’s face it, women have a super huge uphill battle in presidential politics. So it’s Warren or Sanders and personally I’d rather go for the real thing in Sanders. Plus Warren gets hit with the unlikable tag aka she is a woman.

[IGotWorms 3,300]

The thing I like about Sanders is he isn’t going to give the time of day to that “woke” SJW sh1t. Not that he’s necessarily against it, he just recognizes it’s silly and frivolous. Eye on the prize, which is improving the living and economic condition of us 99%ers

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,493]

27 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Well you’re way off in that the only one who’s “socialist” is Bernie and he just calls himself that. Warren is very much a capitalist and will tell you all the time, but in the trust-busting vein of teddy Roosevelt. Was Roosevelt a socialist?? The rest aren’t even close and I notice you failed to mention Buttigieg.

 The real problem is they don’t have a strong centrist candidate. Biden is too old and Buttigieg too young and inexperienced. Nobody takes Booker seriously and for good reason. Klobuchar should have more of a following but let’s face it, women have a super huge uphill battle in presidential politics. So it’s Warren or Sanders and personally I’d rather go for the real thing in Sanders. Plus Warren gets hit with the unlikable tag aka she is a woman.

Huh?  Warren ISN'T a socialist? 

And "will tell you all the time"?    Of course she will because she has something to gain by lying. 

FFS, she told us she was Indian. 

FFS, she told us her kids DIDN'T go to private school. 

FFS, she said her 53 Trillion Socialist takeover of our health system wouldn't affect the middle class or lower. 

My goodness you're dense.

[Fireballer 2,369]

4 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

The thing I like about Sanders is he isn’t going to give the time of day to that “woke” SJW sh1t. 

Youre joking, right?  He got pwned by BLM in the last election.  He let them shut down his rally.  

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,493]

2 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

Youre joking, right?  He got pwned by BLM in the last election.  He let them shut down his rally.  

Yeah, that looked terrible. He looked like an old, tired beta-cuck who just gave in.

A real man would have told them to Fock Off and pushed them offstage himself.  THAT would have probably gotten him the Presidency had he done that.

[TBayXXXVII 2,106]

24 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Well you’re way off in that the only one who’s “socialist” is Bernie and he just calls himself that. Warren is very much a capitalist and will tell you all the time, but in the trust-busting vein of teddy Roosevelt. Was Roosevelt a socialist?? The rest aren’t even close and I notice you failed to mention Buttigieg.

 The real problem is they don’t have a strong centrist candidate. Biden is too old and Buttigieg too young and inexperienced. Nobody takes Booker seriously and for good reason. Klobuchar should have more of a following but let’s face it, women have a super huge uphill battle in presidential politics. So it’s Warren or Sanders and personally I’d rather go for the real thing in Sanders. Plus Warren gets hit with the unlikable tag aka she is a woman.

Yeah, Warren is a capitalist... just like she's a Native American.  The only reason women have an uphill battle is because specific candidate are bad.  Also, for the most part, women don't WANT to be President.  That's not anyone's fault, just reality.

I didn't mention Buttigieg because like Klobuchar, Harris, Booker, Yang, and Booker, he has no chance.  They're also a lot closer to being socialists than they are capitalists.

Was Roosevelt a socialist?  No, just a racist.  That's why he was so popular with the Democrats... and still is.  That should tell you something.  But, because you don't see the fact that your party is the party that you project on to the Republican party, it'll just go by without notice.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,493]

2 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Yeah, Warren is a capitalist... just like she's a Native American.  The only reason women have an uphill battle is because specific candidate are bad.  Also, for the most part, women don't WANT to be President.  That's not anyone's fault, just reality.

I didn't mention Buttigieg because like Klobuchar, Harris, Booker, Yang, and Booker, he has no chance.  They're also a lot closer to being socialists than they are capitalists.

Was Roosevelt a socialist?  No, just a racist.  That's why he was so popular with the Democrats... and still is.  That should tell you something.  But, because you don't see the fact that your party is the party that you project on to the Republican party, it'll just go by without notice.

TBay putting on a clinic.